<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - John Roberts</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/john_roberts</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: John Roberts</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s Roberts did not challenge McCain adviser&#x27;s claim that McCain understands the economy by noting numerous dubious economic statements  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200807030010</link>
<description>On CNN&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Situation Room&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Carly Fiorina asserted that Sen. John McCain is &#x22;extremely well qualified&#x22; on the economy and that he &#x22;understands how the economy works.&#x22; John Roberts did not challenge Fiorina&#x27;s assertion, and he concluded the interview without noting numerous statements by McCain on the economy that were false or disputed by economists -- including McCain&#x27;s own economic adviser -- or that McCain has repeatedly acknowledged weakness on economic issues.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200807030010</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 3 Jul 2008 19:07:58 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s Roberts asserted that McCain is a &#x22;maverick&#x22; and &#x22;independent&#x22; from Bush, ignoring McCain&#x27;s votes and statements  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200807030003</link>
<description>CNN&#x27;s John Roberts asserted that Sen. John McCain &#x22;is a very different person, at least his record in terms of being a maverick and independent, than George Bush.&#x22; But Roberts did not mention that, according to &#x3C;em&#x3E;&#x3C;em&#x3E;Congressional Quarterly&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, McCain was the Bush administration&#x27;s most reliable supporter in the Senate in 2007, or that McCain said in 2005 that &#x22;on the transcendent issues, the most important issues of our day, I&#x27;ve been totally in agreement and support of President Bush.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200807030003</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 3 Jul 2008 13:44:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media continue to falsely claim Clark criticized McCain&#x27;s service  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200807010005</link>
<description>Several media reports falsely claimed that Wesley Clark criticized Sen. John McCain&#x27;s military service during a June 29 appearance on CBS&#x27; &#x3C;em&#x3E;Face the Nation&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, including CNN anchor John Roberts, who said that &#x22;Clark took a weekend hit at McCain, targeting his history as a war hero and his possible future as president.&#x22; In fact, Clark praised McCain as &#x22;a hero to me and to hundreds of thousands of millions of others in the Armed Forces as a prisoner of war.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200807010005</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 1 Jul 2008 16:42:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s Roberts  equated &#x22;Christian conservatives&#x22; with &#x22;values  voters&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200711300001</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Anderson&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x3C;em&#x3E; Cooper 360&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, CNN&#x27;s John Roberts said of Mike Huckabee: &#x22;[H]e 
brings Christian conservatives in the door, values voters.&#x22; CNN personalities 
have repeatedly linked &#x22;values&#x22; and religious faith to conservative voters or 
politicians.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200711300001</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:09:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Kurtz: Clinton&#x27;s Ground Zero ad is treading on Giuliani&#x27;s &#x22;turf&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200710070002</link>
<description>Discussing Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton&#x27;s new television advertisement, Howard Kurtz began
an article:
&#x22;In a stark, black-and-white ad that pictures her in a mask at Ground
Zero, Hillary Rodham Clinton is treading on Rudy Giuliani&#x27;s turf.&#x22;
Similarly, on CNN&#x27;s
&#x3C;em&#x3E;American Morning&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, John Roberts said that Clinton&#x27;s ad &#x22;really is a shot across Rudy Giuliani&#x27;s bow
to say,
&#x27;You&#x27;re not the only one who has a claim to 9-11 here.&#x27;
 But is she going too far? Is she politicizing 9-11?&#x22; Roberts did not ask whether Giuliani, who has repeatedly discussed 9-11 in campaign settings,
 is &#x22;going too far&#x22; or &#x22;politicizing 9-11.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200710070002</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 7 Oct 2007 14:25:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash.  Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, CNN ignored  McConnell&#x27;s retraction on role of newly expanded FISA in German terror  arrests</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200709130007</link>
<description>After reporting on National Intelligence Director Mike McConnell&#x27;s claim that 
the recently approved law expanding the government&#x27;s ability to eavesdrop on 
U.S. citizens contributed to 
arrests in Germany, &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; and CNN have not 
subsequently reported that McConnell has since acknowledged that the newly 
passed law did not factor into the German arrests.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200709130007</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 16:03:22 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN failed to  detail Chertoff&#x27;s Katrina &#x22;problem&#x22; while discussing possible attorney general  appointment</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708280002</link>
<description>While 
discussing possible replacements for Alberto Gonzales, several CNN anchors and reporters cited DHS Secretary Michael 
Chertoff&#x27;s handling of the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina as a &#x22;potential 
problem&#x22; but did not provide any details regarding Chertoff&#x27;s mismanagement of 
the disaster. Indeed, two congressional reports specifically identified numerous failures by Chertoff and DHS in overseeing the 
government&#x27;s response.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708280002</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 20:50:43 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Citing Cheney  praise of Edelman letter, CNN left out Gates&#x27; refutation of attack on  Clinton</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708010009</link>
<description>In a report on the &#x22;dispute&#x22; between the Bush administration and Senator Hillary 
Rodham Clinton, CNN&#x27;s John Roberts stated that during an interview Vice 
President Cheney told Larry King that he &#x22;backed a Pentagon bureaucrat [Eric 
Edelman] who has accused Clinton of helping the 
enemy in Iraq.&#x22; But Roberts did not note that 
Edelman is a &#x22;former top aide&#x22; to Cheney, nor that, in contrast with Cheney, 
Defense Secretary Gates responded to Clinton that the Pentagon in no way 
&#x22;believe[s] that congressional oversight emboldens our 
enemies.&#x22;

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708010009</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Aug 2007 17:03:22 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN alleged &#x22;creative math&#x22; in Obama&#x27;s fundraising before debunking the allegation</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200707180004</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200707180004</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 14:40:47 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Will &#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Post &#x3C;/em&#x3E;reconsider its Supreme Court endorsement criteria after Roberts, Alito?</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200706300001</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington Post &#x3C;/em&#x3E;editorial board endorsed the nominations of John Roberts and Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court, asserting of Roberts that he possesses &#x22;a modest conception
of the judicial function and a strong belief in the stability of
precedent.&#x22; Since then, the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; has criticized several Supreme Court
decisions written by or joined by Roberts or Alito, claiming that they show a
lack of judicial restraint and fidelity to precedent. Yet the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; has given no indication that its
evaluation of either nominee was flawed, or that it intends to revisit its
criteria for evaluating Supreme Court nominees.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200706300001</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 20:54:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media reported Giuliani speech at Regent, but not Robertson&#x27;s controversial history</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200706270012</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200706270012</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 19:25:25 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s Roberts, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Cohen said Libby was &#x22;not&#x22; the leaker of Plame&#x27;s CIA identity</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200706190010</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200706190010</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 18:31:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s Roberts: &#x22;We do definitely know that Mitt Romney is pro-family&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200706190002</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200706190002</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 20:24:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media echoed, applauded Giuliani&#x27;s distortion of Paul&#x27;s comments about 9-11 attacks</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200705160009</link>
<description>Several media figures mischaracterized a response that Rep. Ron Paul gave at the Republican debate, with some asserting that Paul had &#x22;blamed&#x22;
the United
 States
for the 9-11 terrorist
attacks and others simply accepting Rudy Giuliani&#x27;s misrepresentation of Paul&#x27;s statement -- that the United
  States
had &#x22;invited the attack.&#x22; In
fact, Paul did not blame the United States for the 9-11 attacks or say that the United States
had &#x22;invited&#x22; them.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200705160009</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 17:25:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media heaped praise on Huckabee&#x27;s &#x22;sexual dig&#x22; at Edwards</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200705160005</link>
<description>Media figures and outlets heaped praise on Mike
Huckabee&#x27;s comment, during the May 15 Republican presidential debate,
that &#x22;[w]e&#x27;ve had a Congress that&#x27;s spent money like John
Edwards at a beauty shop,&#x22; a reference to reports that former Sen. John
Edwards spent $800 of campaign money (which Edwards said was reimbursed) on two
haircuts. ABC News&#x27; The Note, as well as &#x3C;em&#x3E;The
Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Mike Allen called the line an &#x22;instant
classic,&#x22; while &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s
Jonathan Martin predicted that it &#x22;will dominate the news coverage in the
days ahead.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200705160005</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 14:22:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>