<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Jonah Goldberg</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/jonah_goldberg</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Jonah Goldberg</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>Jonah Goldberg falsely claimed Obama &#x22;dodg[es] the word and concept of patriotism&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200803110010</link>
<description>Jonah Goldberg claimed that Democrats, and specifically Sen. Barack Obama, &#x22;cannot credibly talk of love of country while simultaneously dodging the word and concept of patriotism.&#x22; In fact, Obama has not &#x22;dodg[ed] the word and concept of patriotism&#x22; -- invoking them in numerous speeches going back to at least 2002.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200803110010</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:39:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>In &#x3C;em&#x3E;LA Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; column, Jonah Goldberg falsely asserted Obama&#x27;s &#x22;campaign headquarters in Houston had a Che Guevara-emblazoned Cuban flag hanging on the wall&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802260013</link>
<description>Jonah Goldberg falsely asserted that Sen. Barack Obama&#x27;s &#x22;campaign headquarters in Houston had a Che Guevara-emblazoned Cuban flag hanging on the wall.&#x22; In fact, the office in question is not &#x22;Obama&#x27;s campaign headquarters in Houston,&#x22; nor is it an official campaign office controlled by the Obama campaign.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802260013</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 20:36:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On CNN Headline News, Goldberg compared Obama, FDR to Hitler  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802250008</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Glenn Beck&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, National Review Online editor-at-large Jonah Goldberg said: &#x22;I think one of the things that is decidedly fascistic, or at least just a bad idea, is looking for silver bullets. You know, when [Sen.] Barack Obama campaigns, he&#x27;s basically saying, &#x27;I&#x27;m a silver bullet. I&#x27;m going to solve all your problems just by electing me.&#x27; FDR, Hitler, all these guys, they basically said, &#x27;All your problems can be solved.&#x27; &#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802250008</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 19:37:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Bound to repeat it: Conservative media cited &#x3C;em&#x3E;National Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E; &#x22;most liberal&#x22; rating in 2004, now touting 2007 rating  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802140003</link>
<description>In an email to readers encouraging recipients to read the &#x3C;em&#x3E;National Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article on the magazine&#x27;s 2007 vote ratings, the National Journal Group wrote: &#x22;In 2004, President Bush invoked Senator John Kerry&#x27;s liberal Vote Ratings score repeatedly on the campaign trail and at their head-to-head debates. We anticipate similar attention for our Vote Ratings across the 2008 election cycle.&#x22; Numerous media did follow suit and tout the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s 2003 rating of Kerry. And once again, the media are giving the 2007 ratings the &#x22;similar attention&#x22; the National Journal Group anticipated -- despite the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s acknowledgment that the methodology it used to rate Kerry was flawed.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802140003</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 12:56:48 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Goldberg on MSNBC: &#x22;Hillary Clinton is essentially like the agricultural minister from the Soviet Politburo&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200801170014</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Morning Joe&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Jonah Goldberg stated: &#x22;Hillary Clinton is essentially like the agricultural minister from the Soviet Politburo in 1976. She&#x27;s sort of, you know, the product of a sort of bureaucratic, Walter Mondale machine, &#x27;check off the right constituencies&#x27; kind of thing.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200801170014</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:56:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On MSNBC, Jonah Goldberg claimed &#x22;you can draw a line&#x22; from Mussolini to Clinton and Obama</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200801100016</link>
<description>Discussing his most recent book on MSNBC&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;Morning Joe&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, National Review Online  editor-at-large Jonah Goldberg said  that Benito Mussolini is tied to the American liberal movement  because he &#x22;was a socialist.&#x22; When co-host Joe Scarborough asked whether he was  suggesting &#x22;you can draw a line from Mussolini&#x22; to Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton  or to Sen. Barack Obama, Goldberg replied, &#x22;Well, I&#x27;m saying you can draw a  line, but it&#x27;s not a straight one.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200801100016</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 21:05:42 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>If Jonah Goldberg  hasn&#x27;t heard conservatives &#x22;deny the patriotism of the opposition,&#x22; he&#x27;s not  listening to Limbaugh</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200710030006</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Big Story&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, discussing Rush 
Limbaugh&#x27;s recent &#x22;phony soldiers&#x22; comments, Jonah Goldberg asserted: &#x22;I&#x27;ve never heard actually 
a conservative basically flat-out deny the patriotism of the opposition.&#x22; In 
fact, Limbaugh himself has done 
so. For instance, 
on his 
August 23, 2005, radio 
show, Limbaugh said, &#x22;It&#x27;s time for somebody to tell the people on the left, 
you&#x27;re damn right we&#x27;re questioning your patriotism.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200710030006</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Oct 2007 12:54:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Conservative media tout flawed poll to call Dems 9-11 conspiracy theorists</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200705160001</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200705160001</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 20:00:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Myths and falsehoods about Hillary Rodham Clinton</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200702130005</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200702130005</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 12:12:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Milbank, Goldberg falsely claimed Sen. Boxer &#x22;belittled&#x22; Rice for being &#x22;childless&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200701240004</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200701240004</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 12:27:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media figures repeat false claim that Armitage role in Plame leak exonerates Libby and Rove</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200609010001</link>
<description>Numerous media figures have asserted that a recent report purportedly identifying former deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage as Robert Novak&#x27;s original source for Valerie Plame&#x27;s identity as a CIA operative prove that Karl Rove and I. Lewis &#x22;Scooter&#x22; Libby were not involved in the leak of her identity. However, Armitage&#x27;s role as Novak&#x27;s first source is not inconsistent with Rove&#x27;s and Libby&#x27;s involvements in the leak -- both were original sources of the information for two other reporters.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200609010001</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 21:39:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Goldberg furthered Bush surveillance falsehoods</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200606280004</link>
<description>In his newest column, Jonah Goldberg furthered falsehoods and baseless assertions on the NSA&#x27;s warrantless domestic eavesdropping program, including writing that President Bush&#x27;s approval ratings &#x22;went up&#x22; following the public disclosure of the NSA program.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200606280004</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:05:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>O&#x27;Reilly, others smear veteran journalist Helen Thomas over exchange with Bush</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200603270001</link>
<description>After the contentious exchange between Hearst Newspapers columnist Helen Thomas and President Bush during Bush&#x27;s March 21 press conference, Fox News host Bill O&#x27;Reilly and several other conservative commentators rushed to attack Thomas. O&#x27;Reilly accused her of &#x22;hat[ing] Bush and try[ing] to undermine everything he does,&#x22; and even suggesting that if he were Bush, he &#x22;would have laid her out.&#x22; Several other conservative media figures -- including Jonah Goldberg, Fred Barnes, Glenn Beck, and Tucker Carlson -- have followed suit, sometimes with highly personal attacks.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200603270001</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2006 11:38:52 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Despite Bush&#x27;s heavy emphasis on WMD, Goldberg &#x22;baffle[d]&#x22; that WMD in Iraq &#x22;became the only argument&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200603240002</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Los Angeles Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; columnist Jonah Goldberg professed to be &#x22;baffle[d]&#x22; that &#x22;the only argument&#x22; that opponents of the Iraq war claim that President Bush made in justifying the March 2003 invasion of Iraq is that Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and planned to use them against the United States. In fact, it was Bush himself who stressed in the weeks leading up to the invasion that disarming and removing Saddam were necessary because of the threat that he would use WMD against the United States.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200603240002</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 09:13:11 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Despite lack of investigation, pundits dismissed concerns by Congress and the public over port deal</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200603030002</link>
<description>In recent days, numerous pundits have summarily dismissed concerns about the takeover of operations at six U.S. ports by a company owned by the government of Dubai, a member state of the United Arab Emirates, despite the fact that the Bush administration opted not to conduct the 45-day investigation into the deal&#x27;s national security implications provided for -- and, critics argue, required -- by federal law.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200603030002</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Mar 2006 12:22:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>