<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Jonathan Martin</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/jonathan_martin</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Jonathan Martin</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Smith, Martin reported McCain campaign&#x27;s claim that Obama would raise taxes on 21 million small businesses without noting it&#x27;s false     </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200807070001</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E; writers Ben Smith and Jonathan Martin reported a claim by Tucker Bounds, McCain campaign spokesman, that &#x22;Barack Obama wants more taxes from 21 million small businesses,&#x22; without noting that it is false. In fact, Obama has proposed rolling back President Bush&#x27;s tax cuts only on &#x22;people who are making 250,000 dollars a year or more,&#x22; and according to the nonpartisan Tax Policy  Center, 481,000 small businesses fall into the tax brackets that would be affected by those increases.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200807070001</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Jul 2008 11:56:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Martin again uncritically quoted &#x22;most liberal&#x22; charge against Obama  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806230004</link>
<description>Jonathan Martin uncritically quoted Regnery Publishing president Marjory Ross saying of Sen. Barack Obama, &#x22;He&#x27;s the No. 1 most liberal member of the U.S. Senate, and nobody has really examined his record.&#x22; Ross was apparently referring to the &#x3C;em&#x3E;National Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s 2007 Vote Ratings. Martin did not cite any criticism of the study&#x27;s subjectivity -- including criticism by Obama during a February interview with &#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico -- &#x3C;/em&#x3E;or note that a more comprehensive study reached a different result.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200806230004</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:54:25 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico &#x3C;/em&#x3E;still ignoring Obama rebuttal to &#x3C;em&#x3E;National Journal &#x3C;/em&#x3E;ranking, study&#x27;s subjectivity  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806050001</link>
<description>Ignoring its own interview with Sen. Barack Obama in which he criticized the &#x3C;em&#x3E;National Journal &#x3C;/em&#x3E;study, the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E; uncritically reported Sen. John McCain&#x27;s claim that Obama has the &#x22;most liberal voting record,&#x22; without citing any criticism of the study or noting that the ranking was based on subjectively selected votes.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200806050001</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Jun 2008 11:41:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Martin asserted as &#x22;fact&#x22; that Gore and Kerry &#x22;were elitists and were out of touch with average Americans&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200804120001</link>
<description>The &#x3C;em&#x3E;&#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x27;s&#x3C;/em&#x3E; &#x3C;/em&#x3E;Jonathan Martin asserted as &#x22;fact&#x22; that Al Gore and John Kerry &#x22;were elitists and were out of touch with average Americans.&#x22; But to the extent the public perceived the&#x3C;strong&#x3E;&#x3C;strong&#x3E;m&#x3C;/strong&#x3E;&#x3C;/strong&#x3E; in that manner, the media played a dominant role in creating and promoting that perception while largely avoiding discussion of whether President Bush was an &#x22;elitist.&#x22;    </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200804120001</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 16:00:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico &#x3C;/em&#x3E;devoted entire article to internal RNC polling that shows McCain with &#x22;a solid lead&#x22; over Clinton, Obama  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200804100009</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico &#x3C;/em&#x3E;senior political writer Jonathan Martin reported on Republican National Committee &#x22;[i]nternal polling data&#x22; showing Sen. John McCain &#x22;with a solid lead over both his potential general election rivals,&#x22; but Martin did not report -- nor did he give any indication that he had sought -- any additional information about the RNC&#x27;s data, or provide any justification for treating the results of an internal partisan poll as newsworthy.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200804100009</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 20:39:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s Foreman let Cliff May falsely accuse Dems of trying to prevent government from &#x22;bug[ging] terrorists and terrorist suspects abroad&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200803100003</link>
<description>On CNN&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;This Week in Politics&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Cliff May falsely asserted, unchallenged, that Nancy Pelosi &#x22;is not letting a vote come on&#x22; a &#x22;bipartisan bill passed by the Senate that would restore to intelligence agencies the authority they used to have to ... surveil, to bug terrorists and terrorist suspects abroad.&#x22; May further claimed, falsely, that Sens. Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama &#x22;have said they&#x27;re against this bill that would restore intelligence authority.&#x22; In fact, the U.S. government currently has the authority to eavesdrop on the communications of suspected terrorists through the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200803100003</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:21:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Martin said McCain has &#x22;reluctantly allowed his campaign&#x22; to highlight Vietnam experience -- but he showed little reluctance in 2000  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802060005</link>
<description>Comparing Sen. John McCain&#x27;s 2008 Republican presidential campaign to his failed 2000 bid, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E; senior political writer Jonathan Martin stated: &#x22;There is another reason why McCain&#x27;s fared better this time -- he reluctantly allowed his campaign to spotlight his 5 1/2 years in the Hanoi Hilton.&#x22; However, numerous reports in 2000 noted the prominent role McCain&#x27;s experience as a POW in Vietnam played in his first presidential campaign.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802060005</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Feb 2008 16:50:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Martin ignored Giuliani&#x27;s &#x22;pledge&#x22; not to attack Republicans; CBN&#x27;s Brody claimed Giuliani &#x22;is talking about Hillary Clinton and nobody else&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200710070001</link>
<description>In a
blog entry, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E; senior political writer Jonathan Martin wrote that
Rudy Giuliani&#x27;s
campaign had circulated a press release titled &#x22;Romney&#x27;s Taxachussetts
Hypocrisy&#x22; and characterized the campaign as &#x22;[n]ot terribly thrilled
about having to engage a GOP opponent -- but also recognizing the
necessity of letting no dig go unanswered.&#x22; However,
in the blog entry, Martin did not
note 
a relevant statement that Giuliani made two
days earlier in an interview with Martin himself:
&#x22;It&#x27;s my intention not to attack any other Republicans, absolutely. ...
The whole focus of my campaign is I&#x27;m going to run against a Democrat.&#x22;
On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Meet the Press&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, David Brody claimed that Giuliani &#x22;is talking about Hillary Clinton and nobody else,&#x22; adding: &#x22;I mean, it&#x27;s invoking the
Eleventh
Commandment, as Ronald Reagan would say, you know, thou shalt not speak ill of a fellow Republican.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200710070001</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 7 Oct 2007 14:08:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Martin: &#x22;Is Code Pink to the left  what the Westboro  Baptist Church is to the right?&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200709110002</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200709110002</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:30:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Martin touted  Giuliani&#x27;s &#x22;halo of Sept. 11 and the celebrity that comes with the  heroics&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200709050005</link>
<description>In an article on Republican candidates, the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Jonathan Martin claimed that 
the reason Rudy Giuliani has not &#x22;stopped being &#x27;America&#x27;s Mayor&#x27; &#x22; and become &#x22;just 
another presidential candidate&#x22; is &#x22;in part ... because he still enjoys the halo 
of Sept. 11 and the celebrity that comes with the heroics.&#x22; However, Giuliani&#x27;s 
performance before, during, and after 9-11 has been questioned and criticized.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200709050005</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 5 Sep 2007 13:52:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media flacks for McCain&#x27;s false &#x22;flak&#x22; attack on Obama&#x27;s spelling</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200705260002</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200705260002</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 20:13:49 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>