<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Juan Williams</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/juan_williams</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Juan Williams</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>  Echoing Rove, Williams claimed Obama ad &#x22;makes himself out to be born in Kansas&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200807070009</link>
<description>On&#x3C;em&#x3E; Fox News Sunday&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Juan Williams asserted of a recent campaign ad from Sen. Barack Obama: &#x22;He makes himself out to be born in Kansas, Kansas values. He&#x27;s in Hawaii.&#x22; However, as &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters for America &#x3C;/em&#x3E;has noted, in the ad, Obama does not &#x22;make[] himself out to be born in Kansas&#x22;; rather, he makes clear he was &#x22;raised&#x22; by his mother and grandparents, who &#x22;grew up&#x22; in Kansas. Karl Rove made a similar claim in a &#x3C;em&#x3E;Wall Street Journal &#x3C;/em&#x3E;op-ed.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200807070009</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Jul 2008 18:30:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>NPR&#x27;s Williams, Fox&#x27;s Morris asserted that McCain went against GOP on immigration without noting his reversals  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200805200003</link>
<description>NPR&#x27;s Juan Williams asserted that Sen. John McCain &#x22;has fought his own party, the GOP, on immigration.&#x22; And Fox News&#x27; Dick Morris stated that McCain &#x22;really has moved to the left of the Republican Party&#x22; on &#x22;the immigration bill.&#x22; However, neither Williams nor Morris mentioned that McCain has reversed his position on immigration and now asserts that &#x22;we&#x27;ve got to secure the borders first&#x22; -- a position at odds with his prior assertion that border security could not be disaggregated from other aspects of comprehensive immigration reform without being rendered ineffective.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200805200003</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 16:45:47 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On Fox News, Williams cited McCain&#x27;s immigration record as evidence of &#x22;working across party lines,&#x22; but not his abandonment of bipartisan position  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200805080010</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Special Report&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Juan Williams cited Sen. John McCain&#x27;s record on immigration as evidence of a willingness to &#x22;work[] across party lines,&#x22; without noting that McCain has said he no longer supports his own bipartisan bill. Williams then claimed that Sen. Barack Obama &#x22;doesn&#x27;t have a record&#x22; of &#x22;working across party lines.&#x22; In fact, Obama has co-sponsored bills with Republican Sens. Tom Coburn and Richard Lugar that have been signed into law.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200805080010</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 8 May 2008 18:55:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox News Sunday&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Kristol claimed Hagee and Parsley are &#x22;just individuals who&#x27;ve endorsed&#x22; McCain  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200803230004</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox News Sunday&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, when Bill Kristol was asked whether &#x22;it&#x27;s fair&#x22; to compare &#x22;[Sen. John] McCain&#x27;s, quote, &#x27;ministers,&#x27; &#x22; John Hagee and Rod Parsley, &#x22;to [Sen. Barack] Obama&#x27;s pastor,&#x22; Kristol replied: &#x22;No, because these are just individuals who&#x27;ve endorsed Senator McCain.&#x22; However, McCain stated in a joint appearance with Hagee that he was &#x22;very proud to have Pastor Hagee&#x27;s support&#x22; and reportedly called Parsley a &#x22;spiritual guide.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200803230004</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 18:18:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media outlets falsely claim Obama contradicted himself regarding Wright statements  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200803200004</link>
<description>Several media figures have falsely claimed that Sen. Barack Obama contradicted previous statements when he said during a March 18 speech on race: &#x22;Did I ever hear him [Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Obama&#x27;s former pastor] make remarks that could be considered controversial while I sat in the church? Yes.&#x22; In fact, Obama previously asserted he had not been present for particular statements Wright made that were repeated by various media outlets and that spurred the recent controversy. He did not claim to have never heard Wright make &#x22;remarks that could be considered controversial.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200803200004</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 15:42:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;NY Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27; new columnist Kristol said Clinton won because &#x22;[s]he pretended to cry&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200801090002</link>
<description>William Kristol attributed Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton&#x27;s victory in the New Hampshire Democratic primary to &#x22;the tears,&#x22; saying, &#x22;She pretended to cry; the women liked it.&#x22; He added, &#x22;The women were sorry for her, and she won.&#x22; Kristol is one of several media figures who described Clinton&#x27;s actions as &#x22;calculated,&#x22; reviving a characterization frequently made by the media that Clinton is &#x22;calculating.&#x22;    </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200801090002</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 9 Jan 2008 11:22:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Juan Williams,  Fox News and the NPR conundrum</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200710020005</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200710020005</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Oct 2007 12:40:02 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox News Sunday&#x3C;/em&#x3E; panel ignored Edwards&#x27; reasons for skipping Fox debate</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200703130013</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox News
Sunday&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, while discussing John Edwards&#x27; decision not to
participate in a Fox-sponsored Democratic debate in Nevada, panelists Bill Kristol, Juan
Williams, Brit Hume, and Nina Easton all ignored Edwards&#x27; specific criticism of Fox News.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200703130013</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 18:57:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Juan Williams, &#x3C;em&#x3E;NY Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; reported Bush&#x27;s purported explanation for &#x22;Democrat majority&#x22; in SOTU, but not his track record</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200701300010</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;The New York
Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; and National Public Radio&#x27;s Juan Williams, during his
interview with President Bush, failed to address the recurring pattern by Bush
and other Republicans of employing the proper noun &#x22;Democrat&#x22; as an
adjective -- an oft-used Republican slur.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200701300010</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 16:42:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fox&#x27;s Juan Williams repeated&#x3C;em&#x3E; NY Times&#x27; &#x3C;/em&#x3E;misrepresentation of Clinton approval rating</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200701220005</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200701220005</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 15:04:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox News Sunday&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Williams claimed Obama&#x27;s Muslim father &#x22;presents a problem&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200701220002</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200701220002</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 12:26:20 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Juan Williams on public telling pollsters it favors Democrats on taxes: &#x22;[T]o me, that&#x27;s crazy&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200611050004</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox News
Sunday&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, National Public Radio&#x27;s Juan Williams acknowledged
that &#x22;most people are telling pollsters that they trust the Democrats
more on taxes than they do the Republicans,&#x22;
but then said, &#x22;To me, that&#x27;s
crazy.&#x22; On &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Chris Matthews Show&#x3C;/em&#x3E;,
Chris Matthews again falsely suggested that the issue of taxes favors
Republicans, even though recent polling shows otherwise.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200611050004</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 5 Nov 2006 15:11:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On Fox, &#x22;liberal&#x22; Juan Williams asserted that it&#x27;s &#x22;true&#x22; CNN is &#x22;in the tank for the Democrats&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200610310017</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;The
O&#x27;Reilly Factor&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Juan Williams baselessly asserted that
it&#x27;s &#x22;true&#x22; CNN is, in Bill O&#x27;Reilly&#x27;s words,
&#x22;in the tank for the Democrats.&#x22; Williams added that CNN is
&#x22;counter-programming Fox&#x22; and that &#x22;they are becoming more and
more partisan, and they think that&#x27;s what we do here at Fox.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200610310017</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 17:13:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fox News personalities serve up a host of CIA leak falsehoods, taking cue from misleading &#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; editorial</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200609070011</link>
<description>Fox News anchors and commentators seized upon a &#x3C;em&#x3E;Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; editorial falsely asserting that the revelation that former Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage was the original source for syndicated columnist Robert D. Novak&#x27;s column exposing CIA operative Valerie Plame&#x27;s identity disproved the notion of a coordinated effort within the White House to discredit former ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV, using the occasion to repeat a host of false claims about the CIA leak case.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200609070011</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 7 Sep 2006 18:41:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media furthered false claim that Democrats have &#x22;no plan&#x22; for national security</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200609050003</link>
<description>Several media figures and news outlets have uncritically repeated or lent credence to the false Republican talking point that Democrats, for all their criticism of the Bush administration&#x27;s Iraq war policy, have no plan of their own to deal with Iraq, terrorism, and national security in general. In fact, Democrats have offered several plans for addressing various issues related to U.S. involvement in Iraq and national security.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200609050003</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 Sep 2006 15:32:03 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>