<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Karen Tumulty</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/karen_tumulty</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Karen Tumulty</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Time&#x3C;/em&#x3E; cited Mitchell in purporting to examine Clinton&#x27;s role in Northern Ireland peace process, but not Mitchell&#x27;s affirmation of Clinton&#x27;s statements  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200803130007</link>
<description>A &#x3C;em&#x3E;Time&#x3C;/em&#x3E; magazine article claimed that &#x22;several diplomatic sources&#x22; who worked on the Northern Ireland peace talks &#x22;say that the women&#x27;s groups&#x22; with whom Hillary Clinton engaged during the process &#x22;were not nearly as pivotal to the process as Hillary&#x27;s backers maintain&#x22; and that former Sen. George Mitchell was &#x22;much more involved in those efforts.&#x22; But the article failed to mention that Mitchell has said that Clinton&#x27;s statements regarding her role in the peace process &#x22;are generally accurate to the extent that they have been relayed to me.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200803130007</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 18:41:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media failed to  resolve question  of  which  members  of  Congress  Freedom&#x27;s  Watch  ads  are  targeting</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708240012</link>
<description>In reports on a recent advertisement buy by Freedom&#x27;s Watch in support of the Iraq 
war, media reports have 
failed to resolve the question of which members of Congress the ad buys are 
targeting, despite the apparent newsworthiness of the issue. For instance, 
&#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; suggested that the ad 
campaign 
is 
an 
attack 
on 
Democrats, 
a 
suggestion repeated 
by 
&#x3C;em&#x3E;Time&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Karen Tumulty; other reports have not even mentioned the issue; while still others have asserted that the ads target both Democrats and Republicans. However, according to analyses by war opponents, the buys 
target mainly Republicans, a charge Freedom&#x27;s Watch called &#x22;propaganda by our 
enemies.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708240012</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 19:51:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s Schneider, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, and &#x3C;em&#x3E;Time&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Tumulty misled on gun-control politics</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200704180001</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200704180001</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 13:49:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Tumulty responds to Olbermann&#x27;s &#x22;worst person&#x22; bronze and &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200704130007</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200704130007</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 14:03:02 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Tumulty suggested Clinton is using Imus controversy to raise money</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200704110014</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200704110014</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 19:52:02 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Despite public support, NPR&#x27;s Diane Rehm and &#x3C;em&#x3E;Time&#x27;s&#x3C;/em&#x3E; Karen Tumulty claimed &#x22;backlash&#x22; against Edwardses</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200704020009</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200704020009</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 Apr 2007 18:01:06 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Tumulty said it&#x27;s &#x22;absurd&#x22; to attack U.S. press for not challenging Bush, while Froomkin praised U.K. press&#x27; &#x22;different tack&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200612080009</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200612080009</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 8 Dec 2006 17:43:35 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Time&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Duffy and Tumulty declare Republicans lost, in part, for &#x22;spending like drunken Democrats&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200611080003</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200611080003</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Nov 2006 11:16:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Time&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Tumulty reported as fact that Kerry &#x22;insulted&#x22; U.S. troops</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200611010010</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200611010010</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Nov 2006 14:47:02 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media: National security is a right-wing value</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200602280002</link>
<description>Several journalists and media figures have taken to describing Democratic criticism of the Bush administration&#x27;s approval of a deal allowing state-owned Dubai Ports World to assume control of six major U.S. ports as an attempt by Democrats to move &#x22;to the right&#x22; of President Bush and Republicans in Congress on issues of national security. In fact, some of the Democrats who have most strongly denounced the deal have been among the most active proponents of enhancing port security since the 9-11 terrorist attacks.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200602280002</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 12:28:34 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>