<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Kate O&#x27;Beirne</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/kate_o_beirne</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Kate O&#x27;Beirne</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>Margaret Carlson: Dems don&#x27;t have enough &#x22;authentic&#x22; people</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200701250007</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200701250007</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 15:13:06 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media claim Bush administration has disavowed &#x22;stay the course&#x22; rhetoric, but White House is still using it</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608310012</link>
<description>Several media figures have recently claimed, or let Republicans claim, that the White House &#x22;rejects&#x22; the policy that the United States should &#x22;stay the course&#x22; in Iraq, even though President Bush and White House spokesman Tony Snow have continued to use that term to describe the administration&#x27;s Iraq policy.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608310012</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 19:02:58 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, O&#x27;Beirne misrepresented public support for Iraq timetable</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608280007</link>
<description>A &#x3C;em&#x3E;Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article misrepresented polling to state that the public is &#x22;evenly split&#x22; on withdrawing from Iraq. Similarly, &#x3C;em&#x3E;National Review&#x3C;/em&#x3E; Washington editor Kate O&#x27;Beirne falsely claimed on NBC&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;Meet the Press&#x3C;/em&#x3E; that the public does &#x22;not support leaving prematurely, and a timetable to do so.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608280007</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 17:06:09 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media coverage of Iraq debate steeped in GOP talking points</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200606300009</link>
<description>A &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E; analysis of the media coverage of the Iraq war debate shows that the favored Republican talking points on Iraq have gone largely unchallenged in the media and have even been adopted as truths by some media outlets and figures.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200606300009</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 17:31:32 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>O&#x27;Beirne: Fighting wars &#x22;a job for men, not women&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200603210004</link>
<description>On American Family Radio&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;Today&#x27;s Issues&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, &#x3C;em&#x3E;National Review&#x3C;/em&#x3E; Washington editor Kate O&#x27;Beirne asserted that &#x22;fighting our wars, engaging the enemy in this uncivilized thing we call war is a job for men, not women,&#x22; then suggested that having women serve in the military was the equivalent of &#x22;a man send[ing] his wife or daughter to check out&#x22; a noise that &#x22;sounds like a break-in.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200603210004</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 09:56:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media accused liberals of politicizing King funeral, ignored conservatives&#x27; use of Reagan funeral</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200602090007</link>
<description>Numerous media figures highlighted the alleged &#x22;partisan&#x22; nature of Coretta Scott King&#x27;s funeral but failed to comment on the politicization of Ronald Reagan&#x27;s funeral.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200602090007</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Feb 2006 16:01:11 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>