<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Kit Seelye</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/kit_seelye</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Kit Seelye</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;NY  Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;  Seelye, public editor give conflicting reports on whether &#x3C;em&#x3E;Times &#x3C;/em&#x3E;promised to run Giuliani ad on  specific day</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200709260012</link>
<description>In a &#x3C;em&#x3E;New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article, Katharine Q. Seelye reported that 
MoveOn.org paid the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Times &#x3C;/em&#x3E;$77,508 
for its controversial General Betray Us&#x22; ad, and that 
Rudy Giuliani&#x27;s campaign said it &#x22;would not pay the difference&#x22; between the 
&#x22;standby&#x22; rate and its regular rate for an ad it ran in response to MoveOn.org&#x27;s 
because the&#x3C;em&#x3E; Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; &#x22;did not 
guarantee when it would run&#x22; Giuliani&#x27;s ad. But three days earlier, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; public editor Clark Hoyt had written that 
Giuliani &#x22;demanded space in the following Friday&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; to answer MoveOn.org&#x22; and &#x22;got it.&#x22; 
Further, Seelye herself had previously reported Giuliani&#x27;s intention to request 
space in that day&#x27;s paper for a rebuttal ad.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200709260012</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 16:54:02 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;NY Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27; Seelye falsely claimed Clinton favorable ratings &#x22;never climbed higher&#x22; than 50 percent</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708170013</link>
<description>In a post on
the &#x3C;em&#x3E;New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;
blog The Caucus, Katharine Q. Seelye
falsely claimed that Hillary Rodham Clinton&#x27;s &#x22;favorable ratings
reached a peak of 50 [percent] in 1998 during her husband&#x27;s impeachment.
They have never climbed higher, as measured by The Times and CBS.&#x22; In fact, a January 1999 CBS News poll found that Clinton had a favorable
rating of 55 percent. Additionally,
other polls from the same period found Clinton&#x27;s favorable rating rising
as high as 67 percent, and polls from
other organizations show her favorable rating has topped 50 percent in 2007.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708170013</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 17:36:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Serial misinformer Kit Seelye reportedly set to become &#x3C;em&#x3E;NY Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; &#x22;Web political correspondent&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200703090004</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200703090004</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 Mar 2007 13:39:43 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>