<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Martha Raddatz</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/martha_raddatz</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Martha Raddatz</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>Media uncritically reported White House claim that Dems chose &#x22;confrontation&#x22; in issuing wiretapping subpoenas</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200706290003</link>
<description>In their reports on subpoenas issued by the Senate Judiciary
Committee over the Bush administration&#x27;s warrantless wiretapping program,
media outlets uncritically quoted the
White House claim that &#x22;[i]t&#x27;s unfortunate that congressional
Democrats continue to choose the route of confrontation&#x22; to suggest that
Democrats were solely responsible for the committee&#x27;s action. In fact,
three Republicans voted with the Democrats to approve the subpoenas.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200706290003</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:14:59 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>ABC&#x27;s Raddatz baselessly claimed that national security seems &#x22;a bit of a foreign language&#x22; for Democrats</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200705010012</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200705010012</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 1 May 2007 19:46:35 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media continued reports of Pelosi &#x22;trip trouble,&#x22; ignored Republican-led delegation</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200704040016</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200704040016</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 4 Apr 2007 19:49:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>ABC, NBC uncritically reported Bush&#x27;s latest Iraqi troop readiness goal</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200701110003</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200701110003</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 20:16:25 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>ABC&#x27;s Raddatz echoed Bush on another &#x22;new strategy for victory&#x22; in Iraq</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200701030010</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200701030010</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Jan 2007 13:50:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Bush acknowledged he lied about Rumsfeld, but media refused to call him on it</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200611100005</link>
<description>Reporting on President Bush&#x27;s announcement of
Donald Rumsfeld&#x27;s resignation, media outlets, with few exceptions, have
avoided characterizing Bush&#x27;s assertion the previous week that he wanted
Rumsfeld to stay on as a &#x22;lie&#x22; or intentional misrepresentation --
this, despite Bush&#x27;s own admission of a deliberate deception. Some
outlets even failed to acknowledge Bush&#x27;s previous statement that
Rumsfeld would stay on as defense secretary until the end of his presidency.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200611100005</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Nov 2006 20:23:52 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>ABC, NBC morning shows suggested -- contrary to administration statements -- that Bush will reconsider Iraq policy</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200611070010</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200611070010</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 Nov 2006 13:15:43 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>ABC &#x3C;em&#x3E;World News&#x3C;/em&#x3E; ignored Democratic criticism of detainee bill; NBC, CBS downplayed story altogether</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200610180017</link>
<description>In her report on President Bush&#x27;s signing of the controversial detainee bill, ABC&#x27;s Martha Raddatz noted Sen. Russ Feingold&#x27;s general opposition to the bill but gave no indication of Feingold&#x27;s specific criticism -- that the bill &#x22;allows the government to seize individuals on American soil and detain them indefinitely with no opportunity to challenge their detention in court.&#x22; Nightly news broadcasts on NBC and CBS devoted little attention to the bill&#x27;s signing and ignored Democratic criticism of it altogether.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200610180017</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 18:29:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Network news coverage of declassified NIE fraught with misinformation, GOP talking points</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200609270012</link>
<description>Evening newscasts on ABC and NBC uncritically aired President Bush&#x27;s nonsensical non-responses to questions about declassified portions of a National Intelligence Estimate; NBC and CBS presented misleading reports on the NIE&#x27;s conclusions, both asserting that the declassified portion of the report at least in part backs up Bush.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200609270012</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:14:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media ignored Bush&#x27;s vow that &#x22;[w]e&#x27;re not leaving&#x22; Iraq &#x22;so long as I&#x27;m the president&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608220005</link>
<description>Various media outlets ignored President Bush&#x27;s statement during an August 21 press conference that the United States will not withdraw its forces from Iraq as long as he is president. Those outlets simply reported that Bush pledged to keep U.S. forces in Iraq until &#x22;the mission is complete,&#x22; and offered no indication that Bush pledged to keep troops there for the remainder of his term.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608220005</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 16:18:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>ABC featured only conservatives defending &#x22;necessity&#x22; of warrantless surveillance program</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608180008</link>
<description>An ABC &#x3C;em&#x3E;World News&#x3C;/em&#x3E; report on a federal district judge&#x27;s ruling that the Bush administration&#x27;s warrantless domestic surveillance program is unconstitutional featured only Bush administration officials and a senior research fellow from the conservative Heritage Foundation defending the &#x22;necessity&#x22; of the program. The report did not note that the program&#x27;s effectiveness has been called into question.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608180008</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 16:43:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Reporting on terror arrests in Britain, numerous media outlets ask: Will the news help Bush?</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608150008</link>
<description>In the wake of the recent thwarting of an alleged terrorist plot in Britain, numerous media outlets have posed the question of whether news of the event would benefit President Bush, often letting conservatives or Republican officials spin the news in favor of the administration. Many of the reports neglected to consider whether the news could actually hurt Bush politically.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608150008</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:23:15 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>ABC&#x27;s Raddatz suggested that Democrats can&#x27;t support Iraq withdrawal and &#x22;support the troops&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608130001</link>
<description>On ABC&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;This Week&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Martha Raddatz argued that Democrats &#x22;don&#x27;t want&#x22; to call for the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq because &#x22;the lesson from Vietnam ... was you have to support the troops or there&#x27;s tremendous backlash.&#x22; This is not the first time the media have suggested that opposition to the Iraq war and support for U.S. troops are mutually exclusive positions.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608130001</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 13 Aug 2006 13:45:34 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>