<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Meet the Press</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/meet_the_press</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Meet the Press</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;&#x3C;em&#x3E;Meet the Press&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Williams allowed Graham to crop Obama&#x27;s questionnaire response on public funding  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806220001</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Meet the Press&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, host Brian Williams allowed Sen. Lindsey Graham to crop an answer Sen. Barack Obama gave on a Midwest Democracy Network questionnaire about whether he would commit to public financing for the general election if his opponent did so. While Graham read the question and beginning of Obama&#x27;s answer aloud, neither he nor Williams noted that Obama concluded his answer by saying he would &#x22;aggressively pursue an agreement with the Republican nominee to preserve a publicly financed general election,&#x22; which the Obama campaign maintains he did before determining an agreement with the McCain campaign was unreachable.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200806220001</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 18:45:02 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ignoring reversal, O&#x27;Donnell said McCain &#x22;believes he&#x27;s stronger among Hispanic-Americans, especially because of his immigration stance&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806080001</link>
<description>NBC&#x27;s Kelly O&#x27;Donnell asserted that Sen. John McCain &#x22;believes he&#x27;s stronger&#x3C;strong&#x3E;&#x3C;strong&#x3E;&#x22; &#x3C;/strong&#x3E;&#x3C;/strong&#x3E;than Sen. Barack Obama&#x3C;strong&#x3E;&#x3C;strong&#x3E; &#x22;&#x3C;/strong&#x3E;&#x3C;/strong&#x3E;among Hispanic-Americans, especially because of his immigration stance, which nearly killed him in the Republican Party.&#x22; But O&#x27;Donnell did not note that McCain reversed himself on the issue of immigration; he now says that &#x22;we&#x27;ve got to secure the borders first&#x22; and that he &#x22;would not&#x22; support his own comprehensive immigration reform legislation.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200806080001</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 8 Jun 2008 14:14:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Amid spate of high-profile stories, Russert continues to ignore &#x22;the story about Senator McCain and lobbyists and ethics and money&#x22; on &#x3C;em&#x3E;Meet the Press&#x3C;/em&#x3E;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200805280004</link>
<description>NBC News Washington bureau chief Tim Russert, who in February stated that &#x22;the story about Senator [John] McCain and lobbyists and ethics and money -- that continues,&#x22; again ignored the issue of &#x22;McCain and lobbyists and ethics and money&#x22; on the May 25 edition of &#x3C;em&#x3E;Meet the Press&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, despite numerous recent, related developments bearing on that issue.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200805280004</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 15:00:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Russert: &#x22;[T]he story about Senator McCain and lobbyists and ethics and money -- that continues&#x22; -- but not on &#x3C;em&#x3E;Meet the Press&#x3C;/em&#x3E;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200805230005</link>
<description>On February 24, Tim Russert stated on NBC&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;Today&#x3C;/em&#x3E; that &#x22;the story about Senator [John] McCain and lobbyists and ethics and money -- that continues. It&#x27;s been on the front page of several papers for the last three days. ... We have not heard the end of that discussion about Senator McCain.&#x22; However, since that date, &#x22;the story&#x22; has not &#x22;continue[d]&#x22; on &#x3C;em&#x3E;Meet the Press&#x3C;/em&#x3E;.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200805230005</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 15:17:16 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>      On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Meet the Press&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Russert allowed GOP strategist Murphy to falsely claim that &#x22;Rubin mischaracterized,&#x22; &#x22;paraphrased&#x22; McCain  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200805180002</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Meet the Press&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Tim Russert failed to correct Mike Murphy&#x27;s false claim that James Rubin &#x22;mischaracterized&#x22; Sen. John McCain in a &#x3C;em&#x3E;Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; op-ed. Russert said, &#x22;And there is an interview with James Rubin, as you know, from Senator McCain where he said that in time, we would have to talk with Hamas.&#x22; Murphy replied, &#x22;Right. Well, but I think if you look, like many of us did, at the full YouTube of that, Rubin mischaracterized him in his op-ed. ... McCain had a lot of qualifications, if you look at the full context of it, which is not what Rubin paraphrased in that op-ed.&#x22; In fact, Rubin did not &#x22;mischaracterize[]&#x22; or &#x22;paraphrase[]&#x22; McCain&#x27;s comments, as video posted on YouTube shows.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200805180002</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 17:11:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Will Russert offer Libertarian candidate Barr the same &#x3C;em&#x3E;Meet the Press&#x3C;/em&#x3E; platform he gave Nader?  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200805130004</link>
<description>Now that former Republican congressman Bob Barr has announced his candidacy for the Libertarian Party nomination for president, will NBC host Tim Russert invite Barr to be interviewed on &#x3C;em&#x3E;Meet the Press&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, giving Barr the same platform to discuss his candidacy that Russert gave Ralph Nader?  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200805130004</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 14:05:11 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Russert suggested GOP would run ads against Obama featuring &#x22;Pledge of Allegiance&#x22; charge without noting it&#x27;s false  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200804200001</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Meet the Press&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Tim Russert asserted that &#x22;many Democrats fear Republicans in the fall will string together an ad which shows,&#x22; among other things, &#x22;[Sen.] Barack Obama with his hands clasped in front of him rather than holding his heart during the Pledge of Allegiance.&#x22; However, the photo to which Russert was apparently referring appeared in &#x3C;em&#x3E;Time&#x3C;/em&#x3E; magazine with a caption indicating it was taken during the national anthem, not the Pledge of Allegiance.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200804200001</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 16:12:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Brooks, Broder praised McCain&#x27;s rebuke of Bush-style unilateralism, but didn&#x27;t mention McCain&#x27;s past comments attacking allies who opposed Iraq war</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200803300003</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;The New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27; David Brooks asserted that Sen. John McCain&#x27;s March 26 foreign policy speech &#x22;was so important because he broke with Bush on several ways&#x22; and described one of those ways as, &#x22;Should the U.S. go it alone on certain issues? He said no, we are -- we need a strong America, but in the community of nations. And he detailed that.&#x22; Similarly,&#x3C;em&#x3E; The Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s David Broder wrote that McCain &#x22;outlin[ed] a vastly different approach from President Bush&#x27;s&#x22; in the speech, in part by offering a &#x22;repudiation of unilateralism.&#x22; Yet neither Brooks nor Broder accounted for any of the statements McCain made during the run-up to the Iraq war about France, Germany, and Belgium, which revealed a very different attitude to U.S. allies.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200803300003</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 18:03:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>After repeatedly asking Obama about Farrakhan during debate, Russert ignored guest&#x27;s reference to Hagee&#x27;s endorsement of McCain on &#x3C;em&#x3E;Meet the Press&#x3C;/em&#x3E;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200803030006</link>
<description>On&#x3C;em&#x3E; Meet the Press&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, host Tim Russert ignored Republican strategist Mike Murphy&#x27;s reference to Sen. John McCain&#x27;s acceptance of an endorsement by evangelist John Hagee. Russert did not identify Hagee by name or mention Hagee&#x27;s statements denouncing or disparaging homosexuality, Islam, Catholics, and women. By contrast, during the last Democratic debate, Russert persisted with questions to Sen. Barack Obama about Louis Farrakhan&#x27;s support of Obama, despite Obama&#x27;s repeated denunciations of Farrakhan&#x27;s statements.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200803030006</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 3 Mar 2008 16:51:25 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Russert misquoted Clinton one day, falsely stated Clinton&#x27;s and Obama&#x27;s positions on NAFTA the next  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200803020004</link>
<description>On&#x3C;em&#x3E; The Tim Russert Show&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Russert falsely claimed that Sen. Hillary Clinton said in 2004: &#x22;[O]n &#x3C;em&#x3E;substance&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, NAFTA&#x27;s been good for New York and America.&#x22; In fact, what Clinton said in 2004 was: &#x22;I think on &#x3C;em&#x3E;balance&#x3C;/em&#x3E; NAFTA has been good for New York and America&#x3C;strong&#x3E;, &#x3C;/strong&#x3E;but I also think that there are a number of areas where we&#x27;re not dealt with in an upfront way.&#x22; On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Meet the Press&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Russert claimed that a video clip showed Clinton and Sen. Barack Obama &#x22;coming out against NAFTA&#x22;; as the clips made clear, neither candidate &#x22;c[ame] out against NAFTA.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200803020004</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 2 Mar 2008 19:07:06 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Meet the Press&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Brooks suggested McCain &#x22;only wrote two letters&#x22; as Commerce chairman  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802240003</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Meet the Press&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, discussing the &#x3C;em&#x3E;New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article about Sen. John McCain&#x27;s relationship with a lobbyist, David Brooks said he &#x22;do[esn&#x27;t] really understand the case&#x22; involving McCain and the letters he wrote to the Federal Communications Commission about an issue involving Paxson Communications, then suggested that McCain &#x22;only wrote two letters&#x22; as chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee. But the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Times &#x3C;/em&#x3E;reported that McCain sent a series of letters to the FCC in a separate case, including &#x22;an unusually blunt letter to the head of the Federal Communications Commission, warning that he would try to overhaul the agency if it closed a broadcast ownership loophole.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802240003</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 19:31:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Russert let McCain mislead on Clinton&#x27;s Iraq withdrawal proposal  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200801280011</link>
<description>Tim Russert left unchallenged Sen. John McCain&#x27;s false claim that Sen. Hillary Clinton &#x22;would set a timetable within 60 days of withdrawal, complete withdrawal from Iraq.&#x22; In fact, Clinton said that if she were to become president, &#x22;[W]e will start withdrawing within 60 days,&#x22; and would continue to withdraw &#x22;one to two brigades a month&#x22; with the goal of having &#x22;nearly all the troops out by the end of the year [2009],&#x22; except for those necessary to &#x22;protect our embassy&#x22; and other &#x22;strategic interests.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200801280011</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:39:03 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>York asserted that SC white men who did not vote for Clinton &#x22;voted against&#x22; her  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200801280007</link>
<description>In another example of a media figure asserting that primary or caucus voters who chose a candidate other than Sen. Hillary Clinton were thus rejecting her,&#x3C;em&#x3E; National Review&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Byron York asserted that in South Carolina, &#x22;72 percent of white men voted against&#x22; Clinton. York did not point to any evidence that the white men who voted for someone other than Clinton did so because they were &#x22;vot[ing] against her.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200801280007</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 14:15:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Noonan asserted  &#x22;Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton&#x22; is a &#x22;sickness&#x22; that &#x22;is giving so many people  pause&#x22;    </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200801210003</link>
<description>Discussing &#x22;dynasticism&#x22; on NBC&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;Meet the  Press&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Wall Street  Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E; columnist Peggy Noonan asserted that &#x22;this  Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton&#x22; is a &#x22;sickness&#x22; that &#x22;is giving so many people  pause.&#x22; But when asked how they felt about members of the Bush and Clinton  families holding the presidency for nearly 20 years, 50 percent of respondents  in a recent &#x3C;em&#x3E;New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;/CBS  News poll said it &#x22;doesn&#x27;t really make much difference.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200801210003</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:30:25 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Brokaw falsely claimed Giuliani&#x27;s Florida ads &#x22;don&#x27;t mention terrorism&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200801200004</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Meet the Press&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Tom Brokaw claimed that Rudy Giuliani&#x27;s television ads airing in Florida &#x22;don&#x27;t mention terrorism.&#x22; In fact, just two days earlier, the Giuliani  campaign launched a new ad, airing in West Palm Beach, that contains video footage of New York City in the aftermath of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200801200004</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:48:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>