<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Megyn Kendall</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/megyn_kendall</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Megyn Kendall</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>Fox&#x27;s Megyn Kendall falsely suggested that those briefed on NSA warrantless spying program &#x22;don&#x27;t see any problem&#x22; with it</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200612150007</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Big Story&#x3C;/em&#x3E;,
Fox News&#x27; Megyn Kendall reported that, during a speech, Sen. Patrick Leahy criticized
the National Security Agency&#x27;s warrantless domestic eavesdropping
program, even though, she later claimed, he &#x22;doesn&#x27;t know that much
about&#x22; it. She later falsely suggested that &#x22;those who have been
briefed on the program don&#x27;t see any problem&#x22; with it. In fact, several
members of the House and Senate committees have criticized the program.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200612150007</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 16:15:15 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media reported Chafee&#x27;s primary victory as posing a challenge only to Democrats, ignored strong showing by Whitehouse</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200609150004</link>
<description>In their reporting on incumbent Sen. Lincoln Chafee&#x27;s (R-RI) win in the September 12 Republican primary, ABC, CBS, and Fox News reported Chafee&#x27;s win as making the state more challenging for Democrats to win the seat, while failing to note that Chafee&#x27;s victory by no means assures his re-election and that Chafee&#x27;s Democratic challenger got more votes in the primary than Chafee and his Republican primary challenger combined.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200609150004</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 12:30:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fox&#x27;s Kendall uncritically reported Rep. Norwood&#x27;s false claim that under the Senate immigration bill, &#x22;[a]ll you got to do is come across the border [and] you can become a citizen&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608180010</link>
<description>Fox News reporter Megyn Kendall uncritically reported Rep. Charles Norwood&#x27;s (R-GA) false claim that under the Senate immigration bill, &#x22;[a]ll you got to do is come across the border [and] you can become a citizen.&#x22; In fact, the bill would grant a path to citizenship only to illegal immigrants who have lived in the United States for more than five years and who hold jobs, pass criminal background checks, learn English, and pay fines and back taxes.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608180010</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 18:00:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fox&#x27;s Kendall adopted misleading Bush administration talking point on signing statements</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200606290004</link>
<description>Fox News&#x27; Megyn Kendall adopted the Bush administration&#x27;s misleading defense of its controversial and frequent use of &#x22;signing statements&#x22; to challenge newly passed laws -- that throughout history, &#x22;presidents have often issued signing statements when they sign a bill into law.&#x22; But Kendall failed to mention that Bush has, in his signing statements, challenged more individual statutes than all other previous presidents combined, and Bush has far more frequently used signing statements &#x22;to waive his obligation to follow&#x22; even clear provisions in the law he just signed.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200606290004</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 15:54:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>