<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Michael Gerson</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/michael_gerson</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Michael Gerson</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>Blasting Franken&#x27;s &#x22;vulgarity,&#x22; &#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Gerson touted McCain&#x27;s &#x22;civility,&#x22; ignoring McCain&#x27;s &#x22;vulgarity&#x22; and tolerance of it  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806190011</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; columnist Michael Gerson criticized senatorial candidate Al Franken for what he called Franken&#x27;s &#x22;offensive vulgarity&#x22; and wrote: &#x22;At its best, politics can offer examples of civility and generosity that challenge selfishness and prejudice -- the tradition so far embraced by both John McCain and Barack Obama.&#x22; However, Gerson ignored McCain&#x27;s previous personal attacks on Sen. Hillary Clinton, including McCain&#x27;s reported telling of this joke at a 1998 fundraiser: &#x22;Why is Chelsea Clinton so ugly? Because her father is Janet Reno.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200806190011</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 19:01:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Gerson suggested Obama should &#x22;come out strongly for policies that would reduce the number of abortions&#x22; -- even though he already has  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200804020009</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; columnist Michael Gerson suggested that Sen. Barack Obama should &#x22;come out strongly for policies that would reduce the number of abortions -- support for pregnant women, abstinence education, the responsible promotion of birth control.&#x22; In fact, Obama has advocated the policies Gerson mentioned: &#x22;education&#x22; that &#x22;include[s] abstinence&#x22; and &#x22;information about contraception.&#x22;    </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200804020009</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 2 Apr 2008 20:31:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Gerson falsely claimed Clinton said Catholics &#x22;somehow responsible for abortion in America&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200709270009</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200709270009</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 13:17:47 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ignoring Obama speech to evangelical church, Gerson criticized him for &#x22;not effectively reach[ing] out to&#x22; evangelicals</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200707020001</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200707020001</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 Jul 2007 13:11:52 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; hired Bush speechwriter Gerson but never corrected Gerson&#x27;s Iraq falsehoods repeated on its editorial page</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200609220013</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; has hired Michael Gerson -- who as President Bush&#x27;s chief speechwriter from 2001-2005 crafted the false and misleading rhetoric the Bush administration used to justify the 2003 invasion of Iraq -- to be an op-ed columnist. The &#x3C;em&#x3E;Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; editorial board repeated without question some of that false and misleading rhetoric in its support of the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq and has passed up several opportunities to re-examine its support of the Bush administration&#x27;s push for war.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200609220013</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 16:44:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; reported Perkins&#x27;s claim that &#x22;liberal policymakers find themselves&#x22; in a &#x22;pickle&#x22; when reconciling their &#x22;policy positions&#x22; and &#x22;faith&#x22; -- didn&#x27;t note similar GOP difficulties</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200609200008</link>
<description>A &#x3C;em&#x3E;Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article reported Tony Perkins&#x27;s assertion that &#x22;liberal policymakers find themselves&#x22; in a &#x22;pickle&#x22; when talking about faith because &#x22;they get pinned down on their policy positions,&#x22; which are &#x22;inconsistent with the tenets of their faith.&#x22; But the article did not quote any progressive religious organizations in response to Perkins&#x27;s claim, even though previous reports in the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; have suggested that conservative policymakers should be in a similar &#x22;pickle&#x22; for backing a number of policies that appear to be inconsistent with their faith.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200609200008</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 17:10:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>