<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Mike Allen</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/mike_allen</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Mike Allen</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Allen misrepresented Obama&#x27;s April 16 debate response on &#x22;disown[ing]&#x22; Wright comments  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200804290002</link>
<description>Reporting on a speech by Rev. Jeremiah Wright Jr., Sen. Barack Obama&#x27;s former pastor,&#x3C;em&#x3E; Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Mike Allen misrepresented Obama&#x27;s April 16 debate response on &#x22;disown[ing]&#x22; Wright&#x27;s controversial remarks by writing, &#x22;Obama referred to Wright as &#x27;somebody who is associated with me that I have disowned,&#x27; then clarified that to say he had disowned the comments.&#x22; Allen left out the first part of Obama&#x27;s sentence: &#x22;[T]he notion that somehow that the American people are going to be distracted once again by comments not made by me but somebody who is associated with me that I have disowned, I think doesn&#x27;t give the American people enough credit.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200804290002</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 13:33:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Mike Allen again promotes myth of McCain as straight-talker, who &#x22;resist[s] pandering&#x22;    </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200803260008</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Mike Allen wrote, &#x22;It looks like Senator [John] McCain will resist pandering when he speaks later today on the housing crisis.&#x22; Allen cited prepared remarks in which McCain said: &#x22;Let&#x27;s start with some straight talk. I will not play election year politics with the housing crisis,&#x22; and claimed that he has &#x22;always been committed to the principle that it is not the duty of government to bail out and reward those who act irresponsibly, whether they are big banks or small borrowers.&#x22; But Allen has yet to note that McCain said he does not think the Federal Reserve acted improperly by extending a $30 billion line of credit to facilitate the acquisition of the near-bankrupt investment bank Bear Stearns by JP Morgan Chase.    </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200803260008</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 18:54:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Allen touted McCain campaign assertion that Obama &#x22;is the most liberal senator in the United   States Senate&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802200005</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Hannity &#x26;amp; Colmes&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Mike Allen uncritically quoted an assertion by Sen. John McCain&#x27;s campaign manager that Sen. Barack Obama &#x22;is the most liberal senator in the United States Senate&#x22; -- presumably a reference to &#x3C;em&#x3E;&#x3C;em&#x3E;National Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s 2007 vote ratings. By repeating the McCain campaign&#x27;s invocation of the &#x3C;em&#x3E;National Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E; vote ratings, Allen joined Karl Rove, Pat Buchanan, and other conservative media figures in promoting the ratings, as &#x3C;em&#x3E;National Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E; anticipated the media would.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802200005</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:45:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Allen cited &#x3C;em&#x3E;Women&#x27;s Wear Daily &#x3C;/em&#x3E;article that cropped &#x3C;em&#x3E;Vogue &#x3C;/em&#x3E;editor&#x27;s statement on canceled Clinton photo shoot  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200801230005</link>
<description>In a recent blog entry, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E; chief political writer Mike Allen posted a passage from &#x3C;em&#x3E;Women&#x27;s Wear Daily &#x3C;/em&#x3E;that misrepresented a statement by &#x3C;em&#x3E;&#x3C;em&#x3E;Vogue&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x3C;/em&#x3E; editor-in-chief Anna Wintour in her February &#x22;letter from the editor,&#x22; in which she addressed Sen. Hillary Clinton&#x27;s cancellation of a scheduled cover shoot. The &#x3C;em&#x3E;WWD&#x3C;/em&#x3E; cropped Wintour&#x27;s comments in which she critiqued the media, and neither Allen nor &#x3C;em&#x3E;WWD&#x3C;/em&#x3E; indicated through ellipses or otherwise that words had been omitted.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200801230005</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:43:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On CNN, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Allen defends McCain response to &#x22;bitch&#x22; question about Clinton: &#x22;[W]hat Republican voter hasn&#x27;t thought that? What voter in general hasn&#x27;t thought that?&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200711140011</link>
<description>Discussing a campaign event at
which a questioner asked Sen. John McCain, &#x22;How do we beat the
bitch?&#x22; -- presumably referring to Sen.
Hillary Rodham Clinton --&#x3C;em&#x3E; Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;
chief political correspondent Mike Allen said, &#x22;[W]hat Republican voter
hasn&#x27;t thought that? What voter in general hasn&#x27;t thought
that?&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200711140011</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 17:32:16 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>ABC&#x27;s The Note, NBC&#x27;s First Read, Drudge Report, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Mike Allen continue to  highlight &#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x27;s  &#x3C;/em&#x3E;false  assertion on Dem Iraq  bills</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200711130003</link>
<description>Despite the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s correction 
of its claim that Democrats were &#x22;Zero for 40&#x22; on legislation &#x22;limiting 
President Bush&#x27;s war policy&#x22; -- though the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E; did not acknowledge that it had made a mistake 
in the corrected article -- several 
in the 
media, including the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s own Mike Allen, Matt Drudge, 
and ABC&#x27;s The Note, highlighted the false 
statistic without noting that it is inaccurate.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200711130003</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 15:33:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;: &#x22;[B]lessing&#x22; by  Robertson -- who called  for assassination of Hugo Chavez and spoke of Europe&#x27;s &#x22;racial suicide&#x22; -- gives Giuliani  &#x22;momentum&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200711070005</link>
<description>Politico.com called Pat Robertson endorsement of Rudy Giuliani a &#x22;blessing&#x22; and 
said that it gives Giuliani &#x22;momentum.&#x22; Similarly, the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Mike Allen wrote that, with 
Robertson&#x27;s announcement, Giuliani &#x22;has one of the most resonant imprimaturs 
with Christian voters.&#x22; However, in claiming that Robertson&#x27;s endorsement &#x22;gives 
Rudy Giuliani momentum&#x22; -- a questionable claim, given that the endorsement had 
been announced just that morning -- the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E; ignored Robertson&#x27;s history of 
controversial statements.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200711070005</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Nov 2007 14:11:42 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>From  cleavage to &#x22;cackle&#x22;? Media find new focus in coverage of Hillary  Clinton</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200710040003</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200710040003</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Oct 2007 21:29:04 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The media misses  Mitt Romney&#x27;s YouTube moment</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708130007</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708130007</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:43:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s  Allen uncritically quoted McConnell claiming Democratic Congress has &#x22;not been  very productive&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200707250011</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200707250011</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 18:18:02 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Allen gushed over Romney&#x27;s PowerPoint slides, still can&#x27;t find space for Giuliani ISG story</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200706220007</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200706220007</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 16:27:25 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Allen ignored polling data showing Libby pardon to be extremely unpopular</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200706180003</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200706180003</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:00:04 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article on White House-Senate immigration agreement quoted only Republicans</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200705180006</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200705180006</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 14:56:59 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Allen did not challenge McCain&#x27;s claim on Gonzales resignation that &#x22;I just haven&#x27;t been asked&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200704270008</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200704270008</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 15:38:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>ABC&#x27;s Tapper, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Allen -- citing &#x22;juicy&#x22; issue for GOP -- didn&#x27;t mention Pelosi&#x27;s attempted meeting with Petraeus</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200704250002</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200704250002</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:39:46 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>