<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Miles O&#x27;Brien</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/miles_o_brien</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Miles O&#x27;Brien</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>Discussing  Collins&#x27; complaint, CNN&#x27;s O&#x27;Brien cast campaign tracking &#x22;phenomenon&#x22; as  new</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708200005</link>
<description>While discussing objections raised by Sen. Susan Collins&#x27; chief of staff to a 
tracker hired by the Maine Democratic Party, CNN&#x27;s Miles O&#x27;Brien suggested that 
political tracking became widespread only after the 2006 midterm elections. In 
fact, CNN and other news organizations have noted campaigns&#x27; use of trackers 
since at least 1996.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708200005</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 17:06:58 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN report ignored Bush administration&#x27;s alleged responsibility for bin Laden escape from Tora Bora in 2001</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708170007</link>
<description>Reporting on U.S.
troops having returned to Afghanistan&#x27;s
Tora Bora region,
CNN&#x27;s Miles O&#x27;Brien and Barbara Starr noted that Osama bin Laden
had reportedly escaped capture there in late 2001, but not that, according to a
previous CNN report, the administration ignored requests for more troops,
allowing bin Laden to escape.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708170007</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 13:27:46 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s O&#x27;Brien  ignored damage from Bush-endorsed Pakistan-tribal leader  pact</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708100009</link>
<description>In reporting that a &#x22;much-criticized pact&#x22; between Pakistani President Musharraf 
and tribal leaders -- that &#x22;would have pulled Pakistani troops from that tribal 
region bordering Afghanistan where many believe Osama Bin Laden is ... fell 
through&#x22; -- CNN&#x27;s Miles O&#x27;Brien did not mention that the deal, which did take 
effect and which the Bush administration &#x22;reluctantly endorsed,&#x22; facilitated the 
&#x22;regenerat[ion]&#x22; of several elements of Al Qaeda&#x27;s infrastructure, according to 
a recent National Intelligence Estimate.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708100009</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 19:59:43 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Newsweek&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Thomas, CNN&#x27;s O&#x27;Brien and Sesno uncritically cited &#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; editorial, Cheney comments to attack Pelosi</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200704100010</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200704100010</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 12:45:52 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ignoring widespread agreement on core issues, media suggested wins by &#x22;conservative Democrats&#x22; will cause intraparty strife</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200611080009</link>
<description>Media figures have attributed Democratic gains in
the House and Senate in the midterm elections to the number of wins by
conservative or moderate Democratic challengers and have suggested that because
the party&#x27;s victory in the House was purportedly &#x22;built on the back
of more centrist candidates,&#x22; the incoming Democratic majority will be sharply
divided. However, a &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters for
America&#x3C;/em&#x3E; survey of the policy positions of 27 victorious House candidates
found that they all agree on a core set of issues, including raising the
minimum wage and protecting Social Security.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200611080009</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Nov 2006 15:52:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN and Fox let &#x22;straight-shooter&#x22; Tony Snow peddle false, misleading, and baseless GOP talking points</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200611040012</link>
<description>During Tony Snow&#x27;s recent
series of appearances on cable news channels, interviewers on CNN and Fox News left
unchallenged a number of false, misleading, and baseless
Republican talking points on a variety of issues. After allowing Snow to misrepresent the
Democratic position on the surveillance and detention of suspected terrorists, CNN
host Wolf Blitzer told Snow that he is
&#x22;a straight shooter.&#x22;

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200611040012</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 4 Nov 2006 12:24:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Does Miles O&#x27;Brien believe CNN Baghdad correspondent Michael Ware is part of the &#x22;&#x27;grassy knoll&#x27; set&#x22;?</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200611010013</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200611010013</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Nov 2006 17:58:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s Miles O&#x27;Brien mocked those speculating that Saddam verdict&#x27;s timing may be political</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200610310005</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200610310005</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:53:47 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Echoing Fox News, CNN&#x27;s O&#x27;Brien claimed Clinton had &#x22;meltdown&#x22; during interview with Wallace</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200609280004</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200609280004</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:46:32 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN, Fox News, MSNBC, and NBC touted &#x3C;em&#x3E;USA Today&#x3C;/em&#x3E;/Gallup poll with Bush approval rating at 44 percent, ignored earlier Pew poll placing his approval at 37 percent</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200609210003</link>
<description>Many television news outlets touted a &#x3C;em&#x3E;USA Today&#x3C;/em&#x3E;/Gallup poll putting President Bush&#x27;s job approval rating at 44 percent as a success for Bush, asserting that his rating is &#x22;the highest it&#x27;s been in a year.&#x22; But four days earlier, the same news organizations ignored a Pew Research  Center poll showing Bush&#x27;s approval rating at 37 percent.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200609210003</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 21:26:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Will the media acknowledge there was no &#x22;Bush bounce&#x22; after U.K. terror arrests?</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608170011</link>
<description>After the recent arrests of terrorism suspects in the United Kingdom, numerous media outlets asked whether President Bush&#x27;s approval ratings would benefit from the news or even claimed outright that his ratings already had benefited. Subsequent polling has shown the arrests resulted in little or no benefit for Bush. &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E; now asks: Will these media outlets report on the true effect of the arrest on Bush&#x27;s ratings?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608170011</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 18:39:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;GMA&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, CNN, print media fail to challenge Bush&#x27;s missile defense claim</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200607070008</link>
<description>Following President Bush&#x27;s claim on &#x3C;em&#x3E;Larry King Live&#x3C;/em&#x3E; that the United States had a functional missile defense system, numerous media outlets reported his statement without challenge. By contrast, a report on NPR&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;Morning Edition&#x3C;/em&#x3E; noted that the missile defense system &#x22;has been plagued with technical problems&#x22; and has never been thoroughly tested, citing Government Accountability Office reports that indicate the system has no proven ability to shoot down a hostile missile.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200607070008</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 Jul 2006 16:02:43 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s O&#x27;Brien questioned the patriotism of Vietnam vets protesting administration&#x27;s actions in Iraq</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200605100006</link>
<description>Commenting on the two Vietnam veterans who recently mailed their military decorations to President Bush in protest over the administration&#x27;s foreign policy, Miles O&#x27;Brien asked: &#x22;[I]s it the patriotic thing to do?&#x22; He also said, &#x22;If I were a soldier in Iraq ... I would feel somewhat betrayed to hear that veterans were doing this. Is that, in some way, not showing support for the men and women who are risking their lives over there?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200605100006</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 14:14:25 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media touted Bush&#x27;s routine at Correspondents&#x27; dinner, ignored Colbert&#x27;s skewering</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200605010005</link>
<description>Following the White House Correspondents&#x27; dinner, numerous news outlets trumpeted President Bush&#x27;s performance at the event, but entirely ignored the scathing routine delivered by the night&#x27;s featured entertainer, Comedy Central&#x27;s Stephen Colbert. In his act, Colbert mocked the White House&#x27;s current woes, slammed a wide range of Bush administration policies, and lampooned the mainstream media.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200605010005</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 May 2006 15:54:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Five morning shows allowed Matalin to spin away without challenge</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200604210006</link>
<description>On April 20, Republican strategist Mary Matalin appeared alone on five network and cable morning shows with no one to rebut her false claims, pro-GOP spin, and attacks on the Democratic Party.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200604210006</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 14:00:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>