<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Minimum Wage</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/minimum_wage</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Minimum Wage</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>Media allowed to stand suggestion that Pelosi support for minimum wage bill stems from company in her district</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200701230008</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200701230008</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 16:58:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Beck allowed misinformation on minimum wage hike</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200701100009</link>
<description>On his CNN program, Glenn Beck allowed the Cato
Institute&#x27;s James Dorn to repeat a much-circulated myth that the minimum
wage increase proposal would benefit &#x22;typically your part-time ... young workers that
are making minimum wage,&#x22; adding that [m]ost of these workers are in
families that have incomes in the middle income or even higher middle-income
families.&#x22;

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200701100009</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:43:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Lowry: Minimum wage hike will &#x22;give a small boost&#x22; to &#x22;teenagers working summers&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200701090006</link>
<description>In his latest column, Rich Lowry wrote that
&#x22;[t]he effect&#x22; of a Democratic proposal to raise the federal
minimum wage &#x22;basically will be to give a small boost to the wage
of teenagers working summers or after school.&#x22; In fact, the Economic Policy
Institute found that 71 percent of those who would be &#x22;directly
affected&#x22; by the Democratic minimum-wage proposal are age 20 or over.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200701090006</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:39:22 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; headline falsely claimed Bush &#x22;[s]upports Democrats&#x27; &#x22; minimum wage proposal</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200612210004</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200612210004</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 15:19:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Will falsely suggested most employees affected by Dems&#x27; proposed minimum-wage increase are &#x22;students and other part-time workers&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200611210006</link>
<description>George F. Will falsely suggested
that most employees who would benefit from a Democratic proposal to raise the
federal minimum wage to $7.25 an hour are &#x22;students and other part-time
workers.&#x22; In fact, a majority of those who would be affected by the
Democratic minimum-wage proposal are full-time workers.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200611210006</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:21:11 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Barnes baselessly cited opposition to &#x22;hiking the minimum wage&#x22; as evidence of Democratic partisanship</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608150003</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Beltway Boys&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Fred Barnes baselessly asserted that congressional Democrats opposed a bill that would have increased the minimum wage because &#x22;Democrats have decided, &#x27;We&#x27;re not going to help Republicans on anything. ... We&#x27;re going to object to it ... even when they&#x27;re offering us things like hiking the minimum wage that we like.&#x27; &#x22; Barnes did not mention that House Republicans tied the wage increase to a bill that would cut the estate tax, a proposal Democrats vehemently opposed for providing a disproportionate benefit to the wealthiest Americans.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608150003</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 11:49:48 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Boortz read &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E; reader comments aloud while again smearing adult minimum-wage earners</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608050001</link>
<description>On his radio show, before reading comments from a &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters for America&#x3C;/em&#x3E; item that documented his August 3 remarks describing adult minimum-wage earners as &#x22;incompetent,&#x22; &#x22;ignorant,&#x22; &#x22;stupid,&#x22; &#x22;worthless,&#x22; and &#x22;pathetic,&#x22; Neal Boortz again smeared them, calling adult minimum-wage earners &#x22;100 percent pure unadulterated loser[s].&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608050001</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 4 Aug 2006 20:18:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>ABC, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; advanced misleading arguments against minimum-wage boost, obscured Democratic support for wage increase</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608030008</link>
<description>ABC White House correspondent Jake Tapper and &#x3C;em&#x3E;Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; staff writer Jeffrey Birnbaum both uncritically reported conservatives&#x27; argument that a minimum-wage increase will eliminate existing jobs and discourage the creation of new ones. However, several studies show that minimum-wage increases do not hurt employment.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608030008</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 3 Aug 2006 19:30:32 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Boortz: Adults earning minimum wage are &#x22;incompetent&#x22;, &#x22;ignorant&#x22;, &#x22;stupid&#x22;, &#x22;worthless,&#x22; and &#x22;pathetic&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608030007</link>
<description>Neal Boortz asked his audience, &#x22;[H]ow incompetent, how ignorant, how worthless is an adult that can&#x27;t earn more than the minimum wage?&#x22; Boortz also falsely claimed that &#x22;most of the people that earn [the] minimum wage are teenagers.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608030007</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 3 Aug 2006 17:30:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;NY Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; obscured Democratic support for minimum wage increase, uncritically repeated anti-wage increase argument</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200607280006</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;The New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; and &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; credited GOP &#x22;moderates&#x22; with forcing the Republican leadership to allow a vote on increasing the minumum wage, burying the fact that Democrats have been pushing for years to increase the minimum wage. The &#x3C;em&#x3E;Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; and the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; also uncritically repeated the argument, often put forth by opponents of a wage increase, that a higher minimum wage will result in job losses and discourage job creation.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200607280006</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 18:55:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>O&#x27;Beirne claimed Kerry &#x22;very quietly&#x22; endorsed minimum wage hike</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200503140008</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200503140008</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2005 17:53:03 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>NPR, media quoted &#x22;think tank&#x22; without noting industry, GOP ties</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200503050001</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200503050001</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 4 Mar 2005 19:14:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Limbaugh wrong on minimum wage -- again</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200408130005</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200408130005</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2004 17:05:16 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Former Labor secretary nominee Linda Chavez did not know the minimum wage</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200406220009</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200406220009</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2004 18:34:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Limbaugh wrong on the minimum wage</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200405020007</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200405020007</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2004 18:04:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>