<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Newt Gingrich</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/newt_gingrich</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Newt Gingrich</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>Fox&#x27;s Hannity again falsely suggested that Obama referred to &#x22;invading Pakistan&#x22;; Gingrich doesn&#x27;t acknowledge he&#x27;s advocated similar position  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200807210004</link>
<description> In a discussion with Newt Gingrich on Fox News, Sean Hannity mischaracterized Sen. Barack Obama&#x27;s comments about taking unilateral action against terrorism targets in Pakistan, if necessary, suggesting that Obama advocated &#x22;invading Pakistan.&#x22; Rather, in an August 2007 speech, Obama said: &#x22;If we have actionable intelligence about high-value terrorist targets [in Pakistan] and President [Pervez] Musharraf won&#x27;t act, we will.&#x22; Further, just two days earlier on Fox News&#x27; &#x3C;em&#x3E;The O&#x27;Reilly Factor&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Gingrich himself spoke in favor of taking action against terrorists in Pakistan.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200807210004</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:51:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Gingrich, Hume criticize Obama for invoking his grandmother in the context of Wright  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200803180006</link>
<description>Responding to Barack Obama&#x27;s noting, in addressing controversial statements made by Rev. Jeremiah Wright, that his white grandmother had &#x22;uttered racial or ethnic stereotypes,&#x22; Newt Gingrich said on Fox News: To reduce a 20-year relationship with a public figure to his grandmother is just wrong. It&#x27;s emotionally powerful, but it&#x27;s just wrong.&#x22; Separately, Fox News&#x27; Brit Hume said of Obama&#x27;s statement: &#x22;[S]ome may find it deceptive, but ... it was pretty clever.&#x22;     </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200803180006</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 18:17:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Olbermann gave Coulter &#x22;gold&#x22; in &#x22;Worst Person&#x22; segment for &#x22;faggot&#x22; comment; Limbaugh came in second</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200703060014</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200703060014</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 6 Mar 2007 17:07:09 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Gingrich, Barnes falsely suggested media have ignored Reid land deal</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200610240016</link>
<description>Newt Gingrich and Fred Barnes
both falsely suggested that the media have ignored allegations that Senate Democratic
Leader Harry Reid improperly reported a land deal and have focused exclusively
on Republican scandals. In fact, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Time&#x3C;/em&#x3E;,
CNN and Fox News have devoted significantly more coverage to the Reid deal than
to a
controversial land deal that benefited Republican House Speaker Dennis Hastert.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200610240016</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 16:31:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Gingrich repeated falsehood that Rangel promised to raise taxes if Dems take control of House</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200610110004</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200610110004</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 12:48:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>In Foley scandal, conservatives find plenty of excuses and plenty of people to blame (other than the GOP)</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200610040010</link>
<description>Seeking to minimize the extent to which the House Republican leadership can be blamed for the scandal surrounding former Rep. Mark Foley, several congressional Republicans, media figures, and conservatives have posited various conspiracy theories and placed blame on just about everyone and everything else -- including liberals, Democrats, the media, &#x22;politically correct culture,&#x22; gays in Congress, and congressional pages.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200610040010</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 4 Oct 2006 15:47:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Gingrich: House GOP would have &#x22;been accused of gay bashing&#x22; if it &#x22;overly aggressively reacted&#x22; to Foley&#x27;s emails in 2005</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200610010003</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200610010003</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 1 Oct 2006 14:33:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Olbermann named Gingrich &#x22;Worst Person&#x22; for declaring that &#x22;appeasers&#x22; label is &#x22;not an insult&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200609060004</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200609060004</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Sep 2006 12:27:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Gingrich: &#x22;It&#x27;s not an insult[ ]&#x22; to compare Bush administration critics &#x22;to those who enabled Hitler&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200609050002</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Hannity &#x26;amp; Colmes&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Newt Gingrich stated that Donald Rumsfeld&#x27;s likening of Iraq war critics to Nazi appeasers was &#x22;not an insulting comment.&#x22; Gingrich also repeated the misleading claim that the United States &#x22;found over 700 chemical warheads and weapons in Iraq, which supposedly had none, according to our friends on the left.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200609050002</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 Sep 2006 13:29:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On Fox, Gingrich advanced false claim that Dingell said &#x22;there&#x27;s no moral difference&#x22; between Hezbollah and Israel</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608070003</link>
<description>On the heels of several conservative media outlets cropping a quote from Rep. John Dingell to suggest that he had refused to condemn Hezbollah&#x27;s actions in the ongoing conflict with Israel, Newt Gingrich announced on &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox News Sunday&#x3C;/em&#x3E; that Dingell had said &#x22;there&#x27;s no moral difference&#x22; between Hezbollah and Israel.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608070003</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Aug 2006 14:53:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Conservative pundits made wildly wrong claims about how Iraq would turn out -- what are they saying now about the Middle East?</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200607270007</link>
<description>Numerous conservative pundits offered highly optimistic predictions about the U.S. invasion of Iraq regarding the conflict&#x27;s duration, difficulty, and human and financial costs -- nearly all of which have proven to be wrong. But rather than hold these &#x22;Pollyanna pundits&#x22; accountable for their past misjudgments, the media have again provided a platform for their views about the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hezbollah. And echoing their rhetoric on Iraq, these conservative pundits have advocated further military action by the United States and its allies.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200607270007</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 18:36:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Meet the Press&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Gingrich cited nonoperational terror plots as evidence of &#x22;World War III&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200607170008</link>
<description>On NBC&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;Meet the Press&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Newt Gingrich declared that &#x22;we are in the early stages of what I would describe as the Third World War.&#x22; As evidence of &#x22;World War III,&#x22; Gingrich cited -- among other events -- two purported terror plots that involved alleged conspirators who intended to attack U.S. targets but had no apparent means to do so.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200607170008</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 19:21:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Despite blasting &#x3C;em&#x3E;NY Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; for bank monitoring story, conservative media figures mum on unwanted media exposure of alleged NYC terror plot</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200607110001</link>
<description>Many of the same media conservatives who continually attacked &#x3C;em&#x3E;The New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; for publishing details of the Treasury Department&#x27;s bank-tracking program have remained silent about the &#x3C;em&#x3E;New York Daily News&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27; decision to report that FBI officials thwarted an alleged terrorist plot in New York City, despite apparent objections from intelligence and law enforcement officials that the disclosure impeded further arrests.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200607110001</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 10:32:10 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>UPDATE: O&#x27;Reilly apologizes for Murtha misquote</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200606290008</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200606290008</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 11:53:15 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Top falsehoods about &#x3C;em&#x3E;NY Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; and Bush bank-tracking program</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200606290003</link>
<description>In response to the reports describing a Treasury Department program designed to monitor international financial transactions for terrorist activity, President Bush and other White House officials lashed out at the media -- and &#x3C;em&#x3E;The New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; in particular -- for purportedly undermining the government&#x27;s antiterrorism efforts. But as with the disclosure of the Bush administration&#x27;s warrantless domestic surveillance and domestic call-tracking programs, the administration and its supporters in the media have relied on numerous false and misleading claims to support their arguments.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200606290003</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 13:53:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>