<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Nightline</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/nightline</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Nightline</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>ABC&#x27;s Moran asserted some Obama &#x22;friends&#x22; said his house purchase &#x22;looks like a sweetheart deal,&#x22; but quoted no one saying that  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802280007</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Nightline&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Terry Moran reported, &#x22;The Obamas got the home [their house in Chicago] for $300,000 below the original asking price. To critics and even some friends, it looks like a sweetheart deal.&#x22; Moran later added that Obama&#x27;s campaign &#x22;insists that the Obamas&#x27; purchase and the Rezko purchase were not contingent on each other and were made at fair-market prices.&#x22; But Moran cited no one saying the home purchase &#x22;looks like a sweetheart deal&#x22; and did not note that, according to Bloomberg News, &#x22;[t]he couple who sold Barack Obama his Chicago home said the Illinois senator&#x27;s $1.65 million bid &#x27;was the best offer&#x27; and they didn&#x27;t cut their asking price because a campaign donor bought their adjacent land, according to e-mails between Obama&#x27;s presidential campaign and the seller.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802280007</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:57:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>MoveOn.org  and the media mess</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200709180005</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200709180005</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 12:31:46 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The  Iraq news blackout: how the press spent its  summer vacation</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200709050002</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200709050002</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 5 Sep 2007 09:34:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Nightline&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, &#x3C;em&#x3E;GMA&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Today&#x3C;/em&#x3E; report Thompson&#x27;s reaction to commutation, but not his ties to Libby defense fund</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200707030009</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200707030009</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:59:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The media&#x27;s assault on reason</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200706120005</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200706120005</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:19:35 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>ABC&#x27;s Moran falsely asserted McCain takes &#x22;all questions,&#x22; ignored flip-flops</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200703270009</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200703270009</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 17:26:49 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>ABC&#x27;s Tapper claimed &#x22;inherent contradiction&#x22; in Clinton&#x27;s Iraq statements but left out context refuting his claim</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200702130010</link>
<description>Jake Tapper baselessly claimed that an
&#x22;inherent contradiction&#x22; exists between Sen. Hillary Rodham
Clinton&#x27;s statements prior to her 2002 vote to authorize the use of force against Iraq
and her recent
explanation of that vote.
Tapper&#x27;s report suggested that Clinton had
not advocated further U.N. inspections in Iraq before an invasion, but she
did so in the same 2002 interview from which Tapper quoted.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200702130010</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 17:04:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Pelosi smear: Stupid -- but kind of entertaining</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200702130007</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200702130007</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:08:25 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Nightline&#x3C;/em&#x3E; aired GOP claim that Pelosi requested &#x22;a luxury jet&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200702090017</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200702090017</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 Feb 2007 18:04:48 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Tapper&#x27;s profile of &#x22;Barack Hussein Obama&#x22; asked: &#x22;Just who the hell is Barack Obama?&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200701180002</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200701180002</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 19:49:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>ABC&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;Nightline&#x3C;/em&#x3E; reported that &#x22;both sides&#x22; are airing &#x22;mudslinging&#x22; campaign ads, yet &#x3C;em&#x3E;Nightline&#x3C;/em&#x3E; could not point to a single Democratic example</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200610260004</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200610260004</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 10:44:10 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Press downplays Iraq during campaign season. Again.</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200609260008</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200609260008</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:57:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Nightline&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, ABC&#x27;s Ross reported simply that bin Laden &#x22;was able to slip away&#x22; from Tora Bora</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200609110002</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200609110002</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 10:55:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Moran called Powell&#x27;s WMD claims &#x22;a total intelligence failure at the CIA&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200605220003</link>
<description>On ABC&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;Nightline&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, co-anchor Terry Moran characterized &#x22;the U.S. claim that Saddam Hussein&#x27;s regime had weapons of mass destruction&#x22; as &#x22;a total intelligence failure at the CIA.&#x22; In fact, while much of the intelligence produced by the CIA before the Iraq war was indeed faulty, many of the Bush administration&#x27;s most dramatic prewar claims had been called into question by the CIA or other intelligence agencies.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200605220003</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 13:13:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>ABC&#x27;s Donvan misrepresented scope of Harris controversy, ignored her request for MZM appropriation</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200603230014</link>
<description>On ABC&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;Nightline&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, correspondent John Donvan misrepresented the scope of the controversy about ties between Rep. Katherine Harris (R-FL) and disgraced defense contractor Mitchell Wade. Donvan reported that Wade &#x22;made illegal contributions to her campaign&#x22; but added: &#x22;[T]hough she gave the money back, it&#x27;s what reporters in Florida keep asking about. Even this week it came up.&#x22; In fact, in the past week, while Florida newspapers have continued to raise questions about the illegal campaign contributions, they have also focused on Harris&#x27;s subsequent request to the House Defense Appropriations Subcommittee for a $10 million earmark that would have benefited Wade&#x27;s company.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200603230014</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 16:30:16 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>