<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Other Judicial Nominations</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/other_judicial_nominations</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Other Judicial Nominations</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Weisman falsely claimed Senate Judiciary Committee &#x22;has shown no interest in&#x22; judicial nominations</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200704300002</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200704300002</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 12:01:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Washington papers misled on Kavanaugh nomination</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200605100004</link>
<description>In reporting and editorializing on the Senate Judiciary Committee&#x27;s May 9 hearings to consider President Bush&#x27;s nomination of White House staff secretary Brett Kavanaugh for a seat on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; and &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; each offered incomplete, inaccurate, and misleading portrayals of Kavanaugh&#x27;s nomination and of Kavanaugh himself.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200605100004</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 12:31:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fox&#x27;s O&#x27;Brien falsely defended Luttig as &#x22;taking issue with the administration&#x22; on enemy combatants</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200507060006</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200507060006</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Jul 2005 17:02:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Pickering, Hannity used falsehoods to attack Democratic opposition to Pickering&#x27;s judicial nomination</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200505240003</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200505240003</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2005 16:42:10 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Turley, Fox&#x27;s Angle omitted key facts on controversial record of Bush judicial nominee Brown</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200505230004</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200505230004</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2005 18:37:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Limbaugh: Opposition to judicial nominee Brown is evidence Democrats are &#x22;becoming racist and bigoted&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200505190004</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200505190004</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2005 14:36:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Novak repeated conservative canard that Democrats &#x22;are opposing Judge Pryor of Alabama because of his religion&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200504280008</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200504280008</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 18:06:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Colson, Limbaugh mischaracterized Democratic opposition to Pryor, Brown nominations</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200504260007</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200504260007</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2005 18:20:03 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>