<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Paula Zahn Now</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/paula_zahn_now</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Paula Zahn Now</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>How low (in the  ratings) can Glenn Beck go?</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200707310005</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200707310005</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:10:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Tomasky review further rebuts Gerth/Van Natta report of long-time plan for Hillary Clinton presidency</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200707050006</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200707050006</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Jul 2007 16:43:09 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Despite pattern of inflammatory comments, Beck to guest host for CNN&#x27;s Zahn</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200706260009</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200706260009</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 17:05:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Van Natta falsehood exposed: Anonymous sources far outnumber named sources in &#x3C;em&#x3E;Her Way&#x3C;/em&#x3E;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200706160003</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Her
Way&#x3C;/em&#x3E; co-author Don Van Natta Jr. claimed that, in writing the book,
he and Jeff Gerth &#x22;were able to interview 500 people, many of them on the
record -- most of them on the record.&#x22; In fact, a &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E; review counted 101 distinct named interviewees in the book&#x27;s endnotes. Of the 873 citations to interviews, 309 were to interviews of named sources, while 564 were to interviews of anonymous sources.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200706160003</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 23:55:32 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;Paula Zahn Now&#x3C;/em&#x3E; investigates: &#x22;Is Sen. Barack Obama&#x27;s church racist?&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200704030003</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200704030003</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 3 Apr 2007 13:40:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media suggested conservative Christians are particularly outraged by Foley scandal</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200610090008</link>
<description>In their coverage of the Foley scandal&#x27;s political effects, numerous media figures have suggested that conservative Christians are most likely to react negatively to the Foley scandal. In doing so, they presume that so-called &#x22;values voters&#x22; are more concerned than others with protecting children.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200610090008</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Oct 2006 18:37:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Focusing on FBI-CREW dispute, CNN ignored FBI&#x27;s inconsistencies in the Foley scandal</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200610070001</link>
<description>In several reports on the dispute between the FBI and Citizens for Ethics and Responsibility in Washington over the agency&#x27;s handling of the emails that led to the Foley scandal, CNN has failed to explore inconsistencies in the FBI&#x27;s claims about its investigation of the emails or lack thereof.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200610070001</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Oct 2006 20:00:48 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Bloomberg, Reuters joined CNN in uncritically reporting Bush&#x27;s new position that he &#x22;[a]bsolutely&#x22; would send troops into Pakistan to get bin Laden</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200609220001</link>
<description>In recent reports on President Bush&#x27;s September 20 statement that he &#x22;[a]bsolutely&#x22; would order U.S. troops into Pakistan to capture Osama bin Laden, Bloomberg News and Reuters joined CNN in ignoring Bush&#x27;s contradictory statement that the United States could send troops into Pakistan to hunt for bin Laden unless it was &#x22;invited&#x22; to do so, because Pakistan is a &#x22;sovereign nation.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200609220001</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 20:11:10 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>After hyping Boehner&#x27;s attack on Dems, will media highlight Landrieu&#x27;s indictment of GOP terror policies?</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200609150001</link>
<description>House Majority Leader John Boehner received widespread media coverage for his remark about Democratic colleagues: &#x22;Sometimes, based on the votes that get cast, you wonder whether they&#x27;re more interested in the rights of the terrorists than in protecting the American people.&#x22; Sen. Mary Landrieu responded to similar criticism in the Senate with an indictment of the Republicans&#x27; counterterrorism policies. Will the media highlight Landrieu&#x27;s comments as they did Boehner&#x27;s?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200609150001</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 20:00:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN, Fox, ABC hosts ignored key issues in interviews of Kean: his relationship with &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Path to 9/11&#x3C;/em&#x3E; producers, possible benefit to his son&#x27;s Senate campaign</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200609090006</link>
<description>Hosts on CNN, ABC, and Fox News failed to raise key issues while interviewing Thomas H. Kean about his role as a senior consultant to the ABC&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Path to 9/11&#x3C;/em&#x3E; -- specifically, the terms of his arrangement with ABC and the possible benefit of Kean&#x27;s high-profile promotion of the conservative-skewed miniseries to the campaign of his namesake son, who is running as a Republican for a Senate seat in New Jersey.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200609090006</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 8 Sep 2006 22:04:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media embraced ABC&#x27;s contradictory defense that critics are &#x22;premature and irresponsible&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200609080012</link>
<description>Various news media have uncritically reported ABC&#x27;s statement that criticism of &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Path to 9/11&#x3C;/em&#x3E; is &#x22;premature and irresponsible,&#x22; because the film has not yet been finalized, even though the network reportedly said the previous week that the film was &#x22;locked and ready to air,&#x22; screened the film at the National Press Club, and has provided preview copies to conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh and a number of right-wing bloggers.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200609080012</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 8 Sep 2006 18:49:15 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>ABC&#x27;s 9-11 miniseries under intense fire from journalists, conservatives</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200609080007</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200609080007</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 8 Sep 2006 14:20:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Medved on CNN: &#x22;Michael Moore has done far more damage to the Jewish community ... than anything Mel Gibson has ever done&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608050002</link>
<description>While defending Mel Gibson on CNN&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;Paula Zahn Now&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, conservative radio host Michael Medved declared that &#x22;Michael Moore has done far more damage to the Jewish community, particularly regarding the issue of Israel, than anything Mel Gibson has ever done.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608050002</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 4 Aug 2006 20:32:35 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN still fixated on Apocalypse predictors, still ignoring alleged invitation to White House, Capitol Hill</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608010007</link>
<description>On July 31, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Paula Zahn Now&#x3C;/em&#x3E; featured a segment on &#x22;whether the crisis in the Middle East is actually a prelude to the end of the world,&#x22; marking the third time in nine days that CNN has devoted airtime to those claiming that the ongoing Mideast violence signals the coming of the Apocalypse.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608010007</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 1 Aug 2006 19:52:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>In Middle East conflict, other crises, conservative media find signs of Biblical prophecy of Armageddon</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200607260002</link>
<description>In recent days, some members of the conservative media have seen signs of the Apocalypse in the escalated conflicts in the Middle East and Asia. Pat Robertson has considered the possibility but has seemed to reject it, while columnist Hal Lindsey has simply asserted: &#x22;Now Armageddon looms large before us.&#x22; But as recent reports on CNN and in &#x3C;em&#x3E;USA Today&#x3C;/em&#x3E; attest, conservatives are not the only media figures to raise the question of whether current events are a sign of the &#x22;End Times.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200607260002</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 20:58:47 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>