<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Premiere Radio Networks</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/premiere_radio_networks</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Premiere Radio Networks</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>Limbaugh: Democrats will not say &#x22;We honor your service&#x22; to troops returning from Iraq    </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200807030005</link>
<description> Rush Limbaugh asserted that troops returning from Iraq &#x22;will not receive anything from the Democrat [sic] Party along the likes of &#x27;Job well done. We&#x27;re proud of you.&#x27; And this is highly distressing. Not only will Democrats not say, nor leftists, say to any returning troops from Iraq, &#x27;Good job. Job well done. We honor your service.&#x27; No, they did just the opposite. They sought to secure defeat of the U.S. military in Iraq.&#x22; In fact, many Senate Democrats recently honored the service of U.S. troops serving in Iraq and Afghanistan.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200807030005</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 3 Jul 2008 15:34:03 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Limbaugh falsely suggested Hamas supports Obama  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806240009</link>
<description>Rush Limbaugh asserted, &#x22;Hamas has endorsed Obama. ... Why do you think they&#x27;ve endorsed Obama? Because they want a very strong ally for Israel in the White House?&#x22; In fact, Obama stated his support for Israel in a speech June 4 speech in which he said: &#x22;Those who threaten Israel threaten us. ... And I will bring to the White House an unshakeable commitment to Israel&#x27;s security.&#x22; Hamas reportedly responded to Obama&#x27;s remarks by saying, &#x22;Hamas does not differentiate between the two presidential candidates, Obama and McCain, because their policies regarding the Arab-Israel conflict are the same and are hostile to us, therefore we do have no preference and are not wishing for either of them to win.&#x22;       </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200806240009</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 20:44:16 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Limbaugh: &#x22;Democrats will bend over, grab the ankles, and say, &#x27;Have your way with me&#x27; &#x22; to African-Americans and gays  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806240008</link>
<description>After being asked by a caller: &#x22;I want to know how the Republicans don&#x27;t need Christians and conservatives, and they think we&#x27;re 30 percent. Twelve percent black people in the population. Ten percent -- they claim -- homosexuals in the population. Rush, honey, when did 30 percent get to be a small number?&#x22; Rush Limbaugh responded, &#x22;Let me see if I can get your question right. You want to know why the Republicans are willing to say, &#x27;Screw you,&#x27; to 30 percent or more of their voters and yet Democrats will bend over, grab the ankles, and say, &#x27;Have your way with me,&#x27; for 10 percent and 2 percent of the population?&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200806240008</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 19:37:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Limbaugh on Obama: His &#x22;only chance of winning is that he&#x27;s black&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806020006</link>
<description>On his radio program, while discussing Sen. Barack Obama&#x27;s presidential candidacy, Rush Limbaugh asserted that the Democratic Party was &#x22;go[ing] with a veritable rookie whose only chance of winning is that he&#x27;s black.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200806020006</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 Jun 2008 20:06:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Beck apologized for airing portion of Bill Clinton speech &#x22;out of context&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200805230007</link>
<description>Glenn Beck apologized for playing a cropped portion of a speech former President Bill Clinton made in January and &#x22;taking it out of context.&#x22; After replaying the portion of the speech in which Clinton said, &#x22;We just have to slow down our economy&#x22; in order to combat global warming, Beck stated: &#x22;That&#x27;s what we played yesterday. However, if you look at the text of the entire speech, that is taken out of context. What it is, and actually it&#x27;s horrible, and I apologize for it ever getting on the air in this context.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200805230007</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 17:30:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Beck revived falsehood that Bill Clinton said, &#x22;We&#x27;ve got to slow down our economy&#x22; to fight global warming  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200805210011</link>
<description>On his nationally syndicated radio show, Glenn Beck falsely claimed that former President Bill Clinton said, &#x22;We&#x27;ve got to slow down our economy&#x22; in order to combat global warming, and aired a portion of a speech Clinton made in January. However, as Clinton&#x27;s full remarks make clear, he did not suggest &#x22;slow[ing] down our economy&#x22; to fight global warming.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200805210011</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 18:01:32 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Limbaugh: &#x22;If Barack Obama were Caucasian, they would have taken this guy out on the basis of pure ignorance long ago&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200805150008</link>
<description>On his radio show, while discussing recent statements Sen. Barack Obama made about Afghanistan, Rush Limbaugh asserted: &#x22;If Barack Obama were Caucasian, they would have taken this guy out on the basis of pure ignorance long ago.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200805150008</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 17:44:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Limbaugh asserted that &#x22;gas prices didn&#x27;t start going through the roof till [Democrats] took over the House in 2006&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200805130006</link>
<description>Referring to criticism of President Bush by Dick Gephardt over rising gas prices, Rush Limbaugh asserted: &#x22;[G]as prices didn&#x27;t start going through the roof till [Democrats] took over the House in 2006.&#x22; In fact, average monthly gasoline prices (adjusted for inflation) began to climb several years before Democrats took control of Congress.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200805130006</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 17:08:25 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Limbaugh asserted that &#x22;the Islamofascists are actually campaigning for the election of Democrats&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200804150011</link>
<description>Rush Limbaugh claimed that &#x22;the Islamofascists are actually campaigning for the election of Democrats&#x22; and that &#x22;Islamofascists from [Iranian President Mahmoud] Ahmadinejad to [Ayman] al-Zawahiri ... Osama bin Laden, whoever, are constantly issuing Democrat talking points.&#x22; Limbaugh previously asserted that Ahmadinejad&#x27;s May 2006 letter to President Bush contained &#x22;Democratic talking points.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200804150011</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 20:25:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Limbaugh repeats assertion by Watergate committee counsel Zeifman that he &#x22;fired&#x22; Clinton -- an assertion reportedly contradicted by Zeifman himself  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200804040011</link>
<description>Rush Limbaugh asserted that Jerry Zeifman, former counsel to the House Judiciary Committee, was &#x22;the guy who fired&#x22; Sen. Hillary Clinton when she worked as an attorney on the committee, apparently basing his claim on an article that cites Zeifman. But Zeifman&#x27;s reported claim is undermined by his own previous reported acknowledgement that he did not fire Clinton and did not have the power to do so.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200804040011</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 4 Apr 2008 20:41:02 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Limbaugh&#x27;s purported translation of Obama statement on Clinton: &#x22;I don&#x27;t know why the B-I-itch is staying in&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200803310010</link>
<description>On his radio program, after airing comments by Sen. Barack Obama, in which he stated, &#x22;Senator Clinton can run as long as she wants,&#x22; Rush Limbaugh said: &#x22;Can I translate that for you? &#x27;I don&#x27;t know why the B-I-itch is staying in. I feel like a damn hostage here. But I can&#x27;t say it because she&#x27;s a woman. And if I say that, they&#x27;re going to jump down in my throat for being a sexist.&#x27;&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200803310010</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 18:21:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Limbaugh on Richardson&#x27;s endorsement: &#x22;The lesson for you superdelegates is that you can vote against Hillary Clinton, and for at least four days, you can survive&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200803240010</link>
<description>On his nationally syndicated radio show, Rush Limbaugh suggested that Sen. Hillary Clinton and former President Bill Clinton would react violently to New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson&#x27;s endorsement of Sen. Barack Obama, stating: &#x22;Governor Richardson is alive and well. ... The lesson for you superdelegates is that you can vote against Hillary Clinton, and for at least four days, you can survive.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200803240010</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 20:23:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Limbaugh: &#x22;Obama has disowned his white half ... he&#x27;s decided he&#x27;s got to go all in on the black side&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200803210012</link>
<description>On his radio show, Rush Limbaugh said of Sen. Barack Obama&#x27;s handling of the controversy surrounding remarks by Rev. Jeremiah Wright: &#x22;It is clear that Senator Obama has disowned his white half, that he&#x27;s decided he&#x27;s got to go all in on the black side.&#x22;     </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200803210012</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 20:10:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Limbaugh falsely claimed minister who attacked Obama is &#x22;pro-Hillary&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200803200001</link>
<description>Rush Limbaugh repeatedly claimed that Rev. James David Manning of the ATLAH World Missionary Church in Harlem -- who said that Sen. Barack Obama &#x22;was born trash,&#x22; &#x22;pimps white women and black women,&#x22; and is an &#x22;emissary of the devil&#x22; -- is &#x22;pro-Hillary&#x22; and &#x22;pro-Clinton.&#x22; In fact, Manning stated in a January 25 letter: &#x22;I am not now, nor do I ever plan to be a supporter of the Clintons.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200803200001</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:46:06 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Limbaugh sketch repeated false claim that Rep. Frank &#x22;let a prostitution ring be run out of&#x22; his &#x22;home&#x22;    </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200803120007</link>
<description>On his radio show, Rush Limbaugh aired a parody clip in which an impersonator of former President Bill Clinton repeated the false claim that Rep. Barney Frank &#x22;let a prostitution ring be run out of [his] home.&#x22; In fact, the House ethics committee in 1990 determined that Frank &#x22;did not have either prior or concomitant knowledge of prostitution activities involving third parties alleged to have taken place in his apartment.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200803120007</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:50:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>