<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Race/Affirmative Action</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/race_affirmative_action</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Race/Affirmative Action</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>WABC* says Imus&#x27; explanation of controversial comments &#x22;makes sense&#x22; -- then why did Warner Wolf give a different one?</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806250002</link>
<description>On his radio show, host Don Imus explained controversial comments he&#x27;d made the previous day about Adam &#x22;Pacman&#x22; Jones, who, it was noted, is African American, by asserting, &#x22;My point was that there&#x27;s no reason to arrest this kid six times. He&#x27;s a football player. He&#x27;s a lovely kid. He&#x27;s out having fun. He doesn&#x27;t need to be arrested six -- he gets arrested times. Well, we know why he gets arrested six times.&#x22; But, sportscaster Warner Wolf, who was part of both conversations, offered a different explanation: &#x22;[A]nybody that listens to the show knows that whether it&#x27;s a politician or an athlete or anyone, someone who&#x27;s obviously guilty, you joke and say, &#x27;Well, it must have been racism.&#x27; I mean, it&#x27;s a joke. I mean, we all know that &#x27;Pacman&#x27; is no model citizen. The guy&#x27;s been arrested and suspended. So it&#x27;s a joke.&#x22; Notwithstanding the apparent conflict in their explanations, WABC&#x27;s* Phil Boyce reportedly said of Imus&#x27; explanation: &#x22;When I first heard the comment I thought that&#x27;s probably what he meant, but I called him and he explained and it made sense to me. I said, &#x27;Let&#x27;s make sure you explain it the next time you&#x27;re on the air,&#x27; and he did a very good job.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200806250002</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:59:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ignoring McCain&#x27;s inaction, AP claimed NC GOP &#x22;ignored McCain&#x27;s repeated calls to kill&#x22; controversial ad  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806230007</link>
<description>The AP reported that Sen. John McCain&#x27;s campaign &#x22;promises to condemn any race-based political appeals&#x22; and, referring to a controversial television ad by the North Carolina state Republican Party attacking Sen. Barack Obama, asserted that McCain made &#x22;repeated calls to kill the ad.&#x22; But according to the party&#x27;s chairwoman, at no point did McCain call her directly and ask that she not run the ad, and McCain reportedly said that &#x22;he wouldn&#x27;t have run the GOP ad, &#x27;but I am not going to referee, I am just going to run my own campaign.&#x27; &#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200806230007</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 18:50:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>MSNBC&#x27;s Buchanan called Obama &#x22;exotic,&#x22; said &#x22;[h]e&#x27;s like the guys in the Harvard faculty lounge&#x22; who &#x22;don&#x27;t know anything about their country&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806160007</link>
<description> MSNBC political analyst Pat Buchanan said of the Republican strategy against Sen. Barack Obama: &#x22;[T]hey&#x27;re going to use his associations. And they&#x27;re going to use his statements, his elitism. They&#x27;re going to use the fact he&#x27;s exotic.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200806160007</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:35:32 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Guest host on &#x3C;em&#x3E;Beck&#x3C;/em&#x3E; suggests if Obama elected, political correctness will kill comedy: &#x22;[E]veryone will be so scared of saying anything&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200805300001</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Glenn Beck&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, guest host Michael Graham discussed political correctness in comedy with comedian Nick DiPaolo. Asking DiPaolo if his &#x22;comedian friends&#x22; thought that &#x22;if we have a President Obama, comedy will be dead,&#x22; Graham said, &#x22;[E]veryone will be so scared of saying anything,&#x22; and added: &#x22;You&#x27;ll be scared to order blackened red fish, because you&#x27;re afraid that an African-American or Native American will beat the crap out of you for it.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200805300001</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 12:51:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Limbaugh: &#x22;If Barack Obama were Caucasian, they would have taken this guy out on the basis of pure ignorance long ago&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200805150008</link>
<description>On his radio show, while discussing recent statements Sen. Barack Obama made about Afghanistan, Rush Limbaugh asserted: &#x22;If Barack Obama were Caucasian, they would have taken this guy out on the basis of pure ignorance long ago.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200805150008</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 17:44:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Matthews: Jewish voters &#x22;have one key concern,&#x22; Israel; &#x22;[I]f you&#x27;re African-American ... [y]ou care about certain programs of the federal government&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200804160011</link>
<description>Discussing &#x22;the Catholic vote&#x22; on &#x3C;em&#x3E;Hardball&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Chris Matthews said: &#x22;It isn&#x27;t like a vote like, for example, if you&#x27;re a Jewish voter probably you care about Israel, that&#x27;s a safe bet. You have one key concern. ... But clearly, if you&#x27;re African-American, you care about civil rights. You care about certain programs of the federal government. That&#x27;s a generalization, but probably true.&#x22;    </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200804160011</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 19:13:52 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Saying he was cited by &#x22;Media Morons,&#x22; Boortz again smears Mexicans: &#x22;[A]ny Mexican worth his salt would be able to&#x22; operate a floor buffer &#x22;without getting hurt&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200804110012</link>
<description>Talking with the Media Research Center&#x27;s Brent Bozell, Neal Boortz said: &#x22;I&#x27;m on &#x27;Media Morons&#x27; today ... because I said yesterday on the air that I would make a lousy Mexican because I was trying to use one of those floor buffers and it tossed me around ... when any Mexican worth his salt would be able to do that without getting hurt.&#x22;        </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200804110012</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 19:28:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>O&#x27;Reilly to &#x22;race hustlers&#x22; and &#x22;race-baiters&#x22;: &#x22;[T]he gloves are off&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200804080006</link>
<description>Asserting that &#x22;millions of Americans of all colors are fed up with race-baiters and accusations of racism,&#x22; Bill O&#x27;Reilly identified those he deemed to be &#x22;race hustlers&#x22; and &#x22;race-baiters&#x22; -- among them &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters for America&#x3C;/em&#x3E; -- and declared: &#x22;You better watch it. We got your number. And the gloves are off.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200804080006</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 8 Apr 2008 18:10:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Buchanan on Obama&#x27;s race speech: &#x22;We hear the grievances. Where is the gratitude?&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200803220001</link>
<description>Discussing Sen. Barack Obama&#x27;s speech addressing race and controversial comments by his former pastor, Jeremiah Wright, Pat Buchanan wrote in his syndicated column: &#x22;Wright ought to go down on his knees and thank God he is an American.&#x22; Buchanan then asserted that &#x22;no people anywhere has done more to lift up blacks than white Americans,&#x22; adding: &#x22;We hear the grievances. Where is the gratitude?&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200803220001</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 13:42:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>O&#x27;Reilly on &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E;: &#x22;Any of the presidential candidates who can deport those swine -- I&#x27;m voting for them&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200803200008</link>
<description>On his radio program, Bill O&#x27;Reilly called the &#x22;people&#x22; at &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters for America&#x3C;/em&#x3E; &#x22;the worst Americans in the country&#x22; and stated, &#x22;If I could, I would deport them.&#x22; O&#x27;Reilly also asserted: &#x22;But this &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, this disgusting, despicable, far-left website, they do it all the time. And MoveOn and all these people, that&#x27;s what they do. They disagree with you, and they brand you a racist.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200803200008</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:17:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>O&#x27;Reilly attacked as &#x22;far-left loon&#x22; caller who asked if he would apologize for &#x22;lynching party&#x22; comment  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802210008</link>
<description>Discussing his previous comments about Michelle Obama, Bill O&#x27;Reilly stated that &#x22;[t]he word &#x27;lynching&#x27; was used because I said it quite clearly. I&#x27;m not going to go on some lynching party against Michelle Obama; that&#x27;s ridiculous.&#x22; However, O&#x27;Reilly had said: &#x22;I don&#x27;t want to go on a lynching party against Michelle Obama unless there&#x27;s evidence, hard facts, that say this is how the woman really feels. If that&#x27;s how she really feels -- that America is a bad country or a flawed nation, whatever -- then that&#x27;s legit. We&#x27;ll track it down.&#x22; O&#x27;Reilly also attacked a caller who asked him if he owed &#x22;Michelle Obama an apology for that disrespectful lynching analogy,&#x22; calling him a &#x22;far-left loon.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802210008</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 19:05:06 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Tucker Carlson echoed Kaus, VDARE contributor on Michelle Obama: &#x22;I think she&#x27;s got a chip on her shoulder&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802210006</link>
<description>Discussing recent comments by Michelle Obama, Tucker Carlson said&#x3C;em&#x3E;:&#x3C;/em&#x3E; &#x22;I have thought from Day One that Michelle Obama, impressive as she is, clearly intelligent, very handsome, self-possessed -- I think that she&#x27;s got a chip on her shoulder.&#x22; Similarly, Slate.com blogger Mickey Kaus wrote of Michelle Obama: &#x22;For whatever reason, she sure seems to have a non-trivial chip on her shoulder and it&#x27;s not a winning quality.&#x22; Additionally, referring to a February 16 &#x3C;em&#x3E;Newsweek &#x3C;/em&#x3E;profile, VDARE.com contributor Steve Sailer wrote that Michelle Obama &#x22;sounds like she&#x27;s got a log-sized chip on her shoulder from lucking into Princeton due to affirmative action.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802210006</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:21:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>O&#x27;Reilly: &#x22;I don&#x27;t want to go on a lynching party against Michelle Obama unless there&#x27;s evidence, hard facts, that say this is how the woman really feels&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802200001</link>
<description>In a discussion of recent comments made by Michelle Obama, Bill O&#x27;Reilly took a call from a listener who stated that, according to &#x22;a friend who had knowledge of her,&#x22; Obama &#x22; &#x27;is a very angry,&#x27; her word was &#x27;militant woman.&#x27; &#x22; O&#x27;Reilly later stated: &#x22;I don&#x27;t want to go on a lynching party against Michelle Obama unless there&#x27;s evidence, hard facts, that say this is how the woman really feels. If that&#x27;s how she really feels -- that America is a bad country or a flawed nation, whatever -- then that&#x27;s legit. We&#x27;ll track it down.&#x22;&#x3C;br /&#x3E;
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802200001</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:32:32 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ignoring contrary polling, &#x3C;em&#x3E;WSJ&#x3C;/em&#x3E; claimed &#x22;Mr. McCain might enter a race versus Mr. Obama with an advantage among Hispanic voters&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802150014</link>
<description>A &#x3C;em&#x3E;Wall Street Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article about a hypothetical general election matchup between Republican Sen. John McCain and Democratic Sen. Barack Obama asserted that &#x22;Mr. McCain might enter a race versus Mr. Obama with an advantage among Hispanic voters.&#x22; However, recent polls have found that significantly more Hispanics would vote for Obama than McCain in a head-to-head contest.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802150014</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 19:32:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; runs column on Obama under the headline: &#x22;Black horse&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802050004</link>
<description>A &#x3C;em&#x3E;Washington Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; column reporting that Chris Matthews spoke about Sen. Barack Obama&#x27;s presidential candidacy and the &#x22;galloping horse of history&#x22; ran under the headline &#x22;Black horse.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802050004</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 Feb 2008 13:51:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>