<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Richard Poe</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/richard_poe</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Richard Poe</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>Poe responds to &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E; (again)</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200611170013</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200611170013</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 18:26:35 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Facts, lies, and Richard Poe</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200611170004</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200611170004</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 09:39:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>After three weeks, still no sign of Horowitz&#x27;s and Poe&#x27;s &#x22;exhaustive&#x22; rebuttals to &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27; debunking of &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Shadow Party&#x3C;/em&#x3E;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608240006</link>
<description>Three weeks after promising an &#x22;exhaustive&#x22; and &#x22;full-blown&#x22; response to &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27; extensive critique of their new book, &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Shadow Party&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, David Horowitz and Richard Poe have yet to issue one. Meanwhile, Horowitz and Poe wrote a letter to &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Wall Street Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E; containing a straw man argument to attack Democrats.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608240006</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 14:59:59 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>A week passes, more promises from Horowitz and Poe, but still no &#x22;exhaustive&#x22; rebuttal to &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608090013</link>
<description>David Horowitz and Richard Poe have yet to issue their promised rebuttal to &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27; item documenting doctored quotes, shoddy scholarship, factual errors, and baseless insinuations in their book &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Shadow Party&#x3C;/em&#x3E;. Poe has claimed, however, that he and Horowitz are working on an &#x22;effective&#x22; rebuttal and vowed that &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E; &#x22;will regret having asked for it.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608090013</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 9 Aug 2006 18:06:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Horowitz and Poe promised &#x22;full-blown&#x22; rebuttals to &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27; debunking of &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Shadow Party&#x3C;/em&#x3E; -- so what&#x27;s taking so long?</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608080004</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608080004</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 8 Aug 2006 13:17:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>