<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Robert Novak</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/robert_novak</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Robert Novak</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>Novak falsely suggested Obama was discussing abortion when he made &#x22;punished with a baby&#x22; comment</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200805270004</link>
<description>In his column, Robert Novak wrote, &#x22;[Sen. Barack] Obama, while asserting that &#x27;nobody is pro-abortion,&#x27; has said that if his two daughters &#x27;make a mistake, I don&#x27;t want them punished with a baby,&#x27; &#x22; falsely suggesting that Obama was discussing abortion when he said that if his two daughters were to &#x22;make a mistake, I don&#x27;t want them punished with a baby.&#x22; However, as video of the campaign event at which Obama made his comments shows, he was not referring to abortion but was instead referring to sex education.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200805270004</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 15:25:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Novak falsely suggested House Dems allowed FISA to lapse  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802190005</link>
<description>Robert Novak asserted that &#x22;[a] closed-door caucus of House Democrats&#x22; had &#x22;instructed Speaker Nancy Pelosi to call President Bush&#x27;s bluff on extending the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) to continue eavesdropping on suspected foreign terrorists&#x22; and that &#x22;Majority Leader Steny Hoyer said there was no danger in letting the FISA legislation lapse temporarily.&#x22; In fact, FISA did not lapse or expire; what expired was the Protect America Act (PAA), which amended FISA. Additionally, Novak falsely stated that &#x22;the Democratic leadership Wednesday brought up another bill simply extending FISA authority, this time for 21 days&#x22; and that most of the Democrats who voted against the bill &#x22;intuitively oppose any anti-terrorist proposal.&#x22; In fact, the House voted on an extension to the PAA, not FISA, and most of the Democrats who voted against the extension have supported other bills to allow surveillance of suspected terrorists.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802190005</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:58:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Citing admittedly flawed Zogby poll, Novak claimed Obama result in CA &#x22;raises the specter of the ... &#x27;Bradley effect&#x27; &#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802110009</link>
<description>Citing a &#x22;Zogby poll that showed a big Obama lead in California,&#x22; Robert D. Novak asserted that Sen. Barack Obama&#x27;s defeat in the California presidential primary &#x22;raises the specter of the dreaded &#x27;Bradley effect.&#x27; &#x22; But in explaining why his poll showing Obama leading in California by 13 points did not match the actual results, John Zogby wrote: &#x22;It appears that we underestimated Hispanic turnout and overestimated the importance of younger Hispanic voters. We also overestimated turnout among African-American voters.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802110009</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 20:01:27 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Novak  falsely claimed Clinton did not argue &#x22;until her  presidential campaign&#x22; that Levin amendment would subordinate  U.S. decisions to the U.N.    </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802040009</link>
<description>While writing that Sen. Clinton said &#x22;she opposed the Levin amendment to the  2003 [sic] Iraq war  resolution because it would &#x27;subordinate&#x27; U.S. decision-making to the United Nations,&#x22;  Robert Novak falsely claimed that Clinton &#x22;made no such claim until her  presidential campaign.&#x22; In fact, the same day Clinton voted on Sen. Carl Levin&#x27;s proposed amendment to  the 2002 resolution authorizing the use of force against Iraq, she gave a floor speech that included her  reason for opposing a proposal that the United States &#x22;should only resort to  force if and when the United Nations Security Council approves it.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802040009</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 4 Feb 2008 18:13:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Novak repeated  false assertion that Bill Clinton &#x22;referred to Obama&#x27;s candidacy as &#x27;a fairy  tale&#x27; &#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200801170009</link>
<description>Nationally syndicated columnist Robert Novak falsely asserted that former  President Bill Clinton had &#x22;referred to [Sen. Barack] Obama&#x27;s candidacy as &#x27;a  fairy tale.&#x27; &#x22; Clinton in fact described as the  &#x22;biggest fairy tale&#x22; Obama&#x27;s statements about his position on the Iraq  war.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200801170009</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:55:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Novak: &#x22;only the naive can believe&#x22; Clinton&#x27;s emotional moment was genuine  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200801100004</link>
<description>Discussing a recent campaign event during which Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton&#x27;s voice broke as she talked about why she is seeking the presidency, Robert Novak wrote that &#x22;only the naive can believe Clinton was not artfully playing for sympathy from her sisters.&#x22; Novak&#x27;s remarks echoed other media figures who characterized Clinton&#x27;s emotional moment as &#x22;pretend[]&#x22; or not &#x22;genuine&#x22; or &#x22;calculated.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200801100004</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 11:01:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Novak again  asserted that Armitage&#x27;s role in leak case exonerates  Rove</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708140008</link>
<description>In a column discussing 
Karl Rove&#x27;s resignation, Robert D. Novak asserted that 
&#x22;[a]lthough [special counsel Patrick] Fitzgerald knew from the start that not 
Rove but the politically nondescript Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage 
was my primary source in identifying Valerie Plame as a CIA employee, the 
prosecutor came close to indicting Rove for perjury or obstruction of justice.&#x22; 
However, Rove confirmed 
the information Armitage divulged, as Novak himself has admitted.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708140008</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 19:25:34 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Novak lauded  Thompson&#x27;s &#x22;cool reaction to crises&#x22; as Watergate counsel -- but he was Nixon  mole</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708020009</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708020009</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 2 Aug 2007 18:35:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Novak  ignored potential violations of law in column about Waxman&#x27;s &#x22;grand  inquisition&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200707260008</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200707260008</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 16:33:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Claiming &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E; is &#x22;very angry at me,&#x22; a broken-hearted Scarborough still insists &#x22;no underlying crime&#x22; in Plame case</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200707200012</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200707200012</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 14:58:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Morning Joe&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, John Ridley &#x22;hope[s]&#x22; Novak will &#x22;clarify&#x22; his &#x3C;em&#x3E;Meet the Press&#x3C;/em&#x3E; comments</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200707180008</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200707180008</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 17:11:22 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Novak&#x27;s disparate treatment: Reports Dem under FBI investigation, but only that GOP congressman&#x27;s conduct &#x22;raised ethical questions&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200707160001</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200707160001</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 11:43:10 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>During all-white-male &#x3C;em&#x3E;Meet the Press&#x3C;/em&#x3E; panel, Novak claimed &#x22;woman or an African-American&#x22; Dem nominee would give GOP &#x22;hope&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200707150002</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200707150002</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 14:22:22 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>In new book, Novak distorts events to support assertion that Armitage leak was not &#x22;planned&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200707140002</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200707140002</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 23:00:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>In excerpt of forthcoming book, Novak offers yet another account of his Armitage conversation</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200707090006</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200707090006</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Jul 2007 19:33:25 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>