<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Ron Paul</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/ron_paul</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Ron Paul</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>Hannity  dismissed Fox text-message  polls as &#x22;just a lot of fun&#x22; when results favored Paul, but not when results  favored Bush</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200710220006</link>
<description>Noting that a Fox News text-message poll following the October 21 Republican 
presidential debate put Ron Paul in first place, Sean Hannity said, &#x22;Oh, this 
poll -- you&#x27;ve got all your supporters calling.&#x22; Paul responded: &#x22;What, you mean 
your own poll isn&#x27;t any good?&#x22; Hannity then said: &#x22;No, it&#x27;s just a lot of fun.&#x22; 
But Hannity has previously touted the results of the same type of text-message 
poll when those results were favorable for President Bush: In January, Hannity 
noted several times that &#x22;85 percent&#x22; of viewers who voted by text message said 
that Bush did an &#x22;excellent&#x22; job in his State of the Union address.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200710220006</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 17:26:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Noting  Huckabee-Paul  debate disagreement on Iraq, Luntz  declared  Huckabee&#x27;s position &#x22;principle[d]&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200709070003</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Hannity &#x26;amp; Colmes&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, 
Republican pollster 
Frank Luntz cited Republican focus group responses to an exchange over 
Iraq policy between Mike 
Huckabee and Rep. Ron Paul, and, echoing Huckabee&#x27;s assertion about needing not 
&#x22;to lose our honor,&#x22; declared: &#x22;Clearly, principle won out in this exchange.&#x22; 
Luntz cited no evidence that the focus group participants favored Huckabee&#x27;s 
comments because they thought that the comments -- in contrast with Paul&#x27;s -- 
were based on &#x22;principle.&#x22; In fact, Paul&#x27;s position on the 
Iraq war has been consistent, though 
originally sharply at odds with public opinion.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200709070003</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 Sep 2007 09:28:22 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>AP uncritically reported groups&#x27; reasons for excluding Ron Paul from Iowa forum</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200706280007</link>
<description>The Associated Press uncritically reported that Republican
presidential candidate Ron Paul was excluded from the Iowa presidential forum because, according
to one of the groups sponsoring the event, Paul &#x22;didn&#x27;t meet the
criteria the groups drew up,&#x22; including &#x22;having an established exploratory committee and garnering at least 1 percent in a
national poll.&#x22; The AP did not mention that Paul established his
presidential exploratory committee months before invitations for the forum were
sent and was polling at 1 percent in at least one national poll at that time.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200706280007</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 18:29:11 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Klein wrote of Paul&#x27;s &#x22;singular moment of weirdness&#x22; at debate, but 9-11 report supports his claim&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200705190001</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200705190001</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 20:01:11 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media echoed, applauded Giuliani&#x27;s distortion of Paul&#x27;s comments about 9-11 attacks</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200705160009</link>
<description>Several media figures mischaracterized a response that Rep. Ron Paul gave at the Republican debate, with some asserting that Paul had &#x22;blamed&#x22;
the United
 States
for the 9-11 terrorist
attacks and others simply accepting Rudy Giuliani&#x27;s misrepresentation of Paul&#x27;s statement -- that the United
  States
had &#x22;invited the attack.&#x22; In
fact, Paul did not blame the United States for the 9-11 attacks or say that the United States
had &#x22;invited&#x22; them.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200705160009</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 17:25:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>