<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Sally Quinn</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/sally_quinn</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Sally Quinn</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Morning Joe&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Quinn repeated claim that Clinton and Silda Wall Spitzer stand beside their husbands because &#x22;they don&#x27;t want to lose that power&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200803130001</link>
<description>Discussing the scandal involving New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer and why &#x22;wives go out and stand beside their husbands,&#x22; &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Sally Quinn said on MSNBC&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;Morning Joe&#x3C;/em&#x3E;: &#x22;The only thing I can think of is that women who are married to these powerful men have -- the power that they have is derivative. They get their power from their men and their status and that they don&#x27;t want to lose that power.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200803130001</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:34:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash&#x3C;/em&#x3E;.&#x3C;em&#x3E; Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Quinn suggested &#x22;personal ambition&#x22; led Clinton and Silda Wall Spitzer to &#x22;stand by her man&#x22; because &#x22;there was something in it for her&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200803120005</link>
<description>In a report on &#x22;powerful men who cheat and the women who stand stoically by them,&#x22; CBS News&#x27; Nancy Cordes aired a clip of &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Sally Quinn saying, &#x22;I can only think that ambition, their own personal ambition, is part of why they stick by these men, because they are accomplished women in their own right. And so, why would a Hillary Clinton or a Silda [Wall Spitzer] stand by her man and allow herself to be humiliated unless there was something in it for her?&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200803120005</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:00:15 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>