<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Sam Brownback</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/sam_brownback</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Sam Brownback</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>In report on Brownback, CNN did not mention reported shift in abortion rights position</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200702140002</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200702140002</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 11:06:18 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Stephanopoulos called Brownback &#x22;pro-family&#x22; because he is &#x22;a true conservative&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200701230002</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200701230002</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 11:20:49 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;NY Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, CNN reported Bush signed &#x22;fetal farming&#x22; ban, failed to note there is no such thing as &#x22;fetal farming&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200607220003</link>
<description>In their coverage of President Bush&#x27;s recent veto of embryonic stem cell legislation, &#x3C;em&#x3E;The New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; and CNN reported that Bush also signed a bill that day banning &#x22;fetal farming&#x22; -- creating embryos or fetuses specifically for use as a source of cells or tissue. But neither noted that &#x22;fetal farming&#x22; is neither being carried out, nor is it &#x22;under serious scientific consideration,&#x22; as National Public Radio&#x27;s Julie Rovner reported.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200607220003</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 20:29:25 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Matthews mix-up: falsely suggested censure supporters were only members of Congress questioning legality of warrantless surveillance program</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200604040006</link>
<description>Chris Matthews falsely conflated those members of Congress who have publicly supported Sen. Russ Feingold&#x27;s resolution to censure President Bush over his warrantless domestic eavesdropping program and the far larger group who has said that Bush might have acted illegally in authorizing the program.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200604040006</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 4 Apr 2006 16:47:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; neglected to note Brownback&#x27;s conflicting statements on political tests for Supreme Court nominees</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200601100006</link>
<description>Following the first day of Samuel A. Alito Jr.&#x27;s Supreme Court nomination hearing, &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; reported that Sen. Sam Brownback (R-KS) said, &#x22;The idea that there are spots on the Supreme Court reserved for certain ideologies is a falsehood. Seats on the bench are not reserved for causes or interests.&#x22; But the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; failed to note that Brownback made contradictory remarks last October, when he reportedly said he would consider voting against former Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers over the question of her willingness to revisit &#x3C;em&#x3E;Roe v. Wade&#x3C;/em&#x3E;.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200601100006</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 17:43:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>FOX&#x27;s Garrett let GOP senator mislead on RU-486</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200411300007</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200411300007</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2004 16:32:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s Blitzer let Brownback get away with 527 disclosure lie</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200408310014</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200408310014</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2004 19:28:52 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>