<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - San Francisco Chronicle</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/san_francisco_chronicle</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: San Francisco Chronicle</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;SF Chronicle&#x3C;/em&#x3E; did not report that McCain&#x27;s claim, &#x22;We have drawn down to pre-surge levels,&#x22; was false    </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806010001</link>
<description>Reporting that Sen. John McCain &#x22;had to defend his [May 29] comments that U.S. troops are down to &#x27;presurge level,&#x27; &#x22; the &#x3C;em&#x3E;San Francisco Chronicle&#x3C;/em&#x3E; did not point out that McCain&#x27;s statement was false. As &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; noted, there are about 155,000 troops in Iraq, well above the 130,000 there before the increase. Further, in reporting that McCain &#x22;insisted he hadn&#x27;t misspoken,&#x22; the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Chronicle&#x3C;/em&#x3E; did not point out that, in addition to his false statement about troop levels in Iraq, he also &#x22;misspoke[]&#x22; by misstating what he had initially said.    </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200806010001</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 1 Jun 2008 13:05:48 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Cackle joins The Haircut and The Sigh</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200710100002</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200710100002</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 11:29:47 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;S&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x3C;em&#x3E;F  Chronicle&#x3C;/em&#x3E; joined &#x3C;em&#x3E;NY  Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; in false assertion that pro-Obama group allows  supporters to break legal contribution limits</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708090008</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708090008</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Aug 2007 19:01:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Numerous media outlets publish misleading attacks on  decision  to  limit  electronic  voting</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708090007</link>
<description>While reporting on California Secretary of State Debra Bowen&#x27;s decision to 
decertify the state&#x27;s electronic voting machines in light of a study that found 
the systems are vulnerable to security breaches, numerous media outlets attacked 
the study&#x27;s &#x22;unrealistic&#x22; methodology or uncritically reported criticism of the 
study&#x27;s premise, without noting the researchers&#x27; explanation for their methods.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708090007</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Aug 2007 17:54:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;SF Chronicle &#x3C;/em&#x3E;uncritically reported discredited, anti-gay &#x22;research&#x22; on same-sex parenting</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200705230002</link>
<description>In a
clarification addressing an article on a new campaign encouraging
same-sex parents to adopt foster children, the &#x3C;em&#x3E;San
Francisco Chronicle&#x3C;/em&#x3E; acknowledged
that Family Research Institute director Paul Cameron, whom it had suggested was
an expert on gay issues in its article, had been expelled from the
American Psychological Association and that the institute has been
&#x22;named a hate group.&#x22;
But the clarification did not
address Cameron&#x27;s
discredited claim, reported in the article, that gays &#x22;are more likely to
molest children of their same sex&#x22;; nor did it note that Cameron&#x27;s
&#x22;research&#x22; has been widely discredited.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200705230002</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 12:17:52 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;SF Chronicle&#x3C;/em&#x3E; called Edwards&#x27; speech fee &#x22;whopping&#x22; but ignored Giuliani&#x27;s much larger fees</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200705220007</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200705220007</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 16:41:11 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>What haircut stories tell us about the press</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200705010001</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200705010001</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 1 May 2007 12:25:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>In reporting on White House&#x27;s defense of Pelosi, AP, &#x3C;em&#x3E;SF Chronicle&#x3C;/em&#x3E; articles ignored RNC hit piece</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200702090006</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200702090006</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 8 Feb 2007 20:28:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;SF Chronicle &#x3C;/em&#x3E;purported to present &#x22;[a]rguments for and against&#x22; Proposition 87, but ignored positive health impact</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200611010014</link>
<description>A &#x3C;em&#x3E;San Francisco Chronicle&#x3C;/em&#x3E; voter&#x27;s guide purported to provide the &#x22;[a]rguments
for and against&#x22; California ballot
initiative Proposition 87 to impose a tax on California&#x27;s oil producers. But the guide
failed to mention one of the major arguments of the initiative&#x27;s
proponents -- positive impact on California&#x27;s
air quality and health.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200611010014</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Nov 2006 18:48:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Editorial pages offer variety of takes on Foley scandal</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200610100013</link>
<description>Newspaper editorial boards have responded with a variety of opinions to the Mark Foley scandal, from calling for -- or opposing -- House Speaker Dennis Hastert&#x27;s resignation to noting the &#x22;rank hypocrisy&#x22; of Republican leaders to referring to the Republicans&#x27; attempt to use a &#x22;gay scapegoat.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200610100013</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 16:51:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Katie and Rush and the face of corporate news</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200609120003</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200609120003</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 11:25:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>