<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Separation of Church and State</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/separation_of_church_and_state</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Separation of Church and State</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>CNN reporters falsely suggested Democrats are only now talking about religious beliefs and values</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200706060002</link>
<description>On June 4 and 5, several CNN correspondents
suggested that, until recently, Democrats have largely been silent on their religious
beliefs and &#x22;values,&#x22; ignoring the fact that presidential
candidates, including John Edwards, and Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack
Obama, among other Democrats, have talked about their religious faith and
values for years. Several of the Democratic candidates referred explicitly to
&#x22;values&#x22; or &#x22;morals&#x22; during the June 3 presidential
debate, which aired on
CNN.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200706060002</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 Jun 2007 20:17:09 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>AFA&#x27;s Wildmon, Focus on the Family&#x27;s Minnery attacked reporter for publishing Dobson&#x27;s questioning of Thompson&#x27;s faith</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200704060002</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200704060002</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Apr 2007 09:28:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>O&#x27;Reilly: &#x22;[I]s there a 50 Cent that we have to put up&#x22; for Kwanzaa?</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200612210011</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200612210011</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 17:44:04 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>O&#x27;Reilly falsely claimed Best Buy employee confirmed ban on &#x22;Merry Christmas&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200612200012</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200612200012</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 17:47:18 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>O&#x27;Reilly ignored First Amendment, misrepresented Jefferson&#x27;s position</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200612150010</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200612150010</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:48:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>O&#x27;Reilly still blasting retail chains for apocryphal &#x22;Merry Christmas&#x22; ban</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200612010011</link>
<description>On his radio show, Bill O&#x27;Reilly claimed that
retailers Best Buy and Crate &#x26;amp; Barrel are &#x22;still ordering their
people not to say,
&#x27;Merry Christmas,&#x27; &#x22; and that the stores
&#x22;will fire&#x22; employees who do. According to each store&#x27;s
spokesperson, neither retail chain has such a policy.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200612010011</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 1 Dec 2006 18:52:59 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>No more secrecy -- Christmas must be destroyed!</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200612010006</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200612010006</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 1 Dec 2006 14:21:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x22;War on Penguins&#x22; rages on in Medved&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;USA Today&#x3C;/em&#x3E; op-ed</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200611290008</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200611290008</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 13:04:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Olbermann named O&#x27;Reilly &#x22;Worst Person&#x22; for saying imams kicked off plane &#x22;wouldn&#x27;t get handcuffed in Crate &#x26;amp; Barrel if they started chanting and stuff&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200611290006</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200611290006</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 12:42:48 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>O&#x27;Reilly: Imams kicked off plane &#x22;wouldn&#x27;t get handcuffed ... if they started chanting stuff&#x22; at Crate &#x26;amp; Barrel</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200611280008</link>
<description>Bill O&#x27;Reilly revived the
&#x22;war&#x22; on Christmas and declared that &#x22;[m]aybe the imams who got
thrown off the plane [would] shop&#x22; at the home furnishings retailer Crate
&#x26;amp; Barrel because it has a policy of saying &#x22;Happy Holidays&#x22;
instead of &#x22;Merry Christmas.&#x22; O&#x27;Reilly also declared that
Christmas is &#x22;a secular holiday&#x22; that &#x22;honors the birth of
Jesus. ... And the reason it does is because Jesus was a philosopher,&#x22;
but &#x22;you can have a religious connotation to the holiday if you choose
to.&#x22;

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200611280008</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:17:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Beck hosted Rosenberg to discuss briefing of White House, &#x22;a number of congressional leaders and Homeland Security, Pentagon [officials]&#x22; about &#x22;end of days scenarios&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200610200004</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200610200004</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 20:39:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>O&#x27;Reilly falsely claimed Red Cross symbol was &#x22;adopted&#x22; because of &#x22;Christian philosophy&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200607270002</link>
<description>In a discussion about a lawsuit filed over the presence of a large cross at a war memorial in San Diego, Bill O&#x27;Reilly falsely claimed that the Red Cross &#x22;historically ... adopted&#x22; its emblem &#x22;because of the Christian philosophy of giving alms and giving assistance to people in need.&#x22; In fact, according to the American Red Cross website, it was &#x22;[i]n honor of the Swiss ... [that] the symbol of a red cross on a white background (the reverse of the Swiss flag) was identified as a protective emblem in conflict areas.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200607270002</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 09:13:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Despite his repeated efforts to provoke one, O&#x27;Reilly conceded &#x22;there is no attack on Easter&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200604170006</link>
<description>Despite his repeated attempts in recent weeks to suggest that &#x22;secular progressives&#x22; have waged a &#x22;war on Easter&#x22; resembling the purported &#x22;war on Christmas,&#x22; Bill O&#x27;Reilly admitted that &#x22;there is no attack on Easter.&#x22; Further, O&#x27;Reilly congratulated himself for the lack of Easter attacks, stating, &#x22;[A]fter the thumping that the department stores and all-over crazies took over Christmas, these people say, &#x27;You know, I don&#x27;t think we want to come up against O&#x27;Reilly and these other people on Easter. Let&#x27;s just let it go.&#x27; &#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200604170006</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 17:38:47 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Hawking his new book, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Newsweek&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Meacham joined O&#x27;Reilly&#x27;s ACLU-bashing</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200604120007</link>
<description>Appearing on Fox News&#x27; &#x3C;em&#x3E;The O&#x27;Reilly Factor&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Newsweek&#x3C;/em&#x3E; managing editor Jon Meacham agreed that the founding fathers would have disapproved of -- as host Bill O&#x27;Reilly termed it -- the ACLU&#x27;s opposition to the &#x22;Pledge of Allegiance ... God, Christmas icons.&#x22; Further, Meacham did not dispute O&#x27;Reilly&#x27;s characterization of the ACLU as engaged in a &#x22;jihad ... against Judeo-Christian tradition in this country.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200604120007</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 15:33:18 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Did O&#x27;Reilly declare &#x22;culture war&#x22; over?</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200603310010</link>
<description>On March 29, Bill O&#x27;Reilly appeared to declare that the so-called &#x22;culture war&#x22; he has waged is over, saying, &#x22;I don&#x27;t feel persecuted as a Christian&#x22; because &#x22;I can still do what I want to do.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200603310010</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 15:18:58 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>