<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Social Security</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/social_security</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Social Security</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Post&#x27;s&#x3C;/em&#x3E; Bacon falsely suggested private accounts would address Social Security&#x27;s projected long-term revenue shortfall  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200807090001</link>
<description>In a &#x3C;em&#x3E;Washington Post &#x3C;/em&#x3E;article, Perry Bacon Jr. listed &#x22;allowing younger workers to put money they currently pay for Social Security taxes into personal savings accounts&#x22; as one of &#x22;an array of ideas&#x22; that aides to Sen. John McCain &#x22;indicated&#x22; he &#x22;could support&#x22; in &#x22;finding a solution to the long-term solvency of&#x22; Social Security. But Bacon did not note that the Bush administration has admitted that private accounts themselves would do nothing to address Social Security&#x27;s projected long-term revenue shortfall.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200807090001</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 9 Jul 2008 10:46:25 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x27;s &#x3C;/em&#x3E;Smith falsely suggested Clinton criticized Obama&#x27;s specific Social Security proposal  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806130005</link>
<description>The &#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Ben Smith falsely suggested that Sen. Hillary Clinton criticized Sen. Barack Obama&#x27;s proposal to address the solvency of Social Security, which includes raising the payroll tax on workers earning more than $250,000 per year. In fact, while Clinton said in November 2007 that she opposes &#x22;lift[ing] the cap completely,&#x22; she has not said that she opposes raising the cap on payroll taxes if the plan to do so includes a so-called &#x22;doughnut hole&#x22; exempting those earning less than $250,000 from a tax increase, as Obama has proposed.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200806130005</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 15:25:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;WSJ&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Moore echoed George Will falsehood that Social Security taxes are levied on household income  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806110005</link>
<description>The &#x3C;em&#x3E;Wall Street Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Stephen Moore asserted that Sen. Barack Obama &#x22;has vowed ... to end the cap on Social Security taxes, which amounts to a tax hike on anyone who makes more than $100,000 in income,&#x22; and he later asserted that &#x22;New York Rep. Joseph Crowley says a couple with earnings of $100,000 could be &#x27;a police officer and nurse.&#x27; &#x27;In New York City,&#x27; he adds, &#x27;they&#x27;d be struggling.&#x27; &#x22; Moore&#x27;s inclusion of a reference to &#x22;a couple ... [who] could be &#x27;a police officer and nurse&#x27; &#x22; falsely suggests that Social Security taxes are assessed on households. In fact, Social Security payroll taxes are assessed on individual income.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200806110005</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:53:20 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s Chernoff  falsely claimed Social Security will &#x22;be out of money in  2041&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200801230001</link>
<description>CNN senior correspondent Allan Chernoff falsely asserted on &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Situation Room&#x3C;/em&#x3E; that Social Security  &#x22;will go bust, be out of money, in 2041.&#x22; In fact, according to a 2007 federal  report, &#x22;[p]resent tax rates would be sufficient to pay 75 percent of scheduled  benefits after trust fund exhaustion in 2041 and 70 percent of scheduled  benefits in 2081.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200801230001</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:36:49 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Will  falsely suggested Sen. Clinton&#x27;s support of tax credits for private retirement  investment is new</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200710180003</link>
<description>George Will wrote that Sen. Clinton &#x22;stridently opposed&#x22; President Bush&#x27;s 
&#x22;advocacy of personal accounts financed by a portion of individuals&#x27; Social 
Security taxes&#x22; and suggested that her recent proposal to offer a matching tax 
credit to families that invest in 401(k) retirement accounts reflects &#x22;an 
undisclosed epiphany,&#x22; after which &#x22;she belatedly recognizes that 401(k) funds 
invested in equities are a foundation for security.&#x22; But contrary to Will&#x27;s 
suggestion, Clinton has long expressed support for tax 
credits for retirement investments, while opposing the diversion of Social 
Security payments into private accounts.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200710180003</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 11:02:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;USA Today&#x3C;/em&#x3E; editorial suggested Bush&#x27;s Social Security plan would have defused &#x22;underfunding time bomb&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708140006</link>
<description>In an editorial, &#x3C;em&#x3E;USA
Today&#x3C;/em&#x3E; suggested that President Bush&#x27;s proposal to &#x22;partially
privatize Social Security&#x22; would have addressed the program&#x27;s &#x22;underfunding
time bomb, set to detonate in about a decade.&#x22; But as &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media
Matters for America &#x3C;/em&#x3E;has repeatedly noted, even the administration has acknowledged that
its plan for private
Social Security accounts --
on their own -- will do nothing to address the &#x22;time bomb.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708140006</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 18:46:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Blitzer falsely claimed Social Security will &#x22;run[] out of money&#x22; in 2041</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200704240008</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200704240008</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:57:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;NY Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; misstated Republicans&#x27; Social Security proposal as attempt to &#x22;add&#x22; private accounts</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200605180014</link>
<description>A &#x3C;em&#x3E;New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article about new Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee radio advertisements on Social Security incorrectly stated that the ads &#x22;try to remind those who traditionally vote Republican of their party&#x27;s plan to add private investment accounts&#x22; to the retirement program. In fact, President Bush did not propose adding accounts to the existing system; instead, he proposed allowing workers to divert up to 4 percent of wages (about one-third of their payroll taxes) into a private account, removing it from the money available to pay Social Security benefits for current retirees.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200605180014</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 17:16:04 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Vargas revived misinformation commonly reported in 2005 that Social Security will &#x22;run out of money&#x22; in early 2040s</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200605030013</link>
<description>ABC &#x3C;em&#x3E;World News Tonight&#x3C;/em&#x3E; anchor Elizabeth Vargas -- repeating a false characterization by the Bush administration that has been repeatedly debunked -- described the revised estimates for when the Social Security and Medicare programs&#x27; respective trust funds will become depleted as &#x22;the day when the Social Security and Medicare programs run out of money.&#x22; In fact, neither program would &#x22;run out of money&#x22; when its trust fund became depleted.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200605030013</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 May 2006 17:49:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>USA Next&#x27;s Jarvis resurfaced to smear AARP</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200509150004</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200509150004</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2005 16:45:20 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x22;The Point&#x27;s&#x22; Social Security falsehoods continue: Hyman offered misinformation about married couples&#x27; benefits</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200508310003</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200508310003</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 18:43:20 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Hyman misleadingly claimed that Social Security &#x22;discriminates against minorities&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200508300006</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200508300006</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2005 19:03:25 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Lambro penned misleading news report on &#x22;grow accounts&#x22; in &#x22;news,&#x22; followed by &#x22;commentary&#x22; praising them</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200508230003</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200508230003</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 12:24:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Only on Fox: &#x22;Kill Social Security!&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200508170003</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200508170003</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 14:06:49 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;i&#x3E;Wash. Post&#x3C;/i&#x3E; left readers hanging with he-said/she-said on factual question about Social Security</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200506270001</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200506270001</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 13:58:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>