<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Stem Cell Research</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/stem_cell_research</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Stem Cell Research</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>Message to media: Bush first to fund stem cell research only because GOP Congress blocked Clinton plan</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200706210016</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200706210016</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 18:41:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article on Bush stem cell plan ignored scientists&#x27; support for bill Bush vetoed</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200706200005</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200706200005</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 16:08:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fox News&#x27; Herridge misinformed on whether new method can supplant stem cell research</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200706100002</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200706100002</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2007 13:21:10 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s Koppel uncritically reported GOP argument that new research moots stem cell debate</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200706080004</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200706080004</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 8 Jun 2007 15:02:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Krauthammer misrepresented Edwards&#x27; stem cell comments, Democratic stem cell bill</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200701130001</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200701130001</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:29:48 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On stem cells, CNN gives equal billing to conservative activist, scientific consensus</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200701090015</link>
<description>A CNN report on stem cells
derived from amniotic fluid equated an opponent of embryonic stem cell research
who has peddled a discredited list of ailments purportedly treatable from adult
stem cell research with &#x22;other scientists&#x22; who &#x22;argue that
embryonic stem cells are unique and hold the power to potentially cure many
diseases.&#x22;

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200701090015</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 9 Jan 2007 18:34:02 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Hannity: Stem cell research advocated by &#x22;the Michael J. Fox wing of [Pelosi&#x27;s] party&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200701050009</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200701050009</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 5 Jan 2007 16:22:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;NY Sun&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, &#x3C;em&#x3E;National Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E; repeated falsehoods about Majority Action ad criticizing Walsh on stem cell research</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200611010006</link>
<description>In a recent article, &#x3C;em&#x3E;The&#x3C;/em&#x3E; &#x3C;em&#x3E;New York Sun&#x3C;/em&#x3E; uncritically reported the false assertion by Rep. James
Walsh&#x27;s campaign that a Majority Action ad claims that Walsh
&#x22;favors a ban on stem cell research.&#x22; Similarly, the &#x3C;em&#x3E;National Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E; reported Walsh&#x27;s
claim that the ad is &#x22;false and misleading,&#x22; without noting that
Walsh in fact opposes federal funding for embryonic stem cell research.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200611010006</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Nov 2006 12:01:27 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ingraham likened embryonic stem cell research to &#x22;public executions of child molesters&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200610310015</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200610310015</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 15:39:48 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s Beck, Fox&#x27;s Angle misleadingly claimed Bush &#x22;was the first president to ever actually give federal funding to stem cell research&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200610300003</link>
<description>CNN&#x27;s Glenn Beck and Fox News&#x27; Jim
Angle repeated the misleading claim that President Bush was &#x22;the first&#x22;
president to allow funding for human embryonic stem cell research, even though
the Clinton administration drafted guidelines to fund embryonic stem cell
research, but those rules had yet to take effect when he left office and were
suspended by the Bush administration in favor of its own, stricter set of
rules.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200610300003</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 13:49:43 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Limbaugh &#x22;apologize[d]&#x22; for being &#x22;wrong&#x22; that Michael J. Fox &#x22;didn&#x27;t take his medication,&#x22; then suggested Fox over-medicated himself &#x22;so you would really, really hate Republicans&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200610270019</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200610270019</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 19:21:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Limbaugh falsely claimed of Michael J. Fox: &#x22;[E]very one of his ads is run for the benefit of a Democrat&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200610260011</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200610260011</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 15:50:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Limbaugh still defending his Michael J. Fox attacks; MSNBC&#x27;s Slager falsely asserted Fox &#x22;has not said whether or not&#x22; he took medication before making ads</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200610260002</link>
<description>Rush Limbaugh defended his criticism of Michael J. Fox, claiming: &#x22;Daffy Duck could have done a commercial for Claire McCaskill, saying the same things that Fox did, misleading about stem cell research ... and my reaction would&#x27;ve been the same.&#x22; MSNBC&#x27;s Melissa Slager said that Fox &#x22;has not said whether or not he took&#x22; his Parkinson&#x27;s medication during the shooting of his political ads, even though &#x3C;em&#x3E;The New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; reported that a Fox spokesman &#x22;said his tremors were caused by his medication.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200610260002</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 20:25:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media falsely reported Limbaugh &#x22;apologized&#x22; for attacking Michael J. Fox</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200610250014</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200610250014</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 16:47:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Limbaugh likened Michael J. Fox to &#x22;Jersey Girls,&#x22; declared stem cell ad part of &#x22;a script that they [Democrats] have written for years&#x22; in which &#x22;victims&#x22; are &#x22;infallible&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200610250005</link>
<description>Rush Limbaugh likened Michael J. Fox -- who has Parkinson&#x27;s disease and appeared in a recent campaign advertisement for Missouri Democratic Senate candidate Claire McCaskill -- to the &#x22;Jersey Girls&#x22; group of 9-11 widows, claiming that Fox&#x27;s ad is part of &#x22;a script that they [Democrats] have written for years&#x22; in which &#x22;victims of various diseases or social concerns or poverty&#x22; are &#x22;infallible, whatever they say cannot be challenged.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200610250005</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 21:03:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>