<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Stephen F. Hayes</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/stephen_f__hayes</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Stephen F. Hayes</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Weekly Standard&#x27;s&#x3C;/em&#x3E; Hayes notes &#x22;significant problems&#x22; with Corsi book, but promotes problematic Freddoso book</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200808140006</link>
<description>On CNN, &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Weekly Standard&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Stephen Hayes said that Jerome Corsi&#x27;s falsehood-laden book &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Obama Nation &#x22;&#x3C;/em&#x3E;certainly sounds like it has some significant problems with it.&#x22; Later, speaking about &#x3C;em&#x3E;National Review&#x3C;/em&#x3E; writer David Freddoso, author of &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Case Against Barack Obama&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Hayes said, &#x22;[H]e&#x27;s a serious reporter, and he&#x27;s ... gone back, he&#x27;s looked at Obama&#x27;s votes in the Illinois state Senate.&#x22; But &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters &#x3C;/em&#x3E;has documented numerous examples of misinformation in Freddoso&#x27;s book, as well as in Corsi&#x27;s.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200808140006</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 18:12:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s  Blitzer failed to note Hayes&#x27; false Iraq-Al Qaeda reporting, Cheney  connections</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200707250010</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200707250010</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 18:06:22 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Cheney biographer  Hayes&#x27; pattern of falsely defending the Bush administration&#x27;s  Iraq  policy</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200707240004</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200707240004</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 15:15:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Official Cheney biographer thoroughly discredited by Senate Intelligence Committee on Iraq connection to 9-11 attacks</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200609210001</link>
<description>Less than two weeks after it was revealed that &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Weekly Standard&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Stephen Hayes had been chosen to write an official biography of Dick Cheney, the Senate Intelligence Committee released a postwar report on Iraq&#x27;s weapons programs and its purported links to terrorism that thoroughly debunked the claim -- repeatedly advanced by Hayes -- that there existed a connection between the government of Saddam Hussein, Al Qaeda, and 9-11.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200609210001</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 20:15:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>For purported facts on Zarqawi, O&#x27;Reilly trusts Stephen Hayes, who &#x22;stands behind his reporting,&#x22; though the Senate Intelligence Committee disputes that &#x22;reporting&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200609130012</link>
<description>When a guest on &#x3C;em&#x3E;The O&#x27;Reilly Factor&#x3C;/em&#x3E; questioned Bill O&#x27;Reilly&#x27;s assertion that a hospital that treated a wounded Abu Musab al-Zarqawi was &#x22;run by Uday Hussein,&#x22; O&#x27;Reilly replied: &#x22;No, that&#x27;s Stephen Hayes, and he stands behind his reporting, although he did make a mistake. ... He said that Zarqawi&#x27;s leg was amputated, and it wasn&#x27;t.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200609130012</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 17:59:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Weekly Standard&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Hayes wrongly suggested that passage in CIA report rebutted &#x3C;em&#x3E;NY Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article on Iraq-Al Qaeda intelligence</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200605020010</link>
<description>In an article in &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Weekly Standard&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, senior writer Stephen F. Hayes attacked a 2003 article by &#x3C;em&#x3E;New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; staff writer James A. Risen that, according to Hayes, falsely claimed the Bush administration had selectively used intelligence to suggest a link between Iraq and Al Qaeda. To refute the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article, Hayes quoted a line allegedly from a CIA report referenced by Risen, but the line does not address the administration&#x27;s alleged selective use of intelligence, or even provide support for the claim of a connection between Iraq and Al Qaeda.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200605020010</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 May 2006 16:55:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Weekly Standard&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Hayes falsely claimed polls show support for Bush on NSA spying</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200601090012</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Weekly Standard&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Stephen Hayes falsely claimed that public polling shows &#x22;support&#x22; for the National Security Agency&#x27;s warrantless domestic spy program. In fact, an AP/Ipsos poll released January 6 shows that 56 percent of Americans said the Bush administration &#x22;[s]hould ... be required to get a warrant from a judge before monitoring phone and internet communications between American citizens in the United States and suspected terrorists.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200601090012</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Jan 2006 17:17:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>