<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Taxes</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/taxes</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Taxes</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Morning Joe&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Harwood again referred to McCain as a &#x22;maverick&#x22; who &#x22;voted against Bush&#x27;s tax cuts&#x22;    </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200805130011</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Morning Joe&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, John Harwood described Sen. John McCain as a &#x22;maverick&#x22; without noting any of the numerous actions McCain has taken that undermine that characterization. Harwood later asserted that McCain &#x22;voted against Bush&#x27;s tax cuts&#x22; without noting that McCain reversed his position on the tax cuts and now calls for making them permanent, or that he has since offered a different explanation about why he voted against them than he gave at the time.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200805130011</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 21:08:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Stephanopoulos left unchallenged McCain&#x27;s assertion that &#x22;every time you have cut capital gains taxes, revenues have increased&#x22;    </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200804220005</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;This Week&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s George Stephanopoulos did not challenge Sen. John McCain&#x27;s assertion that &#x22;history shows every time you have cut capital gains taxes, revenues have increased -- going back to Jack Kennedy.&#x22; Stephanopoulos did not note that, notwithstanding a potential short-term revenue increase, many economists have challenged the claim that revenue goes up over the long term as a result of capital gains tax rates being cut.    </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200804220005</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 17:17:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Gibson&#x27;s capital-gains tax assertion during debate disputed by economists  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200804180012</link>
<description>During the April 16 Democratic presidential debate, Charles Gibson asserted of capital-gains tax cuts that &#x22;in each instance, when the rate dropped, revenues from the tax increased. The government took in more money. And in the 1980s, when the tax was increased to 28 percent, the revenues went down.&#x22; In fact, economists dispute Gibson&#x27;s assertion. Moreover, looking forward, the Joint Committee on Taxation estimated that the 2006 extension of the 2003 cuts on capital-gains taxes would result in decreased revenues over 10 years.     </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200804180012</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 20:41:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>  Following pattern in the media, CNN&#x27;s King uncritically repeated McCain campaign&#x27;s false attacks on Democrats  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200804030007</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Situation Room&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, John King uncritically reported that &#x22;[i]n a statement, a McCain spokesman took a shot at the other party, saying, &#x27;Americans can&#x27;t afford the Democrats&#x27; liberal agenda to raise taxes, nationalize health care, cut off trade, and crush the economy under big government.&#x27; &#x22; Following what has become a pattern in the media, King failed to note the significant falsehoods and misleading claims in McCain&#x27;s statement and simply read it without challenge.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200804030007</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:33:04 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Dobbs claimed there &#x22;isn&#x27;t much difference&#x22; among the three candidates, except on Iraq  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200803310008</link>
<description>CNN&#x27;s Lou Dobbs claimed that, &#x22;with the exception of Iraq, there isn&#x27;t much difference among&#x22; Sens. Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and John McCain. In fact, on health care, Obama and Clinton have both proposed plans to expand coverage, which McCain has denounced. Obama and Clinton also both support comprehensive immigration reform; McCain abandoned his previous support for comprehensive immigration legislation during his campaign for the Republican nomination. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200803310008</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 17:30:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; claimed McCain &#x22;most aggressive&#x22; of the three major candidates in &#x22;identifying ways to reduce spending,&#x22; ignoring cost of Iraq policy  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200803280006</link>
<description>A &#x3C;em&#x3E;Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article claimed that &#x22;[o]f the three candidates, budget analysts said [Sen. John] McCain has been most aggressive at identifying ways to reduce spending.&#x22; While the article noted that &#x22;McCain&#x27;s proposals come nowhere near generating the sums necessary to meet the costs,&#x22; it did not note that, in addition to his proposals to make the Bush tax cuts permanent, those &#x22;costs&#x22; include the war in Iraq, for which, unlike Sens. Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, McCain does not support a timetable for withdrawal.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200803280006</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 16:23:35 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Morning Joe &#x3C;/em&#x3E;allowed McCain adviser to falsely assert Clinton and Obama are &#x22;talking about raising taxes across the board&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200803280003</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Morning Joe&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Joe Scarborough, Willie Geist, and NBC News&#x27; Savannah Guthrie did not challenge senior McCain adviser Steve Schmidt&#x27;s false assertion that &#x22;[w]ith regard to the economy,&#x22; Sens. Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton are &#x22;talking about raising taxes across the board.&#x22; In fact, Obama and Clinton have proposed tax cuts -- not tax increases -- for the poor and the middle class.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200803280003</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:01:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Brzezinski said Obama &#x22;claimed&#x22; McCain &#x22;flip-flopp[ed]&#x22; on Bush tax cuts -- but it&#x27;s not a &#x22;claim&#x22;; it&#x27;s a fact  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200803140009</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;MSNBC Live&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Mika Brzezinski stated that Sen. Barack Obama &#x22;claimed&#x22; that Sen. John McCain &#x22;had initially opposed the tax cuts and was flip-flopping, just to get elected,&#x22; and aired a clip of McCain saying, &#x22;Senator Obama has stated very clearly his desire to increase Americans&#x27; taxes.&#x22; But Brzezinski did not acknowledge that Obama&#x27;s &#x22;claim[]&#x22; that McCain reversed his position on the Bush tax cuts is in fact true, or that, contrary to McCain&#x27;s assertion, Obama has proposed tax cuts for the poor and the middle class.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200803140009</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:48:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ignoring flip-flops, Reuters asserted McCain &#x22;faced a revolt among some conservatives unhappy with his past stances on immigration, tax cuts&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200803030001</link>
<description>Reuters&#x27; John Whitesides wrote that Sen. John McCain &#x22;has faced a revolt among some conservatives unhappy with his past stances on immigration, tax cuts and campaign finance reform, although it has done little to slow his march to the nomination.&#x22; But, in fact, on immigration and taxes, McCain reversed his positions to more closely align himself with the base of the Republican Party.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200803030001</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 3 Mar 2008 13:32:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s Foreman failed to keep McCain honest about his former opposition to the Bush tax cuts  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802190003</link>
<description>CNN&#x27;s Tom Foreman uncritically reported Sen. John McCain&#x27;s claim that he voted against President Bush&#x27;s 2001 and 2003 tax cuts because &#x22;he wanted reductions in spending, too.&#x22; But in a 2001 floor statement explaining his opposition, McCain did not mention the absence of offsetting spending cuts; rather, he stated, &#x22;I cannot in good conscience support a tax cut in which so many of the benefits go to the most fortunate among us, at the expense of middle class Americans who most need tax relief.&#x22; &#x3C;br /&#x3E;
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802190003</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 15:35:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ignoring his costly policies on taxes and Iraq, AP called McCain a &#x22;deficit hawk&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802150010</link>
<description>An Associated Press article described Sen. John McCain as a &#x22;deficit hawk&#x22; but provided no support for that characterization. While the article mentioned that McCain has called for making permanent President Bush&#x27;s 2001 and 2003 tax cuts, it did not note the absence of budget offsets to pay for them. Further, McCain repeatedly voted in favor of emergency supplemental spending bills for the Iraq war that exacerbated the deficit.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802150010</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 17:06:10 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>MSNBC&#x27;s Brewer defended McCain&#x27;s reversals on tax cuts and immigration with falsehoods   </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802140014</link>
<description>MSNBC anchor Contessa Brewer falsely claimed of Sen. John McCain&#x27;s reversal on tax cuts that McCain &#x22;didn&#x27;t want to vote for it because he didn&#x27;t see cuts in spending and he wants to see a fiscally responsible government,&#x22; and she also falsely suggested that McCain did not change his position on the issue of immigration.    </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802140014</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:31:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s Bash uncritically aired McCain&#x27;s false attacks on Democrats on taxes and health care  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802140012</link>
<description>CNN&#x27;s Dana Bash uncritically aired a video clip from Republican Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) making a comparison between &#x22;the Democrats who want to raise your taxes, or me, I want to lower your taxes. Whether it will be a health care system run by the federal government, or whether families in America will make their choices about health care.&#x22; In fact, neither Sen. Hillary Clinton nor Sen. Barack Obama has proposed &#x22;a health care system run by the federal government,&#x22; and both have proposed tax cuts for the poor and the middle class.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802140012</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:10:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;NY Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; reported McCain&#x27;s prior &#x22;differences&#x22; with Bush on tax cuts, but didn&#x27;t note flip-flop  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802110004</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;The New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27; Sheryl Gay Stolberg wrote that Sen. John McCain&#x27;s &#x22;differences with the White House are well known,&#x22; and added: &#x22;He did not vote for the president&#x27;s 2001 and 2003 tax cuts, a sore point with groups like the conservative Club for Growth.&#x22; However, Stolberg did not note that after opposing the Bush tax cuts in 2001 and 2003, McCain now supports making the tax cuts permanent -- a position Bush noted during his Sunday interview.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802110004</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 14:47:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Echoing GOP attack line, Blitzer referred to &#x22;the class warfare argument that the Democrats make&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802040006</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Late Edition&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Wolf Blitzer described opposition to President Bush&#x27;s 2001 tax cuts on the grounds that &#x22;so many of the benefits go to the most fortunate among us at the expense of middle-class Americans who most need tax relief&#x22; as &#x22;almost like the class warfare argument that the Democrats make,&#x22; echoing an attack Republicans commonly use against Democratic positions.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802040006</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 4 Feb 2008 17:27:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>