<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - The Early Show</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/the_early_show</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: The Early Show</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Today&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Early Show &#x3C;/em&#x3E;covered Wright interview, but didn&#x27;t ask McCain about Hagee  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200804250006</link>
<description>NBC&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;Today&#x3C;/em&#x3E; and CBS&#x27; &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Early Show&#x3C;/em&#x3E; both aired interviews with Sen. John McCain while the candidate was in New Orleans, but in neither case asked McCain about controversial comments that one of his endorsers, Pastor John Hagee, recently made about Hurricane Katrina, though both programs discussed controversial comments made by Rev. Jeremiah Wright.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200804250006</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 17:44:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CBS&#x27; Smith failed to challenge claim by McCain&#x27;s campaign manager -- a former lobbyist -- that McCain &#x22;is probably most feared by every lobbyist&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802210013</link>
<description>While discussing a &#x3C;em&#x3E;New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article about Sen. John McCain&#x27;s relationship with a telecommunications lobbyist, CBS &#x3C;em&#x3E;Early Show&#x3C;/em&#x3E; host Harry Smith did not challenge McCain campaign manager Rick Davis when Davis asserted that McCain &#x22;is probably most feared by every lobbyist in this town of Washington&#x22;; he did not note that Davis is a registered lobbyist who, the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Times &#x3C;/em&#x3E;reported, &#x22;represented companies&#x22; before McCain&#x27;s committee.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802210013</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 21:09:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Major newspapers, network news still silent on Romney-Blackwater connection</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200709260015</link>
<description>On September 22, the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico
&#x3C;/em&#x3E;reported that Mitt Romney &#x22;has remained mum on the alleged
killing of 11 Iraqis by a company where one of his top advisers serves as vice
chairman, even as the case has led to an uproar in Baghdad
and Washington.
... The top counterterrorism and national security adviser to Romney&#x27;s
presidential campaign is Cofer Black, vice chairman of Blackwater USA.&#x22;
But despite prominent reports by the
five major newspapers and
the three networks on the Iraqi Interior Ministry revoking Blackwater USA&#x27;s license, none of those outlets has reported on Romney&#x27;s
connection to Blackwater or his refusal to comment on the matter.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200709260015</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 19:37:59 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CBS&#x27; Storm,  Schieffer cropped  Michelle  Obama  quote,  claimed  &#x22;it  may  be  up  to  the  wives  to  criticize&#x22;  Clinton</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708220016</link>
<description>On CBS&#x27; &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Early Show&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Hannah 
Storm told Bob 
Schieffer that &#x22;[a] lot of people ... took&#x22; Michelle Obama&#x27;s 
statement &#x22;as a slam at [Sen.] Hillary Clinton,&#x22; adding: &#x22;She and her husband 
both said, &#x27;Not so,&#x27; but there is a school of thought that says with a woman 
running for the Democratic presidential nominee that it may be up to the wives 
to criticize her because the men can&#x27;t.&#x22; At no point did either Storm or 
Schieffer provide Mrs. Obama&#x27;s full comments, in which she talked about her own 
family and did not refer generally or specifically to any other candidates.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708220016</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 19:19:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media  ignore Rove&#x27;s leak, White House falsehoods, Bush&#x27;s promise to fire  leaker</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708130005</link>
<description>Media outlets reporting on Karl Rove&#x27;s resignation omitted key facts in their discussion 
of Rove&#x27;s involvement in the leak of Valerie Plame&#x27;s identity -- that Rove in fact 
leaked Plame&#x27;s 
identity to columnist Robert Novak and another reporter, that then-White House 
spokesman Scott McClellan initially denied that Rove was involved in the leak, 
and that Rove would not have been able to leave &#x22;on his own terms&#x22; had the White 
House fulfilled a pledge to fire anyone &#x22;involved&#x22; in the Plame 
leak.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708130005</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:25:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media repeated Rove&#x27;s assessment of 2008 election without noting he was wrong in 2006</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708130004</link>
<description>In reports about Karl Rove&#x27;s announcement that he
is resigning as White House deputy chief of staff, numerous news reports
uncritically repeated Rove&#x27;s assessments that President Bush &#x22;will move back up
in the polls&#x22; and that Republicans have &#x22;a very good chance&#x22; of winning the
White House in 2008. However, these outlets did not mention Rove&#x27;s recent track
record: Before the November 2006 midterm elections, he predicted that
Republicans would &#x22;keep&#x22; their majorities in the U.S. House and Senate.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708130004</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 16:12:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>With O&#x27;Hanlon and  Pollack, media once again neglect to ask about military protection and control  of Iraq  itinerary</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708010013</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708010013</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Aug 2007 19:06:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Uncritically airing Giuliani&#x27;s attack, media ignored context of Clinton&#x27;s remarks on taxes</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200705210001</link>
<description>In reporting on Rudy Giuliani&#x27;s Republican
debate performance, several media outlets uncritically repeated his attack on
Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, that &#x22;with regard to taxes,&#x22; she
&#x22;said ... that we have to take money from you in order to give it to
the common good.&#x22; But these outlets did not provide any context for Clinton&#x27;s
remarks, which she reportedly made at a fundraiser in front of an audience that
consisted of people she described as &#x22;well enough off that ... the
[Bush administration] tax cuts may have helped&#x22; them.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200705210001</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 12:10:25 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media failed to explore possible reason for Congress&#x27; transcription demand -- administration&#x27;s record of falsehoods</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200703290010</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200703290010</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 17:35:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Numerous media outlets attribute &#x22;slow bleed&#x22; rhetoric to Democrats</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200702200009</link>
<description>CNN and MSNBC are among the
latest media outlets to suggest that the term &#x22;slow bleed&#x22; was the Democrats&#x27; description
of Rep. John Murtha&#x27;s strategy in dealing with the administration on Iraq.
In fact, the term has been embraced by Republicans to attack Democrats after it
appeared in a &#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico &#x3C;/em&#x3E;article.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200702200009</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 18:57:52 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Who are Sen. Clinton&#x27;s &#x22;evil men&#x22;? Media mind-readers can&#x27;t agree</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200702010001</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200702010001</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Feb 2007 09:41:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Despite lack of timetable, media persist in calling Bush&#x27;s troop increase a &#x22;surge&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200701110013</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200701110013</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:56:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Leaked Giuliani document lays out his potential political troubles -- and still the media look away</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200701040004</link>
<description>Major papers and the broadcast news networks have
either ignored or downplayed the &#x22;personal
and political baggage&#x22; identified by the staff of former New York City mayor and
presumptive 2008 Republican presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani in a document that lays out
his plan for a &#x22;bid for the White House.&#x22;

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200701040004</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 4 Jan 2007 12:38:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>What the media aren&#x27;t telling you about the Iraq Study Group report</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200612080004</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters for America &#x3C;/em&#x3E;has identified six findings in the Iraq Study Group&#x27;s
report that
major news outlets have largely overlooked. They include: that the Pentagon has significantly underreported the extent of
violence in Iraq, that U.S. officials possess little knowledge about
the sources of the ongoing attacks, and that the situation in Afghanistan has grown so dire that U.S. troops may need to be diverted there from Iraq.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200612080004</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 7 Dec 2006 19:35:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media stressed that Clinton had avoided Vietnam service when he visited there, but ignored Bush&#x27;s military service in reporting on his first visit</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200611180005</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200611180005</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 19:57:43 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>