<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - The Note</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/the_note</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: The Note</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>Ignoring polling,  &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Note&#x3C;/em&#x3E; blamed Reid for ensuring  &#x22;the return of polarized Iraq  politics&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200709190011</link>
<description>ABC News&#x27; &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Note&#x3C;/em&#x3E; claimed that 
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, in favoring legislation calling for troop 
withdrawal timelines, &#x22;virtually ensured the return of polarized 
Iraq politics -- and is giving the 
left the showdown (take two) it craves.&#x22; But polling repeatedly shows that a 
significant majority of the country supports withdrawing U.S. troops from Iraq in 
-- at most -- a timeframe that comports with what Reid has 
suggested.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200709190011</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 19:17:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>ABC&#x27;s The Note concluded from &#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; profile that Clinton inner circle is &#x22;sometimes vicious&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200706210003</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200706210003</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 12:35:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media heaped praise on Huckabee&#x27;s &#x22;sexual dig&#x22; at Edwards</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200705160005</link>
<description>Media figures and outlets heaped praise on Mike
Huckabee&#x27;s comment, during the May 15 Republican presidential debate,
that &#x22;[w]e&#x27;ve had a Congress that&#x27;s spent money like John
Edwards at a beauty shop,&#x22; a reference to reports that former Sen. John
Edwards spent $800 of campaign money (which Edwards said was reimbursed) on two
haircuts. ABC News&#x27; The Note, as well as &#x3C;em&#x3E;The
Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Mike Allen called the line an &#x22;instant
classic,&#x22; while &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s
Jonathan Martin predicted that it &#x22;will dominate the news coverage in the
days ahead.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200705160005</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 14:22:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Meet the new Note, same as the old Note</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200705020011</link>
<description>In ABC&#x27;s
The Note, senior
political reporter Rick Klein wrote that &#x22;Democrats will still need to
move toward the Republican position, unless they want to shut down [Iraq] war funding.&#x22; In doing so, Klein suggested that unless congressional Democrats compromise and send President Bush a bill
he finds acceptable, they will be responsible for cutting off
funding to the troops, rather than
Bush being responsible.



&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200705020011</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 2 May 2007 19:47:06 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Can The Note save itself?</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200704030007</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200704030007</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 3 Apr 2007 15:19:34 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>MSNBC, ABC&#x27;s The Note hyped &#x3C;em&#x3E;NY Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; Obama &#x22;scandal,&#x22; despite no evidence of ethical impropriety</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200703070008</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200703070008</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Mar 2007 16:04:22 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>ABC&#x27;s The Note baselessly suggested double standard in media&#x27;s treatment of Pelosi and Gingrich</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200610240007</link>
<description>ABC News&#x27; The Note predicted that prior to the midterm elections, the
&#x22;(liberal) Old Media&#x22; will &#x22;[g]lowingly profile&#x22; House
Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi but &#x22;fail to describe her as &#x27;ultra
liberal&#x27; or &#x27;an extreme liberal,&#x27; which would mirror the way
[former House Speaker Newt] Gingrich was painted twelve years ago.&#x22; But a
&#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E; examination of
coverage found that in 1994, Gingrich was treated in a similar manner to the way Pelosi is treated now.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200610240007</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 12:26:42 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>ABC&#x27;s The Note reported Hastert&#x27;s plan of action to protect congressional pages -- without noting it includes no Democrats</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200610020003</link>
<description>The Note, ABC News&#x27; political newsletter, reported that Speaker of the House J. Dennis Hastert would meet with Rep. John Shimkus, chairman of the House Page Board, and his staff to &#x22;review ways to protect pages while they are serving in the nation&#x27;s Capitol&#x22; in the wake of the revelations of former Rep. Mark Foley&#x27;s allegedly inappropriate email communications with a congressional page, but it did not note the absence of Democrats in Hastert&#x27;s plans.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200610020003</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 Oct 2006 13:07:10 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Buyer&#x27;s remorse: The Bush story the press won&#x27;t tell</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200609190002</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200609190002</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 11:43:22 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Why are the media depicting GOP support for unpopular war as a political winner?</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200606210005</link>
<description>As Senate Democrats debate two proposals regarding U.S. withdrawal from Iraq, news outlets have gone out of their way to frame the Democratic differences over how soon to redeploy forces as politically favorable for the Republicans while not reporting that the Democrats&#x27; position is shared by a majority of Americans, that the war supported by Republicans is deeply unpopular with the American public, and that the GOP&#x27;s alternative plan appears to involve remaining in Iraq indefinitely.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200606210005</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 16:15:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Flawed &#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;/ABC News poll suggested no link between NSA data collection and warrantless spying -- despite &#x3C;em&#x3E;Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s own contrary report</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200605120005</link>
<description>A &#x3C;em&#x3E;Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;/ABC News poll on the National Security Agency program to collect phone call records of tens of millions of United States residents found that 63 percent of respondents found the program acceptable. The poll question claimed that the NSA is not &#x22;listening to or recording the conversations&#x22; captured by the data collection program, but a &#x3C;em&#x3E;Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article reported that the program is related to NSA&#x27;s warrantless domestic eavesdropping program.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200605120005</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 13:17:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>When criticizing the use of &#x22;selective facts,&#x22; The Note should have some facts of its own</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200603130012</link>
<description>ABCNews.com&#x27;s The Note criticized &#x3C;em&#x3E;New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; columnist Paul Krugman for using &#x22;selective facts&#x22; to say that John McCain &#x22;is not a maverick, a moderate, nor a straight talker.&#x22; However, The Note offered no facts to counter Krugman&#x27;s argument.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200603130012</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 16:20:47 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>ABC&#x27;s Gibson used polls renounced by ABC&#x27;s polling director to speculate that Bush might get a &#x22;pretty good size boost&#x22; in polls due to SOTU</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200602010005</link>
<description>ABC&#x27;s Charles Gibson said that President Bush may get a &#x22;pretty good size boost in his polls&#x22; after the State of the Union address, even though ABC News polling director Gary Langer had dismissed such polls as a highly unreliable indicator of the entire country&#x27;s view of the speech because those who listen or watch the speech, by and large, support the president already.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200602010005</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Feb 2006 13:00:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>