<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - The Path to 9/11</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/the_path_to_9_11</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: The Path to 9/11</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>Again ignoring numerous falsehoods, &#x3C;em&#x3E;NY Times &#x3C;/em&#x3E;falsely suggested that only Clinton administration officials objected to ABC&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;Path to 9/11&#x3C;/em&#x3E;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200805160006</link>
<description>A &#x3C;em&#x3E;New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article stated, &#x22;In 2006 ABC made changes to &#x27;The Path to 9/11&#x27; after complaints from former Clinton administration officials that it portrayed them as less than vigilant in their pursuit of Osama bin Laden.&#x22; But the article did not note that, despite editing, the final version of the ABC miniseries still included several fabricated scenes, falsehoods, and sharp discrepancies between its account of certain events and the findings laid out in the 9-11 Commission&#x27;s report.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200805160006</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 17:06:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;NY  Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;  noted  &#x3C;em&#x3E;Path&#x3C;/em&#x3E; producer&#x27;s claims about  stalled release of DVD, but not film&#x27;s numerous fabrications and  falsehoods</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200709070004</link>
<description>The &#x3C;em&#x3E;New York Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; asserted that 
&#x22;[t]he writer who penned the script for last year&#x27;s controversial ABC miniseries 
&#x27;The Path to 9/11&#x27; says pressure from powerful supporters of Bill and Hillary 
Clinton is delaying the mini&#x27;s DVD release.&#x22; But the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article failed to address the 
inaccuracies in the film and the sharp discrepancies between the film&#x27;s account 
of certain events and the findings laid out in the 9-11 Commission&#x27;s report, 
upon which ABC said the miniseries was based.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200709070004</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 Sep 2007 11:24:18 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;LA Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; notes Dem criticism of &#x3C;em&#x3E;Path to 9/11&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, but not its own review&#x27;s</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200709050009</link>
<description>A &#x3C;em&#x3E;Los Angeles Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article on the DVD release of ABC&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Path to 9/11&#x3C;/em&#x3E; reported that the original
miniseries &#x22;ignited a political firestorm,
almost entirely from high-profile Democratic leaders who viewed its account
... as a right-wing hatchet job,&#x22; overlooking factual inaccuracies in
the film and sharp discrepancies between the film&#x27;s account of certain
events and the findings laid out in the 9-11 Commission&#x27;s report, upon which ABC claimed
the miniseries was based. Those inaccuracies and discrepancies were pointed out in the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27; own review of &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Path to 9/11&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, which also noted the
film&#x27;s &#x22;partisan politics&#x22; and its &#x22;hopeless muddle of
the line between fact and &#x27;dramatization.&#x27; &#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200709050009</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 5 Sep 2007 16:42:49 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Hannity still defending deeply flawed &#x3C;em&#x3E;Path to 9/11&#x3C;/em&#x3E; miniseries -- &#x22;It did get it right&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200707020005</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200707020005</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 Jul 2007 17:43:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Hannity&#x27;s America&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Path to 9/11&#x3C;/em&#x3E; filmmaker defended scene he previously admitted was fabricated</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200701290009</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Path to 9/11 &#x3C;/em&#x3E;screenwriter
and producer Cyrus Nowrasteh asserted that the unedited version of a scene in his
film in which Clinton national security adviser Sandy Berger abandons an
opportunity to capture or kill Osama bin Laden is an accurate representation of
history. However, the scene depicts an event that did not happen, and Nowrasteh
himself has acknowledged
that the edited portion was fabricated.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200701290009</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 17:36:58 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>ABC program chief falsely claimed network &#x22;didn&#x27;t backpedal&#x22; on &#x3C;em&#x3E;Path to 9/11&#x3C;/em&#x3E;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200701160006</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200701160006</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 14:51:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>ABC VP presented with &#x22;Freedom of Expression Award&#x22; at right-wing film festival for her role in pushing &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Path to 9/11&#x3C;/em&#x3E;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200611160009</link>
<description>The Liberty Film Festival, &#x22;a forum for
conservative thought on film,&#x22; recently awarded ABC Vice President Judith
Tukich, a right-wing evangelical who has described her mission as
&#x22;evangeliz[ing] the world ... through the media,&#x22; the festival&#x27;s
&#x22;Freedom of Expression Award&#x22; for her role in assisting the
production and promotion of &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Path to 9/11&#x3C;/em&#x3E;.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200611160009</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 17:01:06 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Following ABC&#x27;s falsehood-ridden &#x3C;em&#x3E;Path to 9/11&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Coulter&#x27;s column repeated false claims about Pres. Clinton&#x27;s handling of terror threat</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200609160002</link>
<description>Two days after ABC aired the conclusion of its controversial two-part miniseries, &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Path to 9/11&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Ann Coulter repeated a number of falsehoods about the &#x22;docudrama&#x22; and President Clinton&#x27;s handling of terrorism, including alleging that the movie &#x22;relied on the 9/11 Commission Report&#x22;; that Clinton &#x22;refused the handover of [Osama] bin Laden&#x22;; and that &#x22;Islamic terrorists with suspected links to al-Qaeda and Saddam Hussein bombed the World Trade Center&#x22; in 1993.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200609160002</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 20:33:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fox anchors praised &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Path to 9/11&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, disregarded reasons for all the &#x22;controversy&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200609140001</link>
<description>During September 12 reports on ABC&#x27;s controversial miniseries &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Path to 9/11&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, not one Fox News anchor or correspondent examined the scenes from the film that contain documented falsehoods, explained &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox News Live&#x3C;/em&#x3E; co-host Bill Hemmer&#x27;s reference to Democrats&#x27; &#x22;paranoia&#x22; about the film&#x27;s depiction of former Clinton administration officials, or mentioned the fact that several prominent conservatives have also questioned the film&#x27;s accuracy.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200609140001</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 12:36:03 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Open letter from David Brock to ABC/Disney</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200609130009</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200609130009</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 15:10:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Part two of ABC&#x27;s 9-11 &#x22;docudrama&#x22; contained falsified scenes bolstering Bush</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200609130003</link>
<description>A &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters for America&#x3C;/em&#x3E; review of the conclusion of ABC&#x27;s two-part miniseries, &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Path to 9/11&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, contained scenes that were factually inaccurate, and that showed President Bush taking aggressive action there is no indication he ever took.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200609130003</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 21:03:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Providence Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E; issues correction to &#x22;incorrect[ ]&#x22; &#x3C;em&#x3E;Path to 9/11&#x3C;/em&#x3E; review</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200609120004</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200609120004</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 11:40:43 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Numerous reviews of ABC miniseries failed to note controversy surrounding its factual accuracy</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200609120002</link>
<description>Numerous newspapers ran positive reviews of the ABC miniseries &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Path to 9/11&#x3C;/em&#x3E; -- calling it &#x22;factual,&#x22; &#x22;meticulous,&#x22; and &#x22;completely true&#x22; -- failing to inform readers that it has been sharply criticized as inaccurate and even defamatory.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200609120002</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 21:32:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;WSJ&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Fund claimed Berger and Albright &#x22;persuaded ABC to alter scenes involving them&#x22; -- but central falsehoods remain</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200609120001</link>
<description>Columnist John Fund claimed that Sandy Berger and Madeleine Albright &#x22;persuaded ABC to alter the scenes involving them&#x22; in the miniseries &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Path to 9/11&#x3C;/em&#x3E;. But while the scenes were apparently edited from earlier versions, both still presented depictions contradicted by both Clinton officials and the 9-11 Commission report.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200609120001</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 21:10:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Reliable Sources&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Kurtz highlighted Medved&#x27;s criticism of Democrats to suggest &#x22;liberal hypocrisy&#x22; in response to &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Path to 9/11&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, ignored possibility of &#x22;hypocrisy&#x22; by Medved and other conservatives</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200609110007</link>
<description>On CNN&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;Reliable Sources&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, host Howard Kurtz suggested that &#x22;liberal hypocrisy&#x22; was inherent in Democrats&#x27; objections to ABC&#x27;s &#x22;docudrama&#x22; &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Path to 9/11&#x3C;/em&#x3E;. Kurtz highlighted radio host Michael Medved&#x27;s criticism of Democratic objections to the film and appeared to adopt Medved&#x27;s assertion that Democrats are seeking to &#x22;censor&#x22; the film. But Kurtz neglected to discuss the &#x22;hypocrisy&#x22; in the reaction to the film by some conservatives -- including Medved.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200609110007</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 17:05:32 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>