<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - The Washington Times</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/the_washington_times</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: The Washington Times</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; quoted Indiana man saying Obama is &#x22;a Muslim&#x22; without noting the assertion is false  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200805070001</link>
<description>A &#x3C;em&#x3E;Washington Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article uncritically quoted an Indiana man saying of Sen. Barack Obama, &#x22;I can&#x27;t stand him. ... He&#x27;s a Muslim. He&#x27;s not even pro-American as far as I&#x27;m concerned.&#x22; By contrast, after quoting the same man in its own article, the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Chicago Sun-Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; wrote that &#x22;Obama has never been a Muslim, but bogus e-mails accuse him of being a Muslim who put his hand on a copy of the Quran to be sworn into the U.S. Senate and refusing to say the Pledge of Allegiance.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200805070001</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 May 2008 11:42:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Post, WSJ&#x3C;/em&#x3E; editorial pages urged release of tax returns by Teresa Heinz Kerry, but have yet to call for Cindy McCain&#x27;s  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200805050001</link>
<description>In 2004, the editorial pages of &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; and &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Wall Street Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E; called on Teresa Heinz Kerry to release her tax returns. But both have yet to call on Sen. John McCain&#x27;s campaign to release Cindy McCain&#x27;s tax returns or even note that the campaign has refused to do so.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200805050001</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 May 2008 14:52:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; asserted McCain &#x22;doesn&#x27;t intend to make&#x22; Wright &#x22;a political issue,&#x22; but aides have reportedly distributed materials about Wright</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200804140005</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27; Andrea Billups wrote that Sen. John McCain&#x27;s &#x22;low profile during the Wright flap suggests he doesn&#x27;t intend to make it a political issue, even if others in his party do.&#x22; But Billups did not report that a McCain campaign aide reportedly distributed a video that &#x22;splices together the most inflammatory language of Jeremiah Wright with a series of other issues that have arisen in the campaign.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200804140005</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:40:42 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Reporting on Dems&#x27; &#x22;condemn[ation]&#x22; of McCain comment, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; left out McCain&#x27;s inconsistency  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200804080005</link>
<description>Reporting on Sen. John McCain&#x27;s speech about the Iraq war, &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; asserted that &#x22;Democrats have condemned Mr. McCain for his 100-year comment, though Mr. McCain was saying Iraq could become a nation like South Korea, where U.S. forces have been stationed for more than 50 years.&#x22; But the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; did not mention that McCain has been inconsistent on whether U.S. troop&#x27;s future presence in Iraq would be analogous to that in South   Korea.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200804080005</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 8 Apr 2008 15:50:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27; McCaslin misrepresented FEC spokesman, advisory opinions, to raise questions about Clinton&#x27;s Elton John concert  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200803270011</link>
<description>In a column about an Elton John concert on behalf of Sen. Hillary Clinton&#x27;s campaign, &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27; John McCaslin questioned whether the concert violates federal election law and wrote that FEC spokesman Bob Biersack &#x22;said he doesn&#x27;t know whether the Elton John performance would be considered unlawful by FEC standards.&#x22; While McCaslin later updated his column, he did not note that, according to the Clinton campaign, Biersack said: &#x22;I did not intend to convey ... that there is anything unlawful&#x22; about the concert. McCaslin also falsely asserted that a 1981 FEC advisory opinion &#x22;prohibited a foreign national artist from donating his services in connection with fundraising for a U.S. Senate campaign.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200803270011</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 20:35:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27; Lambro asserted McCain &#x22;burnish[ed] his defense and foreign policy credentials&#x22; on trip, ignored Al Qaeda-Iran gaffe  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200803250007</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27; Donald Lambro asserted that Sen. John McCain&#x27;s &#x22;fact-finding foreign policy trip&#x22; &#x22;burnish[ed] his defense and foreign policy credentials.&#x22; Lambro wrote this despite McCain&#x27;s admittedly false claim during the trip that &#x22;it&#x27;s common knowledge and has been reported in the media that ... Al Qaeda is going back into Iran and receiving training and are coming back into Iraq from Iran.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200803250007</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 16:14:18 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Despite reporting to the contrary, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; claimed Obama received &#x22;a discount&#x22; on his house  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200803030005</link>
<description>A &#x3C;em&#x3E;Washington Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article asserted that Sen. Barack Obama &#x22;received a discount for purchasing [his] home, and Mr. [Antoin] Rezko bought the lot next door.&#x22; The article did not cite any evidence that Obama &#x22;received a discount,&#x22; and Bloomberg News has reported that &#x22;[t]he couple who sold Barack Obama his Chicago home said the Illinois senator&#x27;s $1.65 million bid &#x27;was the best offer&#x27; and they didn&#x27;t cut their asking price because a campaign donor bought their adjacent land, according to e-mails between Obama&#x27;s presidential campaign and the seller.&#x22;    </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200803030005</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 3 Mar 2008 16:16:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; falsely claimed Obama &#x22;urg[ed] the Bush administration to conduct air strikes against terrorist targets in Pakistan without its approval&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802280014</link>
<description>A &#x3C;em&#x3E;Washington Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article distorted Sen. Barack Obama&#x27;s comments about targeting terrorists in Pakistan, falsely claiming that Obama &#x22;urg[ed] the Bush administration to conduct air strikes against terrorist targets in Pakistan without its approval.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802280014</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 19:25:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media advance myth of McCain as lobbyist foe  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802260009</link>
<description>Various media figures and reports have helped perpetuate the myth of Sen. John McCain as a straight-talking maverick who is feared by lobbyists and representatives of special interests. But McCain&#x27;s campaign reportedly has more current and former lobbyists on staff or as advisers and more current and former lobbyist fundraising bundlers than any other candidate.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802260009</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 18:59:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ignoring own reporting, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Times &#x3C;/em&#x3E;headline claimed &#x22;McCain refuses to pander&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802140007</link>
<description>A &#x3C;em&#x3E;Washington Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; headline claimed in reference to Sen. John McCain: &#x22;McCain refuses to pander.&#x22; In fact, &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; itself has reported on McCain&#x27;s efforts to satisfy conservative Republicans by changing his positions on issues such as taxes and immigration.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802140007</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:47:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; misrepresented photograph of Clinton from New Haven event  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802050012</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; misrepresented an Associated Press photograph, claiming that it showed Hillary Clinton &#x22;tear[ing] up during a stop in New Haven, Conn.&#x22; In fact, according to the caption provided by the AP, it depicted Clinton &#x22;wiping her eye and sipping water to get her cough under control&#x22;; it does not depict the moment at the New Haven event the accompanying &#x3C;em&#x3E;Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article highlighted.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802050012</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 Feb 2008 20:18:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash.  Times &#x3C;/em&#x3E;editorial cropped  Obama quote to falsely claim he argued against protecting &#x22;babies who survive  botched late-term abortions&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802050010</link>
<description>A &#x3C;em&#x3E;Washington Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; editorial falsely claimed  that Sen. Barack Obama  &#x22;argu[ed] cold-bloodedly on the Illinois Senate floor that babies who survive  botched late-term abortions should not be considered &#x27;persons&#x27; because this  would be tantamount to admitting &#x27;that they are persons that are entitled to the  kinds of protections that would be provided to a -- a child, a 9-month old --  child that was delivered to term.&#x27; &#x22; In fact, he was not discussing  &#x22;late-term abortions&#x22; in the remarks the editorial highlighted; Obama was asserting that the bill in  question, which was not limited to late-term abortions, would &#x22;essentially bar  abortions.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802050010</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 Feb 2008 17:20:48 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; runs column on Obama under the headline: &#x22;Black horse&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802050004</link>
<description>A &#x3C;em&#x3E;Washington Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; column reporting that Chris Matthews spoke about Sen. Barack Obama&#x27;s presidential candidacy and the &#x22;galloping horse of history&#x22; ran under the headline &#x22;Black horse.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802050004</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 Feb 2008 13:51:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Reporting &#x3C;em&#x3E;National Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s rating of Obama, media ignored magazine&#x27;s non-rating of McCain because of missed votes  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802050002</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters for America&#x3C;/em&#x3E; has identified numerous media outlets or figures who reported that the &#x3C;em&#x3E;National Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E; has rated Sen. Barack Obama &#x22;the most liberal senator in 2007,&#x22; but did not report that the same &#x3C;em&#x3E;National Journal &#x3C;/em&#x3E;feature stated that Sen. John McCain &#x22;did not vote frequently enough in 2007 to draw a composite score. He missed more than half of the votes in both the economic and foreign-policy categories.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802050002</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 Feb 2008 12:46:58 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; left out Obama statements that undermine its claim that &#x22;Obama &#x27;04 at Odds with Obama &#x27;08&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802010011</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; claimed that during his 2004 Senate campaign, Barack Obama &#x22;took positions&#x22; on health care for undocumented immigrants, mandatory minimum sentences, and single-payer health insurance &#x22;that conflict with statements that he has made during his run for the White House.&#x22; But the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; omitted key parts of Obama&#x27;s statements on these issues, the inclusion of which would have undermined its characterization of Obama as having changed his positions.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802010011</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 1 Feb 2008 19:56:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>