<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Time Magazine</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/time_magazine</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Time Magazine</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Time&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Carney is latest media figure to cite &#x3C;em&#x3E;National Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E; ranking of Obama without noting rankings&#x27; subjectivity  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806300003</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Time&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s James Carney wrote: &#x22;As any Republican will tell you, the &#x3C;em&#x3E;National Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E; ranked [Sen. Barack] Obama the most liberal member of the Senate.&#x22; But Carney did not note that the &#x3C;em&#x3E;National Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s rankings are based on subjective criteria.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200806300003</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 16:01:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Time&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Halperin printed Boehner&#x27;s accusation against Obama without providing context showing it was false  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200805130005</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;&#x3C;em&#x3E;Time&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Mark Halperin reported on his blog that House Minority Leader John Boehner &#x22;use[d]&#x22; Sen. Barack Obama&#x27;s interview with &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Atlantic&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Jeffrey Goldberg to &#x22;accuse Obama of calling Israel a &#x27;constant sore.&#x27; &#x22; Halperin reported that the Obama campaign called Boehner&#x27;s comments &#x22;a dishonest and ridiculous distortion&#x22; but did not note that the Obama campaign was right or provide the context for Obama&#x27;s comment.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200805130005</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 15:04:15 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Time&#x3C;/em&#x3E; cited Mitchell in purporting to examine Clinton&#x27;s role in Northern Ireland peace process, but not Mitchell&#x27;s affirmation of Clinton&#x27;s statements  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200803130007</link>
<description>A &#x3C;em&#x3E;Time&#x3C;/em&#x3E; magazine article claimed that &#x22;several diplomatic sources&#x22; who worked on the Northern Ireland peace talks &#x22;say that the women&#x27;s groups&#x22; with whom Hillary Clinton engaged during the process &#x22;were not nearly as pivotal to the process as Hillary&#x27;s backers maintain&#x22; and that former Sen. George Mitchell was &#x22;much more involved in those efforts.&#x22; But the article failed to mention that Mitchell has said that Clinton&#x27;s statements regarding her role in the peace process &#x22;are generally accurate to the extent that they have been relayed to me.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200803130007</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 18:41:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Joe Klein falsely suggested Obama&#x27;s focus on patriotism is new  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200803070003</link>
<description>In his &#x3C;em&#x3E;Time&#x3C;/em&#x3E; column, Joe Klein claimed that Sen. Barack Obama is aware of the &#x22;potential problem&#x22; of his &#x22;patriotism,&#x22; as &#x22;patriotism replaced hope as a theme of his [March 4] concession speech [in Texas].&#x22; As evidence, Klein wrote that Obama &#x22;echoed John McCain in citing Abraham Lincoln, and called America &#x27;the last best hope on Earth.&#x27; &#x22; Klein then falsely claimed: &#x22;That was the only &#x27;hope&#x27; he mentioned -- a fascinating calibration.&#x22; In fact, Obama mentioned &#x22;hope&#x22; at other points in the speech, and he has repeatedly used Lincoln&#x27;s &#x22;the last best hope on Earth&#x22; line during his presidential campaign.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200803070003</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 Mar 2008 13:48:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Time&#x27;s&#x3C;/em&#x3E; Jay Newton-Small asked about &#x22;concerns&#x22; that &#x22;the Clintons might yet again burn down the Democratic Party&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200803060006</link>
<description>During an Obama campaign conference call, a recording of which was posted on &#x3C;em&#x3E;Time&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Swampland, Jay Newton-Small stated: &#x22;I just wanted to ask about your pitch to superdelegates these days and if that&#x27;s changed at all. I mean, are you talking to them at all about the concerns that the Clintons might yet again burn down the Democratic Party?&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200803060006</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 6 Mar 2008 14:24:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Time&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Scherer ignored McCain flip-flops on immigration and taxes, did not note his &#x22;remarkably vague&#x22; plan for Iraq  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802250007</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Time&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Michael Scherer wrote that Sen. John McCain has &#x22;a set of issues that appeal to the political center,&#x22; including immigration and President Bush&#x27;s tax cuts, but did not note that McCain has reversed his position on immigration and his rationale for opposing the tax cuts. Scherer also asserted without explanation that the Democratic presidential candidates have been &#x22;remarkably vague&#x22; about &#x22;what to do next&#x22; concerning the war in Iraq, but did not mention that McCain has been vague about how long he believes U.S. forces should remain in Iraq, the number of troops that will be stationed in Iraq for the next 10 or 20 years, and whether the United States will have permanent bases there and a security agreement like it does with Japan and South Korea.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802250007</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 19:15:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;&#x3C;em&#x3E;Time&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Gibbs repeated falsehood that Bill Clinton referred to Obama&#x27;s candidacy as a &#x22;fairy tale&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200801260002</link>
<description>In a &#x3C;em&#x3E;Time&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article, Nancy Gibbs wrote that Bill Clinton &#x22;hacked away at the &#x27;fairy tale&#x27; that is [Barack] Obama&#x27;s candidacy.&#x22; In fact, Clinton did not refer to Obama or his campaign as a &#x22;fairy tale&#x22;; rather, as &#x3C;em&#x3E;New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; reporter Mark Leibovich wrote, Clinton &#x22;was referring specifically to the perception that Mr. Obama was totally pure in his opposition to the Iraq war.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200801260002</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:40:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>From  cleavage to &#x22;cackle&#x22;? Media find new focus in coverage of Hillary  Clinton</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200710040003</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200710040003</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Oct 2007 21:29:04 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Time&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Klein falsely asserted Clinton &#x22;had to return&#x22; $850,000 in contributions &#x22;to the skeevy Norman Hsu&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200709230001</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200709230001</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 13:55:10 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>MoveOn.org  and the media mess</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200709180005</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200709180005</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 12:31:46 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media failed to  resolve question  of  which  members  of  Congress  Freedom&#x27;s  Watch  ads  are  targeting</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708240012</link>
<description>In reports on a recent advertisement buy by Freedom&#x27;s Watch in support of the Iraq 
war, media reports have 
failed to resolve the question of which members of Congress the ad buys are 
targeting, despite the apparent newsworthiness of the issue. For instance, 
&#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; suggested that the ad 
campaign 
is 
an 
attack 
on 
Democrats, 
a 
suggestion repeated 
by 
&#x3C;em&#x3E;Time&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Karen Tumulty; other reports have not even mentioned the issue; while still others have asserted that the ads target both Democrats and Republicans. However, according to analyses by war opponents, the buys 
target mainly Republicans, a charge Freedom&#x27;s Watch called &#x22;propaganda by our 
enemies.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708240012</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 19:51:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The media misses  Mitt Romney&#x27;s YouTube moment</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708130007</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708130007</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:43:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Libby, Bush and the lapdog press</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200707100007</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200707100007</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 15:18:42 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>In &#x3C;em&#x3E;Time&#x3C;/em&#x3E;,&#x3C;em&#x3E; &#x3C;/em&#x3E;Rupert Murdoch claimed to &#x22;play it absolutely straight&#x22; like &#x22;Brit Hume and his team on the nightly news&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200706290009</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200706290009</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 19:09:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Klein wrote of Paul&#x27;s &#x22;singular moment of weirdness&#x22; at debate, but 9-11 report supports his claim&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200705190001</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200705190001</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 20:01:11 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>