<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Torture</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/torture</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Torture</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>Blitzer  cited &#x22;this notion that the Democrats are weak when it comes to national  security&#x22; -- not according to polling</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200711020013</link>
<description>In response to Cybercast News Service editor-in-chief Terry Jeffrey&#x27;s statement 
that &#x22;[i]f the Democrats in the Senate want to ban the procedure by which we got 
vital information out of Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, Harry Reid ought to put up a 
bill right now that says: &#x27;Waterboarding is forbidden. What we did to Khalid 
Shaikh Mohammed may not be done again.&#x27; &#x22; CNN&#x27;s Wolf Blitzer replied: &#x22;It sort 
of reinforces this notion that the Democrats are weak when it comes to national 
security. That&#x27;s been a very successful strategy for the Republicans for decades 
now.&#x22; In fact, polling shows that the public is split on which party is better 
on handling terrorism, with some polls showing Democrats with a slight lead.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200711020013</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Nov 2007 18:51:10 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>AP  falsely reported that Mukasey &#x22;pledged to study&#x22; legality of waterboarding</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200711020011</link>
<description>An Associated Press report claimed that, in an October 30 
letter to Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee, attorney general 
nominee Michael Mukasey &#x22;pledged 
to 
study,&#x22; if 
confirmed, the legality of the 
interrogation technique known as waterboarding. However, if news 
reports that the government stopped the use of waterboarding in 2005 are 
correct, then Mukasey&#x27;s promise appears not to cover waterboarding, because 
Mukasey said in his letter that he would &#x22;review any coercive interrogation 
techniques &#x3C;em&#x3E;currently&#x3C;/em&#x3E; used by the 
United States Government and the legal analysis authorizing their use to assess 
whether such techniques comply with the law&#x22; [emphasis added].</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200711020011</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Nov 2007 17:23:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On  CNN, West asserted waterboarding is &#x22;not torture,&#x22; claimed, &#x22;[Y]ou wake up  feeling fine the next day&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200711020009</link>
<description>On CNN, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Washington Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; 
columnist Diana West said: &#x22;What I would like to see is people really start 
thinking about what is torture. If putting people into human-size shredders, as 
Saddam Hussein did, is torture, then waterboarding, which my senior military 
sources tell me you wake up feeling fine the next day -- it is not torture.&#x22; 
However, in congressional testimony, Allen S. Keller, M.D., director of the 
Bellevue Hospital Center/New York University Program for Survivors of Torture, 
stated, &#x22;To think that abusive methods, including the enhanced interrogation 
techniques [in which Keller included waterboarding], are harmless psychological 
ploys is contradictory to well established medical knowledge and clinical 
experience.&#x22; Keller stated of waterboarding specifically, &#x22;Long term effects 
include panic attacks, depression and PTSD,&#x22; and said it poses a &#x22;real risk of 
death.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200711020009</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Nov 2007 16:57:34 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Olbermann  named Kondracke &#x22;Worst Person&#x22; &#x22;winner&#x22; for waterboarding comments; Gibson  &#x22;runner-up&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200711010011</link>
<description>MSNBC&#x27;s Keith Olbermann named &#x3C;em&#x3E;Roll 
Call&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Mort Kondracke the &#x22;winner&#x22; of his nightly &#x22;Worst Person 
in the World&#x22; segment for asserting on Fox News&#x27; &#x3C;em&#x3E;Special Report&#x3C;/em&#x3E;: &#x22;I&#x27;m sure [waterboarding] feels like torture, 
you know, it doesn&#x27;t result in any lasting damage, but it feels like torture.&#x22; 
Olbermann also named Fox News&#x27; John Gibson the &#x22;runner-up&#x22; for criticizing an 
&#x22;NBC news anchor&#x22; for offering Sen. Barack Obama advice on what he &#x22;needs to 
say&#x22; about Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton -- one day after Gibson himself had 
offered Obama advice.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200711010011</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Nov 2007 15:29:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Kondracke:  Waterboarding &#x22;doesn&#x27;t result in any lasting  damage&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200710310004</link>
<description>In a Fox News &#x22;All-Star&#x22; panel discussion, Morton Kondracke said of the 
interrogation technique known as waterboarding, &#x22;I&#x27;m sure it feels like torture, 
you know, it doesn&#x27;t result in any lasting damage, but it feels like torture.&#x22; 
But a physician who heads a 
program for torture survivors told a Senate 
committee that techniques such as waterboarding &#x22;are intended to break the 
prisoners down, to terrify them and cause harm to their psyche, and in so doing 
result in lasting harmful health consequences.&#x22; 
He also said: &#x22;There is a real risk of death from actually drowning or suffering 
a heart attack or damage to the lungs.&#x22;

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200710310004</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 12:16:20 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash.  Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s  Kornblut misrepresented earlier mischaracterization of Clinton torture  comments</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200710120007</link>
<description>Responding to a reader&#x27;s question 
about an article she co-wrote, &#x3C;em&#x3E;The 
Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Anne E. Kornblut stated, &#x22;We asked Sen. [Hillary 
Rodham] Clinton 
what she would do, upon taking office, about special interrogation methods ... 
such as waterboarding or sexual humiliation. ... And her response was simply that 
she opposes torture, which of course is also the current policy.&#x22; But according 
to a transcript of the 
interview, Clinton was not 
specifically asked about &#x22;waterboarding or sexual humiliation,&#x22; and she did not 
refuse to say whether she would prohibit such measures. Indeed, she said that she 
would &#x22;draw a bright line and say &#x27;No torture,&#x27; &#x22; and that she would 
&#x22;abide by the Geneva conventions, [and] 
abide by the laws we 
have passed.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200710120007</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 15:31:34 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Kornblut  still struggling with Clinton quotes?</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200710110001</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;The&#x3C;/em&#x3E; &#x3C;em&#x3E;Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Anne E. Kornblut and Dan 
Balz reported that Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton was &#x22;vague about how she would 
handle special interrogation methods used by the CIA.&#x22; Adding, &#x22;She said that 
while she does not condone torture, so much has been kept secret that she would 
not know unless elected what other extreme measures interrogators are using, and 
therefore could not say whether she would change or continue existing policies.&#x22; 
But blogger Greg Sargent later reported that Kornblut and Balz omitted from 
their article Clinton&#x27;s statement that &#x22;I think 
we have to draw a bright line and say &#x27;No torture -- abide by the Geneva conventions, abide 
by the laws we have passed,&#x27; and then try to make sure we implement that.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200710110001</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:14:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Krauthammer&#x27;s  claims about Bush&#x27;s &#x22;steely&#x22; resolve against Al Qaeda conflict with reported  facts</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200709120009</link>
<description>Among the reasons cited by Charles Krauthammer that Al Qaeda has not and 
cannot 
&#x22;hit us&#x22; is because the 
Bush administration has waged an &#x22;incredibly effective war in Afghanistan&#x22; that 
he said has &#x22;expelled Al Qaeda and scattered it, and has kept it off-balance for 
six years now.&#x22; In fact, the July 2007 National Intelligence Estimate concluded 
that Al Qaeda &#x22;has protected or regenerated key elements of its Homeland attack 
capability&#x22; including a &#x22;safehaven&#x22; in Pakistan. Krauthammer also credited 
&#x22;secret prisons and the interrogation which yielded and interrogated people like 
Khalid Shaikh Mohammed&#x22;; but even supporters of 
the CIA&#x27;s interrogation and detention program reportedly acknowledge that much 
of the information that coercion produces, including information gathered from 
Mohammed, is unreliable.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200709120009</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 19:49:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>NBC&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;Nightly News&#x3C;/em&#x3E; only network news broadcast not to report Council of Europe&#x27;s CIA secret prison claims</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200706110007</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200706110007</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 17:47:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Conservatives continue to use Fox&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;24&#x3C;/em&#x3E; to support hawkish policies</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200702020015</link>
<description>Cal Thomas is the latest
conservative figure to use the TV show &#x3C;em&#x3E;24&#x3C;/em&#x3E;
to forecast a nuclear attack on the United States. Conservatives have also
looked to the TV series for justification of aggressive interrogation
procedures.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200702020015</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Feb 2007 16:10:34 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN uncritically reported Gonzales&#x27; defense of sending suspect to country that tortured him</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200701190016</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200701190016</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 18:19:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fox News correspondent on his on-air &#x22;waterboarding&#x22;: &#x22;a pretty efficient mechanism to get someone to talk and then still have them alive and healthy within minutes&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200611060004</link>
<description>Fox News&#x27; Steve Harrigan underwent what he
described as three &#x22;phase[s]&#x22; of the controversial interrogation
technique known as &#x22;waterboarding,&#x22; on camera, concluding that the
technique is &#x22;a pretty efficient mechanism to get someone to talk and
then still have them alive and healthy within minutes.&#x22; Psychologists
have asserted that &#x22;such forms of near-asphyxiation&#x22; can lead to
long-term psychological damage.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200611060004</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 6 Nov 2006 14:44:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s &#x22;Broken Government&#x22; special on executive power filled with broken claims of its own</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200610300006</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200610300006</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 16:21:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Blitzer described Senate passage of detainee bill as a &#x22;critical victory for President Bush in the war on terror&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200609290002</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200609290002</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 12:29:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media failed to contrast Frist claim that &#x22;no responsible person&#x22; would outline impermissible interrogation techniques with McCain&#x27;s statement doing just that</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200609250008</link>
<description>A &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E; review of major media outlets found that only &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; highlighted the major differences between remarks by Republican Sens. John McCain and Bill Frist on separate Sunday morning news shows on August 24. While McCain stated that &#x22;waterboarding and other extreme measures such as extreme deprivation -- sleep deprivation, hypothermia, and others&#x22; could be illegal under new rules for U.S. interrogations of terrorism suspects, Frist asserted that &#x22;no responsible person&#x22; is going to &#x22;comment on individual techniques&#x22; that would or would not be permitted under the new law, because doing so &#x22;helps the terrorists.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200609250008</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 18:20:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>