<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Tucker</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/tucker</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Tucker</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>   Media asserted that McCain flew coach in 2007, without noting expenditure records showing payments for use of wife&#x27;s jet  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200804280006</link>
<description>Despite the availability of expenditure reports showing that Sen. John McCain&#x27;s campaign used a corporate jet owned by his wife&#x27;s company over a seven-month period beginning in the summer of 2007, several members of the media asserted earlier this year that McCain flew coach when the campaign was low on funds.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200804280006</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 17:59:32 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x22;Offended&#x22; Buchanan stands up for &#x22;white males,&#x22; claiming only &#x22;white males&#x22; died at Gettysburg, Normandy  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802290021</link>
<description>After MSNBC&#x27;s Tucker Carlson noted that Howard Dean reportedly said that the Democratic presidential field &#x22;looks like America,&#x22; while the Republican field, made up of white males, &#x22;looks like the 1950s and talks like the 1850s,&#x22; Pat Buchanan reported being &#x22;offended&#x22; by Dean&#x27;s remarks and said: &#x22;[W]hat did white males do? OK, they were the only guys signing the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence, all the dead at Gettysburg, all the dead at Normandy.&#x22; In fact, &#x22;nearly 2,000&#x22; African-Americans took part in the Normandy invasion, at least some of whom apparently died as a result, and at least one woman and one African-American were reportedly killed in the the Gettysburg campaign.     </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802290021</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 21:46:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Carlson asserted Clinton&#x27;s court-appointed representation of rape suspect was &#x22;immoral&#x22; -- but legal experts say she was doing her job  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802250012</link>
<description>Referring to a &#x3C;em&#x3E;Newsday&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article about Hillary Clinton&#x27;s representation of a man accused of raping a 12-year-old girl, Tucker Carlson said on his MSNBC program: &#x22;Now their defense is, &#x27;Well, that&#x27;s what lawyers are supposed to do.&#x27; In other words, it&#x27;s legal, therefore it&#x27;s allowed. I guess my response would be, it&#x27;s still repulsive and immoral.&#x22; In fact, the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Newsday&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article made clear that legal experts agreed that Clinton was simply fulfilling her legal and ethical obligation as the defendant&#x27;s lawyer, a job she was reportedly assigned by the court.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802250012</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 20:55:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Tucker Carlson echoed Kaus, VDARE contributor on Michelle Obama: &#x22;I think she&#x27;s got a chip on her shoulder&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802210006</link>
<description>Discussing recent comments by Michelle Obama, Tucker Carlson said&#x3C;em&#x3E;:&#x3C;/em&#x3E; &#x22;I have thought from Day One that Michelle Obama, impressive as she is, clearly intelligent, very handsome, self-possessed -- I think that she&#x27;s got a chip on her shoulder.&#x22; Similarly, Slate.com blogger Mickey Kaus wrote of Michelle Obama: &#x22;For whatever reason, she sure seems to have a non-trivial chip on her shoulder and it&#x27;s not a winning quality.&#x22; Additionally, referring to a February 16 &#x3C;em&#x3E;Newsweek &#x3C;/em&#x3E;profile, VDARE.com contributor Steve Sailer wrote that Michelle Obama &#x22;sounds like she&#x27;s got a log-sized chip on her shoulder from lucking into Princeton due to affirmative action.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802210006</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:21:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Days after &#x3C;em&#x3E;Today &#x3C;/em&#x3E;apology for Fonda comment, MSNBC hosted Roger Stone of anti-Clinton group Citizens United Not Timid  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802200009</link>
<description>Just days after NBC apologized for the use of the word &#x22;cunt&#x22; on &#x3C;em&#x3E;Today&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Republican consultant Roger Stone, who recently established the anti-Hillary Clinton group Citizens United Not Timid -- which emphasizes its acronym on its website and on T-shirts by bolding the first letter in each word of its name and purports to &#x22;educate the American public about what Hillary Clinton really is&#x22; -- appeared on MSNBC&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;Tucker&#x3C;/em&#x3E;.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802200009</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 19:41:22 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>  MSNBC&#x27;s Shuster falsely claimed he said &#x22;Americans should be proud of&#x22; Chelsea Clinton before his &#x22;pimped out&#x22; comment  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802080003</link>
<description>Addressing a remark he made about Chelsea Clinton&#x27;s work on her mother&#x27;s campaign -- &#x22;doesn&#x27;t it seem like Chelsea&#x27;s sort of being pimped out in some weird sort of way&#x22; -- MSNBC&#x27;s David Shuster stated that &#x22;last night, I used a phrase -- some slang about her efforts. ... [T]o the extent that people feel I was being pejorative, I apologize for that. I should have seen that people might view it that way, and for that, then I&#x27;m sorry.&#x22; However, Shuster never mentioned the specific &#x22;slang&#x22; he used in reference to Chelsea Clinton&#x27;s campaign work, and he falsely claimed that, during the same segment in which he referred to her &#x22;being pimped out,&#x22; he said &#x22;Americans should be proud of [Chelsea]&#x22; and that &#x22;everybody, all of us, love&#x22; her.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802080003</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 8 Feb 2008 14:20:25 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Carlson  -- who has said Obama &#x22;seems like kind of a wuss&#x22; and &#x22;sounds like a pothead&#x22; --  now claims he &#x22;give[s]  the guy a pass at every turn&#x22;    </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200801290014</link>
<description>Discussing what he described as &#x22;slavish&#x22; and &#x22;slobbering&#x22; media coverage of  Sen. Barack Obama, Tucker Carlson stated: &#x22;And I will freely confess that I am  absolutely part of the problem. I give the guy a pass at every turn and I&#x27;m nice  to him even though I disagree with him.&#x22; In fact, over the past year, Carlson  has leveled personal attacks against Obama and spread misinformation about him.  &#x3C;br /&#x3E;
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200801290014</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 18:47:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>MSNBC&#x27;s Carlson  mocked Clinton  for her comments about gender discrimination  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200801230007</link>
<description>After airing a video clip of Sen. Hillary Clinton talking about &#x22;gender  equality&#x22; during a Democratic presidential candidates debate, MSNBC host Tucker  Carlson stated: &#x22;It takes a lot of guts for a rich, privileged white lady who is  one of the most powerful people in the world to claim that she is a victim of  gender discrimination.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200801230007</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:08:09 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Imus  and Carlson invoke Chavez to smear Dem presidential candidates    </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200801220009</link>
<description>While discussing Hillary Clinton with fellow  radio host Jay Severin, Don Imus  asked, &#x22;Well, why do we think that we -- I mean, why don&#x27;t we just select  [Venezuelan President] Hugo Chavez, then, if we want some rabid nut? I mean, why  do we think that that&#x27;s a face we want to put on America?&#x22;  Severin answered: &#x22;I think you&#x27;ve got that, that&#x27;s pretty much it. With Hillary  Clinton you&#x27;ve got Hugo Chavez in a dress, and about the same size.&#x22; Separately,  discussing John Edwards&#x27; performance in the Nevada caucus, MSNBC&#x27;s Tucker Carlson  asserted, &#x22;It turns out that Hugo Chavez and his ideas are still not that  popular in this country, liberal as it&#x27;s become. That&#x27;s the lesson I take away.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200801220009</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:39:04 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Carlson:  &#x22;many black churches are basically political  organizations&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200801150019</link>
<description>On the January 14 edition of MSNBC&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;Tucker&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, while discussing Sen. Barack Obama&#x27;s speech at the Pentecostal Temple Church of God and Christ in Las Vegas, host Tucker Carlson asserted that &#x22;many black churches are basically political organizations.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200801150019</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:39:04 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>MSNBC&#x27;s O&#x27;Donnell  claimed Penn &#x22;on his own brought up cocaine&#x22; -- but Matthews started  conversation</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200712140011</link>
<description>On the December 13 edition of &#x3C;em&#x3E;Tucker&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Norah O&#x27;Donnell asserted that  during the same day&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;Hardball&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Clinton adviser Mark  Penn &#x22;once again brought up cocaine -- twice&#x22; in relation to Sen. Barack Obama  and later claimed that Penn &#x22;on his own brought up cocaine.&#x22; In fact, the entire &#x3C;em&#x3E;Hardball&#x3C;/em&#x3E; segment was devoted to controversial remarks regarding Obama&#x27;s  past drug use made by Clinton&#x27;s campaign co-chair, who  later resigned. Chris Matthews explicitly  asked Penn at least three distinct questions about the topic, and Penn had  offered at least two specific responses before he used the word  &#x22;cocaine.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200712140011</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 18:55:46 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Citing &#x22;Clintonian answer,&#x22; Carlson found another reason to call Obama &#x22;a wuss&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200711290001</link>
<description>MSNBC&#x27;s Tucker Carlson called Sen. Barack
Obama a &#x22;wuss&#x22; and a &#x22;BS artist,&#x22; citing
Obama&#x27;s response to the question,
&#x22;What does the word &#x27;Clintonian&#x27; mean to you?&#x22; during a recent ABC News interview. Carlson asserted that
&#x22;[h]e should just [have] come out and sa[id], &#x27;Yeah, [Sen. Hillary
Clinton is] Clintonian.&#x27; ... &#x27;That&#x27;s why they call it
Clintonian.&#x27; &#x22; He later claimed that people &#x22;who plan to vote
for her know that she is Clintonian in her answers. I mean, that&#x27;s seen
as a good thing a lot of the time. Why doesn&#x27;t Barack Obama have the
gumption, the moxie, the toughness?&#x22;

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200711290001</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 19:37:46 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>MSNBC&#x27;s  Carlson &#x22;outraged&#x22; by discussion of Giuliani&#x27;s marriages -- but not the  Clintons&#x27;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200710240003</link>
<description>Tucker Carlson said he was &#x22;outraged&#x22; by a statement from Rep. 
Charlie 
Rangel critical of 
Rudy Giuliani&#x27;s &#x22;personal life,&#x22; adding, &#x22;I don&#x27;t think you should attack 
Giuliani for philandering.&#x22; But Carlson has previously asserted that Sen. 
Hillary Clinton&#x27;s marriage to former President Bill Clinton is &#x22;[o]f course&#x22; an 
issue in the 2008 presidential election, discussing the Clintons&#x27; marriage in TV 
appearances, with 
references to Bill 
Clinton&#x27;s &#x22;philander[ing]&#x22; and 
&#x22;famous appetites.&#x22;

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200710240003</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:49:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Carlson: Obama campaign&#x27;s targeting of young voters has &#x22;a Khmer Rouge quality to it&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200710110003</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Tucker&#x3C;/em&#x3E;,
discussing the targeting of 17-year-old Iowa
voters by Sen. Barack Obama&#x27;s presidential campaign, Tucker Carlson said
the practice has &#x22;a Khmer Rouge quality to it,&#x22; adding,
&#x22;[I]t&#x27;s scary.&#x22; He also stated, &#x22;[I]f a right-wing
candidate came and targeted my kids, I&#x27;d be mad about it. I don&#x27;t
want my kids near political candidates. ... They&#x27;re creepy.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200710110003</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:37:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>MSNBC  asks about &#x22;GOP hypocrisy?&#x22; in denunciations of MoveOn but silence on Limbaugh&#x27;s  &#x22;Senator Betrayus&#x22; comments</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200709250003</link>
<description>While discussing what he suggested might be &#x22;hypocrisy when it comes to 
political attacks&#x22; with regard to a MoveOn.org ad headlined &#x22;General Petraeus or 
General Betray Us?&#x22; and comments by Rush Limbaugh about &#x22;Senator Betrayus, new 
name for Senator Hagel,&#x22; MSNBC&#x27;s David Shuster asked Rep. Marsha Blackburn, 
&#x22;Where was the outrage when Rush Limbaugh said this about Republican Senator 
Chuck Hagel over one of the senator&#x27;s stances on Iraq?&#x22;

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200709250003</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 12:51:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>