<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Tucker Carlson</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/tucker_carlson</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Tucker Carlson</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Morning Joe&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Carlson compared Clinton to a &#x22;cat in a box&#x22; and a &#x22;drunk party guest&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200805270001</link>
<description>On MSNBC&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;Morning Joe&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Tucker Carlson said of Sen. Hillary Clinton, &#x22;Look, she&#x27;s a trapped animal, there&#x27;s absolutely no question about it. As I&#x27;ve thought to myself many times, if you&#x27;ve ever tried to get your cat in a box, you know what Hillary Clinton is doing right now.&#x22; Carlson then imitated a screeching cat, and added, &#x22;with all four paws out, all the hair standing up? Look, she is in feral mode.&#x22; Later in the segment, Mika Brzezinski referred to Clinton as &#x22;the cat in a box, as Tucker so aptly put it.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200805270001</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 12:09:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>MSNBC anchor, guests ignore Obama&#x27;s prior condemnation of anti-Israel statements in church newsletter and by his pastor  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200803270010</link>
<description>On MSNBC, Tucker Carlson described statements on the &#x22;pastor&#x27;s pages&#x22; section of Sen. Barack Obama&#x27;s church&#x27;s newsletter as &#x22;wild,&#x22; &#x22;anti-Israeli statements&#x22; and asserted: &#x22;I think Obama will feel the need to address that directly fairly soon.&#x22; Later, Andrea Mitchell asked &#x3C;em&#x3E;Chicago Sun-Times &#x3C;/em&#x3E;Washington bureau chief Lynn Sweet: &#x22;Does he [Obama] have to do more explaining? Does he have to meet perhaps once again with Jewish leaders to try to reassure them that these are not his views as well?&#x22; Sweet responded: &#x22;Andrea, yes, yes, yes, and yes on everything you&#x27;re saying.&#x22; But no one mentioned Obama&#x27;s prior condemnation of his pastor&#x27;s &#x22;views on Israel&#x22; and the church&#x27;s republication of an op-ed by a Hamas official.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200803270010</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 19:31:02 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;USA Today&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Page on McCain&#x27;s Al Qaeda-Iran falsehood: &#x22;[M]ost Americans can&#x27;t tell you the difference between Sunnis and Shiites, either&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200803210007</link>
<description> On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Hardball&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, &#x3C;em&#x3E;USA Today&#x3C;/em&#x3E; Washington bureau chief Susan Page asserted of John McCain&#x27;s admittedly false claim that &#x22;[i]t&#x27;s common knowledge and has been reported in the media that Al Qaeda is going back into Iran and is receiving training and are coming back into Iraq from Iran&#x22;: &#x22;I think it&#x27;s a verbal error. And, you know, most Americans can&#x27;t tell you the difference between Sunnis and Shiites, either.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200803210007</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 16:00:58 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Scarborough claimed Clinton used &#x22;code language&#x22; when saying &#x22;no matter where you worship or the color of your skin ... we are all equal in the voting booth&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200803200003</link>
<description>MSNBC&#x27;s Joe Scarborough claimed that when Hillary Clinton said, &#x22;[N]o matter where you were born, or how much money you are born into, no matter where you worship, or the color of your skin, it is a bedrock American principle that we are all equal in the voting booth,&#x22; she was using &#x22;code language.&#x22; Scarborough made the &#x22;code&#x22; claim two more times on &#x3C;em&#x3E;Morning Joe&#x3C;/em&#x3E;.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200803200003</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 15:27:20 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Carlson asserted Clinton&#x27;s court-appointed representation of rape suspect was &#x22;immoral&#x22; -- but legal experts say she was doing her job  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802250012</link>
<description>Referring to a &#x3C;em&#x3E;Newsday&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article about Hillary Clinton&#x27;s representation of a man accused of raping a 12-year-old girl, Tucker Carlson said on his MSNBC program: &#x22;Now their defense is, &#x27;Well, that&#x27;s what lawyers are supposed to do.&#x27; In other words, it&#x27;s legal, therefore it&#x27;s allowed. I guess my response would be, it&#x27;s still repulsive and immoral.&#x22; In fact, the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Newsday&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article made clear that legal experts agreed that Clinton was simply fulfilling her legal and ethical obligation as the defendant&#x27;s lawyer, a job she was reportedly assigned by the court.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802250012</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 20:55:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Tucker Carlson echoed Kaus, VDARE contributor on Michelle Obama: &#x22;I think she&#x27;s got a chip on her shoulder&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802210006</link>
<description>Discussing recent comments by Michelle Obama, Tucker Carlson said&#x3C;em&#x3E;:&#x3C;/em&#x3E; &#x22;I have thought from Day One that Michelle Obama, impressive as she is, clearly intelligent, very handsome, self-possessed -- I think that she&#x27;s got a chip on her shoulder.&#x22; Similarly, Slate.com blogger Mickey Kaus wrote of Michelle Obama: &#x22;For whatever reason, she sure seems to have a non-trivial chip on her shoulder and it&#x27;s not a winning quality.&#x22; Additionally, referring to a February 16 &#x3C;em&#x3E;Newsweek &#x3C;/em&#x3E;profile, VDARE.com contributor Steve Sailer wrote that Michelle Obama &#x22;sounds like she&#x27;s got a log-sized chip on her shoulder from lucking into Princeton due to affirmative action.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802210006</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:21:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Carlson  falsely claimed Giustra  allowed Clinton  personally to &#x22;get rich&#x22;   </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802010002</link>
<description>Discussing a &#x3C;em&#x3E;&#x3C;em&#x3E;New York  Times &#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x3C;/em&#x3E;article reporting on a trip by former President  Bill Clinton to Kazakhstan with Canadian mining  financier Frank Giustra, Tucker Carlson stated: &#x22;Bill Clinton, the former  president, out there, contravening official American foreign policy on behalf of  some anti-democratic dictator so his buddy can get rich and he can get rich as a  result? It&#x27;s like unbelievable.&#x22; In fact, &#x3C;em&#x3E;The New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; did not report that  Clinton received money from Giustra  for himself; rather,  Giustra donated money to Clinton&#x27;s foundation.   </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802010002</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 1 Feb 2008 12:41:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Carlson  -- who has said Obama &#x22;seems like kind of a wuss&#x22; and &#x22;sounds like a pothead&#x22; --  now claims he &#x22;give[s]  the guy a pass at every turn&#x22;    </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200801290014</link>
<description>Discussing what he described as &#x22;slavish&#x22; and &#x22;slobbering&#x22; media coverage of  Sen. Barack Obama, Tucker Carlson stated: &#x22;And I will freely confess that I am  absolutely part of the problem. I give the guy a pass at every turn and I&#x27;m nice  to him even though I disagree with him.&#x22; In fact, over the past year, Carlson  has leveled personal attacks against Obama and spread misinformation about him.  &#x3C;br /&#x3E;
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200801290014</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 18:47:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>MSNBC&#x27;s Carlson  mocked Clinton  for her comments about gender discrimination  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200801230007</link>
<description>After airing a video clip of Sen. Hillary Clinton talking about &#x22;gender  equality&#x22; during a Democratic presidential candidates debate, MSNBC host Tucker  Carlson stated: &#x22;It takes a lot of guts for a rich, privileged white lady who is  one of the most powerful people in the world to claim that she is a victim of  gender discrimination.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200801230007</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:08:09 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Imus  and Carlson invoke Chavez to smear Dem presidential candidates    </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200801220009</link>
<description>While discussing Hillary Clinton with fellow  radio host Jay Severin, Don Imus  asked, &#x22;Well, why do we think that we -- I mean, why don&#x27;t we just select  [Venezuelan President] Hugo Chavez, then, if we want some rabid nut? I mean, why  do we think that that&#x27;s a face we want to put on America?&#x22;  Severin answered: &#x22;I think you&#x27;ve got that, that&#x27;s pretty much it. With Hillary  Clinton you&#x27;ve got Hugo Chavez in a dress, and about the same size.&#x22; Separately,  discussing John Edwards&#x27; performance in the Nevada caucus, MSNBC&#x27;s Tucker Carlson  asserted, &#x22;It turns out that Hugo Chavez and his ideas are still not that  popular in this country, liberal as it&#x27;s become. That&#x27;s the lesson I take away.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200801220009</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:39:04 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Carlson:  &#x22;many black churches are basically political  organizations&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200801150019</link>
<description>On the January 14 edition of MSNBC&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;Tucker&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, while discussing Sen. Barack Obama&#x27;s speech at the Pentecostal Temple Church of God and Christ in Las Vegas, host Tucker Carlson asserted that &#x22;many black churches are basically political organizations.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200801150019</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:39:04 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Citing &#x22;Clintonian answer,&#x22; Carlson found another reason to call Obama &#x22;a wuss&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200711290001</link>
<description>MSNBC&#x27;s Tucker Carlson called Sen. Barack
Obama a &#x22;wuss&#x22; and a &#x22;BS artist,&#x22; citing
Obama&#x27;s response to the question,
&#x22;What does the word &#x27;Clintonian&#x27; mean to you?&#x22; during a recent ABC News interview. Carlson asserted that
&#x22;[h]e should just [have] come out and sa[id], &#x27;Yeah, [Sen. Hillary
Clinton is] Clintonian.&#x27; ... &#x27;That&#x27;s why they call it
Clintonian.&#x27; &#x22; He later claimed that people &#x22;who plan to vote
for her know that she is Clintonian in her answers. I mean, that&#x27;s seen
as a good thing a lot of the time. Why doesn&#x27;t Barack Obama have the
gumption, the moxie, the toughness?&#x22;

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200711290001</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 19:37:46 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On MSNBC&#x3C;em&#x3E;, Politico&#x27;s &#x3C;/em&#x3E;Hearn repeats media myth that only some voters are &#x22;values voters&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200711150007</link>
<description>On MSNBC&#x27;s Tucker, the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Josephine Hearn stated
that if Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee wins the Iowa caucuses, &#x22;I
think that&#x27;s very damaging to Mitt Romney, because they&#x27;re both
going after values voters. So they&#x27;re both trolling in the same
areas.&#x22; Hearn&#x27;s use of the label &#x22;values voters&#x22; to
characterize the subset of voters being targeted by Huckabee and Romney
advanced the myth that this group of voters is the only political constituency
that votes its &#x22;values.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200711150007</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 14:53:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>MSNBC&#x27;s  Carlson &#x22;outraged&#x22; by discussion of Giuliani&#x27;s marriages -- but not the  Clintons&#x27;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200710240003</link>
<description>Tucker Carlson said he was &#x22;outraged&#x22; by a statement from Rep. 
Charlie 
Rangel critical of 
Rudy Giuliani&#x27;s &#x22;personal life,&#x22; adding, &#x22;I don&#x27;t think you should attack 
Giuliani for philandering.&#x22; But Carlson has previously asserted that Sen. 
Hillary Clinton&#x27;s marriage to former President Bill Clinton is &#x22;[o]f course&#x22; an 
issue in the 2008 presidential election, discussing the Clintons&#x27; marriage in TV 
appearances, with 
references to Bill 
Clinton&#x27;s &#x22;philander[ing]&#x22; and 
&#x22;famous appetites.&#x22;

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200710240003</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:49:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Carlson: Obama campaign&#x27;s targeting of young voters has &#x22;a Khmer Rouge quality to it&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200710110003</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Tucker&#x3C;/em&#x3E;,
discussing the targeting of 17-year-old Iowa
voters by Sen. Barack Obama&#x27;s presidential campaign, Tucker Carlson said
the practice has &#x22;a Khmer Rouge quality to it,&#x22; adding,
&#x22;[I]t&#x27;s scary.&#x22; He also stated, &#x22;[I]f a right-wing
candidate came and targeted my kids, I&#x27;d be mad about it. I don&#x27;t
want my kids near political candidates. ... They&#x27;re creepy.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200710110003</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:37:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>