<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - U.S. News &#x26;amp; World Report</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/u_s__news__amp__world_report</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: U.S. News &#x26;amp; World Report</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>Myths  and falsehoods about progress in Iraq</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200709090001</link>
<description>Supporters of the Iraq war -- rather than waiting for testimony by Gen. David 
Petraeus and U.S. ambassador to Iraq Ryan Crocker on the effect of President 
Bush&#x27;s troop increase in Iraq -- have engaged in a campaign to convince the 
media and public that progress is being made in Iraq and that the 
&#x22;surge&#x22; is 
&#x22;working.&#x22; &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E; has compiled some of the 
most pervasive myths and falsehoods advanced by 
opponents of withdrawal in service of the &#x22;surge is working&#x22; message, 
which many in the media 
have been complicit in perpetuating.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200709090001</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 9 Sep 2007 13:15:20 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media  misrepresent Clyburn remarks to air attacks on  Democrats</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708020011</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708020011</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 2 Aug 2007 19:38:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>What haircut stories tell us about the press</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200705010001</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200705010001</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 1 May 2007 12:25:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Misleading &#x3C;em&#x3E;NY&#x3C;/em&#x3E; &#x3C;em&#x3E;Times &#x3C;/em&#x3E;article provides fodder for conservatives to attack Gore on global warming</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200703260011</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200703260011</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 19:51:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;U.S.&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x3C;em&#x3E; News&#x3C;/em&#x3E;: Clinton has &#x22;longtime image among critics as a harridan and a polarizer&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200703060006</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200703060006</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 6 Mar 2007 12:01:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media outlets respond to Morris retraction</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200701190007</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200701190007</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:34:18 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; and others repeated Morris&#x27; Obama falsehood despite Morris&#x27; acknowledgment of error</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200701180007</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200701180007</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 12:59:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Despite McCain&#x27;s many hedges, Borger asserted that &#x22;[n]o one would accuse McCain of equivocating on anything&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200610310003</link>
<description>In her &#x3C;em&#x3E;U.S. News &#x26;amp; World Report&#x3C;/em&#x3E; column,
Gloria Borger asserted that &#x22;[n]o one would accuse [Sen. John]
McCain [R-AZ] of equivocating on anything.&#x22; But McCain has done just that
on a variety of issues, including tax cuts for the wealthy, abortion, teaching
intelligent design to public school students, and the Confederate flag.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200610310003</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:38:48 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Suggested question for Mehlman: Do you &#x3C;em&#x3E;really&#x3C;/em&#x3E; not recall whether you had Sabbath dinner at Jack Abramoff&#x27;s house?</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200610170001</link>
<description>Republican National Committee chairman Ken Mehlman has been inconsistent in his public statements about his relationship to disgraced GOP lobbyist Jack Abramoff. In recent interviews, CNN&#x27;s Wolf Blitzer and &#x3C;em&#x3E;U.S. News &#x26;amp; World Report&#x3C;/em&#x3E; staff writer Will Sullivan passed up the opportunity to challenge Mehlman about these inconsistencies.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200610170001</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 20:02:10 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Barone falsely claimed &#x3C;em&#x3E;St. Petersburg Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; found alleged Foley emails &#x22;so innocuous as to be unworthy of publication&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200610090001</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;U.S. News &#x26;amp; World Report&#x3C;/em&#x3E; senior writer Michael Barone claimed that the &#x3C;em&#x3E;St. Petersburg Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; concluded that emails then-Rep. Mark Foley allegedly sent to a former page in 2005 &#x22;were so innocuous as to be unworthy of publication.&#x22; Contrary to Barone&#x27;s claim, the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; stated that it assigned two reporters to the story and decided not to publish the emails not because they were &#x22;innocuous&#x22; but because the family of the former page did not want the matter explored further.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200610090001</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Oct 2006 12:22:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;U.S. News&#x3C;/em&#x3E; wrote that &#x22;religious leaders&#x22; and &#x22;the morals side&#x22; support Hastert -- but many religious leaders have criticized him</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200610050014</link>
<description>A &#x3C;em&#x3E;U.S. News &#x26;amp; World Report&#x3C;/em&#x3E; online article asserted that House Speaker Dennis Hastert had &#x22;recover[ed]&#x22; from the scandal surrounding former Rep. Mark Foley because Hastert &#x22;w[on] support from conservatives&#x22; and because &#x22;religious leaders&#x22; did not demand his resignation. In fact, progressive religious leaders -- and conservative Family Research Council president Tony Perkins -- have criticized Hastert and the Republican leadership over the Foley scandal.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200610050014</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Oct 2006 18:55:18 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;U.S. News&#x3C;/em&#x3E; cherry-picked polling data to misleadingly suggest political danger for Democrats</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200607310006</link>
<description>A &#x3C;em&#x3E;U.S. News &#x26;amp; World Report&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article used cherry-picked and out-of-context polling results to misleadingly suggest that Democrats face dire political consequences if they disagree with Republicans on national security issues. The article conflated public opinion of the parties&#x27; handling of two separate issues, Iraq and terrorism. Further, the article invoked Democratic losses in 2002 and 2004 that &#x22;were attributed largely to the GOP advantage on national security&#x22; without noting that the advantage the GOP held on national security in those elections has greatly dwindled, and in some cases vanished altogether.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200607310006</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 17:06:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media use Republican disarray to bash Democrats</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200604040004</link>
<description>In recent days, AP writer Tom Raum and &#x3C;em&#x3E;U.S. News &#x26;amp; World Report&#x3C;/em&#x3E; contributing editor Gloria Borger have taken pot shots at Democrats while ostensibly writing about problems within the Republican Party.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200604040004</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 4 Apr 2006 16:00:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;U.S. News&#x3C;/em&#x3E;: Bush&#x27;s &#x22;hands-off&#x22; management style &#x22;worked for him as an oilman&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200603280005</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;U.S. News &#x26;amp; World Report&#x3C;/em&#x3E; featured an article on how &#x22;George Bush wants to run his presidency like a business,&#x22; which noted that Bush, according to White House insiders, &#x22;is applying the hands-off style he learned at Harvard Business School ... and also the methods that worked for him as an oilman.&#x22; &#x3C;em&#x3E;U.S. News&#x3C;/em&#x3E; never explained what exactly the &#x22;methods that worked&#x22; for Bush in the oil industry were, but according to news reports, they appear to have involved using his family&#x27;s connections and influence to keep his failing oil venture afloat.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200603280005</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 11:52:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;U.S. News&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27; Zuckerman: Charges that warrantless domestic spying is illegal &#x22;miss the point&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200602220003</link>
<description>In his &#x3C;em&#x3E;U.S. News &#x26;amp; World Report&#x3C;/em&#x3E; column, Mortimer B. Zuckerman wrote that arguments that the Bush administration&#x27;s warrantless domestic spying program is illegal &#x22;miss the point.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200602220003</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 12:41:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>