<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Viveca Novak</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/viveca_novak</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Viveca Novak</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>Ignoring change after Kerry rating, FactCheck.org claimed &#x3C;em&#x3E;National Journal &#x3C;/em&#x3E;has used same &#x22;rigorous process ... since 1981&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802140013</link>
<description>In an &#x22;analysis&#x22; of Sen. Barack Obama&#x27;s response to a question about being rated the &#x22;most liberal senator&#x22; of 2007 by &#x3C;em&#x3E;National Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, FactCheck.org deputy director Viveca Novak claimed that &#x22;[t]he nonpartisan public policy magazine&#x27;s analysis of the votes and the designation of &#x27;liberal&#x27; and &#x27;conservative&#x27; positions was done according to a rather rigorous process the publication has been using since 1981.&#x22; In fact, &#x3C;em&#x3E;National Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E; editor Charles Green has admitted that the publication changed the methodology it had used in its 2003 ratings after it determined that the methodology that resulted in a &#x22;most liberal&#x22; senator ranking for 2004 Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry had been flawed.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802140013</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:13:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>