<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - War in Iraq</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/war_in_iraq</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: War in Iraq</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>Media quote GOP claim that Obama reversed Iraq policy, without noting Obama&#x27;s prior statements  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200807030014</link>
<description>In covering Sen. Barack Obama&#x27;s comments, &#x22;When I go to Iraq and have a chance to talk to some of the commanders on the ground, I&#x27;m sure I&#x27;ll have more information and will continue to refine my policies,&#x22; the media have reported Republican claims that Obama reversed himself. In fact, Obama has said for months that he would set Iraq war policy in consultation with military commanders.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200807030014</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 3 Jul 2008 20:47:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Limbaugh: Democrats will not say &#x22;We honor your service&#x22; to troops returning from Iraq    </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200807030005</link>
<description> Rush Limbaugh asserted that troops returning from Iraq &#x22;will not receive anything from the Democrat [sic] Party along the likes of &#x27;Job well done. We&#x27;re proud of you.&#x27; And this is highly distressing. Not only will Democrats not say, nor leftists, say to any returning troops from Iraq, &#x27;Good job. Job well done. We honor your service.&#x27; No, they did just the opposite. They sought to secure defeat of the U.S. military in Iraq.&#x22; In fact, many Senate Democrats recently honored the service of U.S. troops serving in Iraq and Afghanistan.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200807030005</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 3 Jul 2008 15:34:03 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>AP ignored previous reporting on Obama&#x27;s questioning of Petraeus  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806250004</link>
<description>An AP article stated that Sen. John McCain &#x22;chid[ed] [Sen. Barack Obama] for never receiving a briefing from Gen. David Petraeus, commander of U.S. forces in [Iraq].&#x22; The article reported McCain&#x27;s claims without challenging them -- it made no mention of the fact that Obama has twice questioned Petraeus on the situation in Iraq during Senate hearings.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200806250004</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:51:04 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Dobbs falsely asserted Obama &#x22;in a complete reversal&#x22; is only &#x22;now&#x22; considering trip to Iraq</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806170008</link>
<description>CNN&#x27;s Lou Dobbs claimed that &#x22;in what appears to be a complete reversal tonight, Senator [Barack] Obama says he&#x27;s considering a trip now to Iraq.&#x22; In fact, Obama has said on several occasions since last November that he is considering a trip to Iraq.    </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200806170008</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 16:36:09 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN.com article asserted Obama may have raised issue of McCain&#x27;s age without noting context or campaign&#x27;s denials  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806160009</link>
<description>In an analysis, CNN.com asserted that Sen. Barack Obama &#x22;may have&#x22; launched &#x22;[t]he first salvo of the general election&#x27;s age war&#x22; when he &#x22;argued in an interview ... that [Sen. John] McCain had &#x27;lost his bearings&#x27; while pursuing the Republican nomination.&#x22; But CNN.com did not provide the context of Obama&#x27;s remark, which would have made clear that Obama was responding to a smear by McCain and was accusing McCain of violating his pledge to avoid negative campaigning when he made the statement.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200806160009</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 17:05:10 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Matthews did not challenge Republican strategist&#x27;s false claim that &#x22;it was Senator McCain who called for Don Rumsfeld to be sacked&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806160002</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Hardball&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Todd Harris falsely claimed that &#x22;it was Senator [John] McCain who called for Don Rumsfeld to be sacked.&#x22; Chris Matthews responded: &#x22;Right.&#x22; But a McCain spokesman reportedly acknowledged that McCain &#x22;did not call for his resignation.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200806160002</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:39:48 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Levin, MacCallum falsely accused Obama of inconsistency on whether Iranian Revolutionary Guard should be designated a terrorist group  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806060008</link>
<description>On his radio show, Mark Levin falsely asserted that Sen. Barack Obama &#x22;lied to&#x22; the American Israel Public Affairs Committee when he &#x22;told them today that the Iranian Revolutionary Guards should be designated a terrorist group after voting against a bill designating them a terrorist group a year ago.&#x22; Similarly, Fox News&#x27; Martha MacCallum asserted that Obama &#x22;seems to be changing his tune on the significant issue.&#x22; In fact, Obama has consistently supported designating the Iranian Revolutionary Guard a terrorist organization, having co-sponsored a bill in 2007 to do that.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200806060008</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Jun 2008 19:59:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN, Fox News falsely suggested Senate report finding Bush administration &#x22;misled Americans&#x22; about Iraq-Al Qaeda link was approved only by Dems  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806060002</link>
<description>CNN&#x27;s Carol Costello and Ed Henry, and Fox News&#x27; Brit Hume falsely suggested that only the Democratic members of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence approved the committee&#x27;s June 5 &#x22;Report on Whether Public Statements Regarding Iraq by U.S. Government Officials Were Substantiated by Intelligence Information.&#x22; In addition to the committee&#x27;s Democrats, Republican Sens. Chuck Hagel and Olympia Snowe endorsed the report and stated that it &#x22;accomplished its primary objective.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200806060002</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Jun 2008 13:47:15 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s Dobbs, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Daily News&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27; Goodwin expressed incredulity that Pelosi would &#x22;giv[e] the Iranians the credit,&#x22; but her comments echoed CNN&#x27;s own reporting  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806040005</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Lou Dobbs Tonight&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Lou Dobbs and Michael Goodwin cited House Speaker Nancy Pelosi&#x27;s comments about Iran negotiating an end to fighting in Basra, Iraq, to accuse her of being unwilling to give credit to U.S. troops and being &#x22;invested in failure&#x22; when, in fact, CNN itself reported that Iran had played an integral role in brokering a cease-fire in Basra, as did numerous other media outlets.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200806040005</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 4 Jun 2008 15:16:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ignoring McCain&#x27;s own votes against troop funding, AP, &#x3C;em&#x3E;LA Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; uncritically quoted his attacks on Obama  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806040002</link>
<description>The AP and the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Los Angeles Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; quoted Sen. John McCain&#x27;s assertion that Sen. Barack Obama voted &#x22;to deny funds to the soldiers who have done a brilliant and brave job&#x22; in Iraq, without noting that McCain himself voted against bills that would have provided &#x22;funds to the soldiers&#x22; serving in Afghanistan and Iraq.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200806040002</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 4 Jun 2008 13:47:20 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Despite contrary evidence, CNN&#x27;s Townsend insisted &#x22;facts&#x22; show neither Rove nor Libby outed Plame as CIA operative  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806020002</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;CNN Newsroom&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, CNN national security contributor Fran Townsend twice made the false claim that neither Karl Rove nor I. Lewis &#x22;Scooter&#x22; Libby had &#x22;outed Valerie Plame&#x22; as a CIA agent and that the leaker was Richard Armitage. In fact, both Rove and Libby were sources of the information about Plame&#x27;s CIA employment for at least two journalists.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200806020002</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 Jun 2008 14:20:03 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;SF Chronicle&#x3C;/em&#x3E; did not report that McCain&#x27;s claim, &#x22;We have drawn down to pre-surge levels,&#x22; was false    </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806010001</link>
<description>Reporting that Sen. John McCain &#x22;had to defend his [May 29] comments that U.S. troops are down to &#x27;presurge level,&#x27; &#x22; the &#x3C;em&#x3E;San Francisco Chronicle&#x3C;/em&#x3E; did not point out that McCain&#x27;s statement was false. As &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; noted, there are about 155,000 troops in Iraq, well above the 130,000 there before the increase. Further, in reporting that McCain &#x22;insisted he hadn&#x27;t misspoken,&#x22; the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Chronicle&#x3C;/em&#x3E; did not point out that, in addition to his false statement about troop levels in Iraq, he also &#x22;misspoke[]&#x22; by misstating what he had initially said.    </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200806010001</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 1 Jun 2008 13:05:48 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Will pundits who blasted Howard Dean in 2003 over troop-numbers response question McCain&#x27;s fitness following his Iraq troop-level falsehood?  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200805300012</link>
<description>During a May 29 campaign appearance, Sen. John McCain falsely stated that U.S. troops in Iraq &#x22;have [been] drawn down to pre-surge levels.&#x22; As the Associated Press reported, &#x22;[T]here are 17 brigades in Iraq&#x22; right now, as opposed to the 15 brigades in place before the increase. In 2003, then-Democratic presidential candidate Howard Dean was criticized in the media for his response to a question about the number of active-duty soldiers, with Tim Russert and others questioning his fitness to be commander in chief. In light of McCain&#x27;s troop-surge falsehood and numerous national security gaffes, will the media similarly question his suitability to be commander in chief?  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200805300012</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 21:41:18 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>AP reported McCain&#x27;s &#x22;ready response&#x22; to Obama on health care, but not that it was false  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200805300011</link>
<description>The Associated Press&#x27; Liz Sidoti reported without challenge several attacks Sen. John McCain recently made against Sen. Barack Obama, including what Sidoti referred to as his &#x22;ready response&#x22; that a &#x22;significant difference between myself and Senator Obama&#x22; is that &#x22;I am not going to dictate that the government decide what your health care is going to be.&#x22; In fact, Obama&#x27;s plan does not allow for government control of health care; rather, it calls for individuals to choose their own insurance.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200805300011</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 21:31:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>While Mike Allen equated critics of White House press corps&#x27; war coverage with &#x22;left-wing haters,&#x22; ex-colleague Dobbs wrote, &#x22;We failed you&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200805300008</link>
<description>On Mike Gallagher&#x27;s radio show, Mike Allen said of Scott McClellan&#x27;s new book: &#x22;Scott does adopt the vocabulary, rhetoric of the left-wing haters. Can you believe it in here he says that the White House press corps was too deferential to the administration ... in the run-up to the war?&#x22; By contrast, two of Allen&#x27;s former colleagues echoed the media criticism of Allen&#x27;s so-called &#x22;left-wing haters.&#x22; Michael Dobbs asserted that &#x22;on the question of whether the American press did its job properly during the run-up to the Iraq war, it is difficult to argue with his conclusions. We failed you.&#x22; Similarly, Howard Kurtz stated that print coverage during the run-up to the war was &#x22;flawed,&#x22; adding: &#x22;It was only when violence surged in Iraq and public opinion began turning against the war that ABC, CBS, NBC, and the rest of the media turned more skeptical.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200805300008</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 19:30:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>