Charlie Kirk says Democrats can only win with the “largest mass conspiracy of spousal lying in political history”
Kirk: Democrats “need millions of spousal infidelity when it comes to voting”
Published
Citation From the November 3, 2024, edition of Thoughtcrime, posted to Rumble
CHARLIE KIRK (HOST): And, again, I got — I went very viral. And Andrew would agree — I was so vanilla in how I said this. I was simply analyzing that it's unhealthy for a political movement to try to encourage a wife to lie to their husband about who they vote for. I just think that's really gross, honestly, about, like, the deceit between — like, the disharmony of a holy union. That's just me.
So, I wanna play this, though, because this is the Julia Roberts ad where it makes the -- obviously, the man look like a Trump supporter and like a stupid buffoon, even it shows him voting for Donald Trump. And then it — the woman — I'm sorry. Cut 3. This is a different one. That was a different one I'm talking about. And the woman, it votes for Kamala Harris in the advertisement, and she lies to her husband about who she votes for. And the demo — so just so we're clear, the Democrats push to win, in order for the Democrats to win with the current data, millions of wives would have to lie to their husbands. I'm gonna say that again. In order for them — because we're not seeing this in the data yet. We're not seeing this collapse. Their path to victory would be the largest mass conspiracy of spousal lying in political history. Prove me wrong.
...
ANDREW KOLVET (CO-HOST): Yeah. I mean, what you said on Megyn Kelly, Charlie, just to reiterate what you were saying, you said a verifiable fact, and I think it tweaked a lot of the left-wingers. You said this guy, this white man or whatever that looks kinda like a douche in this particular advertisement, was probably supporting his family. Obviously, he's an actor, but in general, if you extrapolate it out, he's probably supporting his family, providing, giving them his family a good life. Well, turns out, Charlie, if you took a macro analysis of the American workforce and American family structure, only 18% of families have the woman as the breadwinner. I genuinely think that was the only reason people got offended by what you said. You said this guy's probably, you know, providing for his family, and this is how she basically, you know, gets back at him to —
KIRK: Why is that offensive, though? I mean —
KOLVET: Well, exactly. By the way, Megyn Kelly even did a follow-up portion of her show the next day and said Charlie Kirk did nothing wrong. Like, this is objectively true. So, the point is, I think they just don't like the idea of a strong masculine figure in the home providing for his family. But beyond that, to encourage your wife to lie is, I think, incredibly offensive. Encouraging wives to lie to their husbands is incredibly disgusting and offensive. But this is what's crazy, Charlie, they're actually posting numbers saying they think 1 in 8 spouses are essentially lying to their husbands about who they voted for. They're like, oh, look at these encouraging numbers. And, yeah. I mean, exactly. But they're essentially saying, you know, look at the downfall of the American, you know, family, the institution of marriage.
KIRK: I mean, isn't it fitting that if — isn't it fitting — and then, Blake, like, that in order for Democrats to hold on to power, they need mass — they need millions of spousal infidelity when it comes to voting. Isn't that fitting, Blake?