Charlie Kirk suggests removing chickenpox and hepatitis B from childhood vaccine schedule
Kirk: “Is a hepatitis B vaccine really necessary for every newborn child? Is that really necessary? Do we really need to inoculate against chickenpox? ... It is a modern secular religion believing that vaccines are completely unchallengeable.”
Published
Citation
From the January 29, 2025, edition of The Charlie Kirk Show, streamed on Rumble
CHARLIE KIRK (HOST): Now understand, if you question the efficacy or the safety of vaccines, they call you anti-vaxx.
Of course, vaccines can be a scientific, miraculous breakthrough.
Are they necessary for everything that we are vaccine against? Is a hepatitis B vaccine really necessary for every newborn child? Is that really necessary? Do we really need to inoculate against chickenpox?
The schedule has ramped up so dramatically since 1991. And if you even dare to say that, yes, there very well might be side effects — which, by the way, the labels themselves say. Every doctor will quietly say, of course, they're side effects, potentially. But we can't say that or else you're called anti-vaccine. It is a modern secular religion believing that vaccines are completely unchallengeable.
And do you know that vaccines are one of the few things that we have where if something goes wrong, you're not able to sue the manufacturer? So if a car explodes and kills your kid, you should be able to sue the car manufacturer to make sure the car is safe for a future user and be able to get damages. If a vaccine gives your kid some sort of neurodivergent neurological disorder, potentially, you go to the vaccine adverse event reporting system, VAERS, and good luck. The entire incentive structure right now is trying to keep people permanently sick, trying to keep people permanently in a state where they can be controlled, where they are annuities for big pharma.