During Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Senate confirmation hearing, right-leaning Facebook pages posted more about the hearing than other news and politics pages did — and notably, these posts increased as they coalesced around bad-faith attacks on Jackson circulated by right-wing media and politicians. In fact, many of the top-performing posts from right-leaning pages — and many Facebook ads run from right-wing groups — promoted narratives designed to manufacture outrage, such as claiming that Jackson wouldn’t “define what a woman is” or falsely claiming Jackson has a history of giving out lenient sentences for sex offenders.
The feedback loop between right-wing media, Republicans on the Senate committee, and right-leaning Facebook pages kicked into overdrive during Jackson’s confirmation hearing between March 21 and 24. During the hearing — and in the days that followed — the right-wing ecosystem propagated bad-faith attacks on Jackson, as senators on the committee generated outrageous clips and baseless narratives that right-wing media amplified and circulated on the air and online.
Media Matters compiled and analyzed Facebook ads and posts about Jackson’s confirmation hearing posted by news and politics pages between March 21 and 27. We found that during this time frame, right-leaning pages posted more about Jackson’s hearing than left-leaning or ideologically nonaligned pages did, and some of these posts from right-leaning pages pushed smears and bad-faith attacks about Jackson. Facebook also allowed ads from right-wing groups and media outlets that pushed similar smears, earning thousands of dollars in revenue.
Key findings:
- Between March 21 and 27, right-leaning pages accounted for roughly 37% of posts about the hearing from news and politics pages.
- Right-leaning pages posted more about Jackson as the hearing went on and GOP senators pushed baseless smears in the committee. In fact, ideologically nonaligned pages posted more than other pages during the first two days of the hearing, but right-leaning pages posted the most of the three groups on each day after that.
- The posts about the hearing from right-leaning pages that earned the most interactions pushed outrage-baiting commentary that Jackson wouldn’t “define what a woman is” or promoted the baseless smear that Jackson has history of allowing sex offenders “off the hook” and is “soft on crime.” Notably, this commentary accounted for roughly a quarter of the top 100 posts from news and politics pages.
- Between March 21 and 27, Facebook earned up to $12,500 in revenue from ads from right-wing politicians, organizations, and media outlets that referenced the baseless smear of Jackson being “soft on crime,” particularly sex offenses, or claimed she is unqualified because she couldn’t define “woman.” Right-wing organizations American Principles Project, Gun Owners of America, and Heritage Action for America funded most of these ads.