The Federalist recently published an article which flagrantly argued that for Christians, dying from COVID-19 “is a good thing.” And that was just the latest in the outlet's dangerous pandemic coverage, which has undermined the vaccine rollout and suggested COVID-19 protections are anti-Christian, dangerous, and discriminatory.
The recent article, published October 18, positioned COVID-19 precautions as an attack on Christianity in an effort to undermine the gravity of the pandemic. Written by Joy Pullmann, executive editor at the Federalist, the article condemned churches pausing services out of precaution and claimed that doing so “contradicts numerous clear commands of scripture.” Pullmann further suggested that Christians must “individually and corporately … repent” for pandemic safety guidelines that interfered with worship and thus “betrayed Our Lord.”
Media Matters has repeatedly identified The Federalist’s pattern of pushing COVID-19 denial and advocating reckless behavior when it comes to public health. In the early months of the pandemic, the outlet even suggested that “controlled voluntary infection” was a solution to ending the pandemic. Later on, it asserted that “without a real coronavirus vaccine, herd immunity is our only hope” -- a claim that has been debunked by the scientific community and would result in millions of deaths before the herd immunity threshold could be reached.
Brazenly inaccurate and socially irresponsible, The Federalist’s spread of COVID-19 misinformation serves only to prolong the pandemic by minimizing its risks and undermining the efficacy of standard coronavirus protections.
In addition to the recent article, here are some of the worst narratives The Federalist has peddled in its crusade against public health measures since the COVID-19 vaccine became available to the public earlier this year.
Painting COVID-19 protective measures as dangerous and discriminatory
The Federalist has attacked COVID-19 protective measures of all kinds, spreading baseless claims that undermine public health initiatives:
- Senior contributor Jonathan S. Tobin compared vaccine mandates to racist Jim Crow laws because mandates “discriminate against minorities.” Tobin claimed that because of relatively lower rates of vaccination among Black Americans, vaccine mandates will effectively “ban most black people from the public square.”
Suggesting that vaccines and other COVID-19 protections are anti-Christian
The Federalist has leveraged Christianity in its opposition to COVID-19 protections, attempting to cement pandemic safety measures as another flashpoint of the culture war:
- An October 11 article urged Christian leaders to speak out against “vaccine coercion,” claiming that “the Bible clearly opposes abusive mandates” and they will “destroy the livelihoods of healthy Americans and subject their children to poverty."
Amplifying vaccine skepticism and refusal
The Federalist has repeatedly provided a platform to individuals refusing to comply with vaccine mandates and amplified and encouraged vaccine skepticism:
- After NBA players Kyrie Irving and Jonathan Isaac spoke publicly about their choice not to receive the COVID-19 vaccine despite the basketball’s league requirements, the Federalist heralded them as the “most cogent and principled defenders of liberty, common sense, and basic civic decency in America."