On his Fox News show, Glenn Beck stated, “I read a lot.” That may be, but if his interpretation of a recent New York Times editorial is any indication, his reading comprehension leaves a bit to be desired.

Launching an attack on progressive income tax rates, Beck claimed, "The New York Times is doing their best to cover the spending tracks left by President Obama." Beck explained:

BECK: The Times claims that the deficit is a result of cutting taxes on the wealthy. And they offer this stern warning to us little people: “The last thing that government should do is slash spending.” Wow. I wish I wasn't such a little person and I could understand that. History tells us taxing the rich and slashing government spending are both progressive lies. But you have to know history. You know, a lot of people will say, “That Glenn Beck, he's just a big, dumb dummy.” Well, maybe I am. You can disagree with me all you want. But I read a lot. I read a lot of in-depth history.

The article, Beck said, could win “the gold medal in mental gymnastics” since the Times “will bend, twist, and contort all of the facts into a pretty, little, grimy, little ball of blame-Bush.”

The thing is, I also read that New York Times editorial. Even the parts Beck omitted to fit into a pretty little ball:

The deficit numbers -- a projected $1.3 trillion in fiscal 2011 alone -- are breathtaking. What is even more breathtaking is the Republicans' cynical refusal to acknowledge that the country would never have gotten into so deep a hole if President George W. Bush and the Republican-led Congress had not spent years slashing taxes -- mainly on the wealthy -- and spending with far too little restraint. Unfortunately, the problem does not stop there.

See, the Times did not claim that “the deficit is a result of cutting taxes on the wealthy,” as Beck claimed. The editorial stated that a combination of cutting taxes largely on wealthy taxpayers and reckless spending under Republican economic stewardship facilitated the current fiscal situation.

Further, when Beck said he couldn't understand the Times' warning that "[t]he last thing government should do is slash spending," this likely was due to his omission of the comments immediately preceding those he quoted:

At a time of high unemployment and fragile growth, the last thing the government should do is to slash spending. That will only drive the economy into deeper trouble.

As it turns out, in reading, context matters.