NBC News reported last week that lawyers say they can’t reunite 545 children separated from their families at the border as part of President Donald Trump’s anti-immigration policy. The policy has been widely criticized as inhumane, and Trump himself attempted to blur the lines of responsibility and soften the reality of what his administration did when he was questioned about it at a presidential debate. Right-wing media has dutifully backed him up, insisting that critics are misrepresenting the policy or lying about the facts behind its origins and implementation.
NBC News’ Julia Ainsley and Jacob Soboroff reported on October 20 that lawyers appointed by a federal judge to reunite families that the Trump administration separated at the U.S.-Mexico border have been unable to find the parents of 545 children, and that “about two-thirds of those parents were deported to Central America without their children.” Trump’s administration has tried to dispute criticisms of the child separation policy; a Department of Homeland Security spokesperson said that the “narrative has been dispelled,” and White House spokesperson Brian Morgenstern claimed that many parents “have declined to accept their children back.” When the topic was brought up at last week’s presidential debate, Trump sought to deflect responsibility, arguing that former President Barack Obama’s administration pursued similar policies.
However, Trump’s “zero tolerance” policy was unique to his administration in that it was a deliberate plan designed to deter migrants from seeking asylum in the U.S. by separating parents from their children. The punitive motivations for the policy, which was infamously crafted by white nationalist-linked Trump senior adviser Stephen Miller, have been made clear through reporting behind the decision. According to a new internal investigation, U.S. attorneys told top Justice Department officials at the time that they were “deeply concerned” about the children’s welfare, but they were rebuked. Trump’s then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions, according to a participant’s notes, said in a meeting that “we need to take away children” so that people won’t seek amnesty out of concern for their families. Then-Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein also reportedly emphasized that it did not matter how young the children were -- according to The New York Times, “He said that government lawyers should not have refused to prosecute two cases simply because the children were barely more than infants.”
Lee Gelernt, deputy director of the ACLU Immigrants' Rights Project, spoke to NBC News about the administration’s various explanations: