Climate deniers often claim that increased carbon dioxide emissions are a net positive, even though rising temperatures are causing stronger storms, heat waves, and wildfires, harming vulnerable populations around the world.
For example, climate denier Patrick Moore, a right-wing media darling who works as a nuclear energy consultant, has refuted the idea that carbon dioxide levels are “getting too high” due to human activity. In 2022, Moore wrote on X, “It has been known since at least 1920 that adding CO2 to greenhouses and even to open air causes a huge increase in plant growth, with no harm caused to plants or animals. The ‘climate emergency’ is a hoax.” Moore is also a member of the CO2 Coalition, a climate denial group dedicated to the idea that carbon dioxide cannot be a pollutant.
Meanwhile, scientists have long emphasized that the risks of extreme global warming far outweigh the potential benefits of plant growth, and that climate change threatens to collapse ecosystems. One 2019 study even found that CO2 may lower the nutritional value of crop yields.
Rogan’s comment on the “ideology” of climate science and corporations pushing “green energy” is also straight from right-wing media, which have long insisted, in bad faith, that decarbonizing the economy and transitioning to renewable energy would be ineffective and claimed that the transition is completely driven by corporate interests rather than science.
For instance, in an April 10 op-ed for FoxNews.com, former Trump economic advisor and Project 2025 contributor Stephen Moore wrote, “The biggest corporate welfare scam ever is green.”
And Rogan’s claim that “we’re ignoring” regenerative agriculture and planting trees as a climate solution (a favorite right-wing suggestion) doesn’t hold up. The Inflation Reduction Act allocated nearly $20 billion to farming and agriculture, part of which is being used to incentivize farmers to adopt regenerative practices that improve soil health, water quality, and resilience to climate change impacts.
Planting trees has been a fallback climate solution for the GOP in place of policy that meaningfully supports an energy transition. For example, in 2023, House Republicans introduced legislation to plant a trillion trees while former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy discussed his intentions to boost oil and gas production.
Scientists say that while legitimate, these types of solutions have limitations and are not silver bullets to address the climate crisis.