LAURA INGRAHAM (HOST): Kurt, earlier tonight, [MSNBC’s] Rachel Maddow seemed to suggest that this leak was worth it.
...
INGRAHAM: Imagine if this was thought to be a conservative law clerk, to leak something in a case that the liberals were all thrilled about. Imagine what Rachel and the crowd would be saying tonight, Kurt.
KURT SCHLICHTER (TOWNHALL COLUMNIST): Oh, I can imagine, Laura. And I think we all know that they'd be rather upset. Look, we have been hearing for almost a year and a half about attacks on our democracy and insurrections. This did more damage than a bunch of elderly Trump voters taking selfies in the rotunda. The actual decision itself is huge. It's probably the most important decision since Plessy v. Ferguson was overturned by Brown v. Board. And as in that case, the Democrats are very, very upset about it.
But I think you're rightly focusing on the procedural aspects, the institutional aspects. And frankly, I think there are a lot of former conservative voices we can't count on. I'm waiting for David French, who is the conservative case for leaking draft opinions, to come out and explain why we're wrong. This is a disaster on every level. The court needs to come together in unanimity against this, and we need to go back to basic principles and basic functions and norms of our institutions. And I'm afraid that's unlikely to happen at this point